✦ High Court of India · 22 Aug 2025

'1 . Nenavath Harya v. '1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 22 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
22 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,033 words

Petition Under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th,-. High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction nrore particularly one in the nature of Writ of [t/andamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in non-considering the representation and online application of the petitioner and non-initiating to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of tl'e respondent Nos.6 to 9 in respect of the petitioners' agriculture land in Sy.Nc 410 to an extent of Ac,8.19 gts situated at Amangal Revenue Village, Amangal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which are issued during the pendency of Second Appeal vide S.A.No 66 of 2O21 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court ancJ suppressing the facts and without following the direction of the Hon'ble High Court in W.P No.19123 of 203 and without issuing any notice, without following the ciue process of law, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 to g and uploaded their names in all revenue records and issued e-pattadar passbooks to me, without having any right and title and on the joint family properties is highly illegal, arbitrary, u ncon stitutiona l, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles '14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct t[e respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the representation and online application cf tt-te petitioner and to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent Nos 6 to 9 in respect of the petitioners' agrrculture land in Sy.No.410 to an extent of Ac.8 19 gts situated at Amangal Revenue Village, Amangal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which are issued during the pendency of Second Appeal vide S.A.No 66 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court and suppressing the facts and to follow the direction of the Hon'ble High Court in W P No.'19123 of 2023 and without issuing any notice, to follow the due process of law, by colluding with the respc,ndent Nos.6 to g and uploaded their names in all revenue records and issued e-t,attadar passbooks to me, without having any right and title and on the joint family properties. |.A.NO:1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the representation and online application of the petitioner and to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent Nos.6 to 9 in respect of the petitioners' agriculture land in sy.No.410 to an extent of Ac.8.19 gts situated at Amangal Revenue village, Amangal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which are issued during the pendency of second Appeat vide s.A.No.66 ot 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble High court and suppressing the facts and to follow the direction of the Hon'ble High court in w.P.No.19123 ot 2023 and without issurng any notice, to follow the due process of taw, by colluding with the respondenl Nos.6 to 9 and uploaded their names in all revenue records and issued e-pattadar passbooks to me, without having any right and title and on the joint family propertres pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5 : AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI M.A.K.MUKHEED Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6, 7, 8 & I : SRI M.DAMOdan neOOy The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.1464 OF 2024 ORAL ORDER: Mr. Rapoiu Bhaskar, learned counsel for che petitioners, seeks permission of thjs Court to withCraw the present Writ Petition. He had acCrcssecl a ietter dated 19.08.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial) to the said effect and the same was placed on record.

2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is Cismissed as withdrawn. In the circumstances of the case, th,:re shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR E ECTION OFFICER N \"r

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Sta e of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. Ohe CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI M DAIVIODAR REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One CC to SRI IV A K.MUKHEED, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies To SA BS HIGH COURT DATED:2210812025 ORDER WP.No.1464 of 2024 -. (Ba i. .,1 .. 6 I I Sil' 2025 /),-,,,.. - DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments