The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responderrts 2 and 3 to delete the land belonging to the petitioners admeasuring Ac.5.012 Gts. in Sy.No.30 of Gungal Village, Yacharam Mandal, R.R.District, from the prohibited list in the Dharani Portal, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VEDULA SRINIVAS SENIOR COUNSEL REP Smt. VEDULA CHITRALEKHA Counsel.forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER .1 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2599 of 2025 ORDER: It is stated that the petitioners are the pattadars and possessors of the-land admeasuring Acs.5.O2 guntas in Sy.No.30 of Gungal Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquired the same through registered gift deeds bearing document Nos.2i879l!018, 27878 of 2018 and 21880 of 2ota, all dated

05.1O.2O18 executed by their mother. It is further stated thdt the mother of the petitioners by name Mohd.Safiya Begum had purchased the said property through registered "d. deed bearing document No.21O8 of 1990, dated 27.O7.1990 and her name was mutated in the revenue records uide proceedings No.ROR/299 /9O, dated 13.11.1990 and pattadar passbook and title deed were also issued in her favour uide Khata No.637, under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and the Rules made thereunder. It is further stated that the names of the petitioners were also mutated in a_11 the revenue records uide proceedings No.B/793/2Ot9, B/79212019 and B 12230 / 2OI9 and they were issued pattadar passbooks uide Khata Nos.6O258, 6025O and 60188, respectively. It is further stated that the petitioners have also been receiving various incentives and 2 CVBR, J Wp _2599 2025 investment sLlb,sidies sectioned by the Government from time to time. It is furt.her stated that as the respondents without issuing any notice, rrotified the subject land in the list of prohibited properties, the petitioners and their mother were constrained to make online applications seeking deletion of the subject property from the list c,f piohibited properties and denotifyrng the 'same but the same were rejected without assigning any reasr)ns.

2. Considered the submissions of Sri Vedula Srinivas. learned Senior Counsel representing Smt.Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for ttre petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Ple'ader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. I to 3 and with th,:ir consent this writ petition is being disposed at the admission stagt:.

3. Learned lienior Counsel has vehemently contended that the mother of the petitioners had purchased the subject property through regist.ered sale deeds and the name of her vendor and his predecessors-in -interest were reflected in Khasra Pahani and thereafter in V:lsooibaki from the year 1954-55 onwards and the nature of the lands was recorded as Khariz Khata and the respondent atrthorities without examining the saicl documents and without assigrri:eg any reasons have rejected the applications. 3 CVBR, J Wp 2599 2025

4. This Cdurt has carefuliy examined the impugned orders I passed by respondent No.2 rejecting the applications submitted by the petitioners uide application Nos.2200OO0783, 22OOOOO7 53 and 22O00OO79O seeking for deletion of the subject land from the list of prohibited properties and to make necessary corrections for re-classiftring the Iand as patta lands. Except saying that the applications submitted by the petitioners were rejected by the Collector, no valid reason whatsoever has been assigned to enable the petitioners to take appropriate action. Since the impugned rejection orders passed by respondent No.2 is not in consorlance with the principles of natural justice, the same are.liable to be set aside and accordingly, the same are set aside and the respondent authorities are directed to re-examine and consider the petitioners' applications uide N o s.22OO0O0 783, 22OOOOO7 53 ar,d 22OOOOO7 90, duly taking into consideration of the documents enclosed by them in support of their claim and if they are otherwise not eligible for deletion or carrying out necessary corrections or de-noti$r the land from the list of prohibited properties, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioners, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. . 4 CVBR, J tlt p 2599 _2025

5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall b,: no order as to costs

6. As a se,quel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-A.V,S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,: l r \\i\- --- BEcrtou oFFlcER To, T.S..Hvderabacl.

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue' Secretariat' z. ihi'oitiiit 6oitectot, Ransa Reddv District at Kongara Kalan 5. iil; irti;ida,, 'rrir,ata, Mandal, Ranga Reddv District' ;. o;; btto-nti VeouLA cHITRALEKHA, Advocate foPUCl - . 5. i;; d6.io 6. Two CD CoPies; Hyderabad [O[JT] 'ci, ?-on Reveruue ,High court for the state of Telangana at BM BS HIGH COURT DATED:3010112025 ORDER WP.No.2599 of 2025 .1- ,,. ) 1r S I,i r'5. /;' /,/ J i-l l('la 1 a. 1 B FiB 2025 I ..:rr^ ,.- , 4 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS