Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingll', Criminal Appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 110 OF 2018 Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment dated 30-08-2013 passed in CC.No.267 of 2o12 on the file of the Court of the Vll Special Magistrate, at Hastinapuram, R.R District. Between: J.Devender, S/o Late Narsaiah,' Occ : Business, R/o. H.No.2-2O4t116, Ganeshnagar Colony, Chilkanagara Road Uppal, R.R District. ...AppellanUComplainant ANO 1 M.Santhosh Goud, S/o Yadgiri, Occ-Private Service, R:/o. H.No. 4-12318311, Opp-Pisati Anjl reddy Garden, Swaroop Nagar Colony, Uppal, R.R District, Hyderabad-500039, Also rlo.24-12382/1, Swaroop Nagar, Opp- Pisati Anjireedy Gardens, Uppal, R.R District.
2. The State of Telangana, rep., by Judicature at Hyderabad through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of SHO PS Uppal. .RespondenUAccused ...RespondenURespondents Counsel for the Appellant : J. Devender, Appellant Counsel for the Respondent No.l :
Sri M Anand Kumar Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri M Vivekananda Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor The Court delivered the following: Judgment THE I{ONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL No.11O OF 2018
JUDGMENT:
Operative part
The appellant/complainant filed the appeal questioning the acquittal recorded by the VII Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, R.R.District, in CC.No.267 l2OL3, dated 30.O8.2OL3, for the offence under Section 138 ol the Negotiable Instruments Act. Learned Counsel on record for the appellant/complainant informs the Court that the appellant has taken back the lile six months prior. No alternzrte an'angements were made till date. To give an opportunity, this Court on 13.12.2024, directed the Registry to print the name of the appellant. There is no appearance by anyone on behalf of appellant. Accordingll', Criminal Appeal is dismissed ,TRUE COPY// Sd/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR GISTRAR OFFICER \ To, Hyderabad [OUT]
The Vll Special Magistrate, at Hastinapuram' R R District i. f*" CC" io tn" pub-tic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 3. Oire CC to Sri G i/enkat Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri M l\nand Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies *"% HIGH COURT DATED : 2 2l0'l 12025 I l, JUDGMENT GRLA.No.110 of 2018 t{ ii S II, 74r ( 2 o ? 1 :83 2[25 * , :.i r,..X l C -.i:.j * DISMISSING THE CRLA d
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingll', Criminal Appeal is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 378(4); Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.