Alapati Kalyanachakravarthy and 3 others v. State of A.P
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
2) Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4976 of 2012 ORDER : The petitioners 1 to 4/A-1 to A-4 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 506 Part II/34 I.P.C and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,
Operative part
1961. There is no dispute about relationship between the parties. A-2 and A-3 are parents and A-4 is paternal uncle of A-1 who is husband of the defacto-complainant. Their marriage took place on 10.04.2009. It is alleged that parents of the defacto-complainant gave Pasupukumkuma of Rs.20,00,000/- in cash to the defacto-complainant and entrusted the same to the accused, apart from giving cash of Rs.2,00,000/- to the accused towards their marriage expenses. There were money transactions between the parties. The transactions were settled before the Lok Adalat on 28.01.2010. It is alleged that the accused have been demanding the defacto-complainant to bring additional dowry from her parents and also to transfer her share in the school being run by her in the name of A-1. It is finally alleged that on the night of 13.05.2012 at about 4.00 A.M, A- 1 to A-4 came in car to the school and that they abused the defacto-complainant and her parents, pushed the defacto- complainant into car and squeezed neck of the defacto- complainant closing her moth and tried to kill her saying that she never heard their words and never executed any document with regard to share in school in favour of A-1 and never brought additional dowry. It is also alleged that they threatened to kill her. The above allegations in the private complaint referred to the police for investigation, disclose ingredients of the offences for which the case was booked by the police. Having regard to the said allegations, this Court is of the opinion that it is a matter for investigation and it cannot be interfered with in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2) Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J June 19, 2012
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2) Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Jun 2012. The bench was SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, SAMUDRALA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.