The High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. AN ; 1l' (Revenue i '.' t ' , 'r Rep :i, ; {., ?i * Panchayath by its District District. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad. : i: 2. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpally , . l: ! ? The Tahasildar, Tekumatla Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. lt, 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhupalpally, Revenue Division, Jayashankar I Bhupalpally District. The Dubyala Gram Panchaya Tekumatla N/andal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally Secretary, ll.: ...RESPONDENTS 5 I I ; *i a: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the +l | circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be t t* 'ilr. pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly one in the natur"e of ' { t*, "({i" writ Nlandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in deleting the : | -,J petitioner name from 1-B register and pahani/adangal in respect of land in ..1 Sy.No.252lB without passing any order and seeking to dispossess the petitioner 'I from the land in Sy.No.252lB admeasuring Ac.1.00 gts under the guise of notice t,7, l*r: dated 06-01 -2020 in R.C.No.Bl722l2O20, that to without passing any speaking ! t , t*'1. order by considering the petitioner explanation dated 08-01-2O2O is illegal, arbitrary and contrbry to law and without jurisdiction apart from violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the constitution of lndia and consequently set aside ,l:, 'r i"!, ,!. * .i ' t* { *, the notice dated 06-01 -2020 in R.C.No. Bt722t2O2O by directing the 3rd respondent to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of land in Sy.No.252lB admeasuring Ac.1.00 gts with a further direction to the respondents No.3 to 5 to not to dispossess the petitioner from above said land. lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to 5 not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.252lB admeasuring Ac.1.00 gts situated at Dubyala Village, Tekumala Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, such as pahani/adangal/1-B register in respect of land in Sy.No.2S2lB admeasuring Ac.1.00 gts situated at Dubyala Village, Tekumafla Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.DEVENDER Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRt K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL UIRIT PETITION No.1338 AF 2O2O ORDER: . This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in deleting the petitioner's name from the 1-B register and Pahani/Adangal in respect of land in Sy. No. 2521B without passing any order, and attempting to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No. 252/8, admeasuring Ac. 1.OO guntas, under tlre guise of notice dated 06.01 .2O2O in R.C. No. 81722/2020, without passing any speaking order or considering the petitioner's explanation dated 08.0 L.2O2O, as illegal and arbitrary; and consequently, to set aside tlle notice dated 06.0L.2O2O by directing.the 3rd respondent to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the land in Sy. No. 252/8, admeasuring Ac. 1.00 guntas, with a further direction to respondent Nos. 3 to 5 not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the I ) Page2 of 4 petition does not survive for further consideration, as the respondents have dropped the action purported to construct a burial ground on the petitioner's land. Hence, the petitioner seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.

3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, produced written instructions from the 3.d respondent/Tahsildar stating that a hearing was conducted based on the representation submitted by the petitioner. The proposal to construct a burial ground on the petitioner's land has been dropped. Alternatively, an extent of 0.12 guntas of Government land in sy. No. 304 was identified for the purpose and handed over to the Grampanchayat, Mandaloripalli, under cover of a panchanama dated

20.ll.2o2o by the Girdawar, Tekumatla Mandal. He submits that the petitioner has approached this court on assumptions and presumptions and since the 3.d respondent has already dropped the proposal to construct a burial ground on the petitioner's land, he prays for dismissal of the petition , I Page 3 of4

4. In the light of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, based on written instructions from the 3.d respondent and considering the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand dismissed //TRUE COPY/ SD/. M. TANT ON OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI P.DEVENDER, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GRAIVI PANCHAYAT [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies BSR GJP l-lr'1, \ \

1. tr"L lr l-ri .'i".. , 1 7 trfl 7I?5 (l;;411;r4 r -i^ + HIGH COURT DATED:11 l}gl2025 I a I ; I I t { t,i t' ORDER WP.No.1338 of 2020 i;.*tLrtitll;fi,.. li.tf,. I!!tt,rila. $t .tl 1r f{It DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION . tiri INFRUCTUOUS, *l:t; :J WITHOUT COSTS 6)w it-! ':i .! !, I l. , I i I ; , f I .t.t "t,i