✦ High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Feb 2025
Length
1,372 words

Acts & Sections

Rep by_ its pubhc_prosecutor, High court Buildings, Ghanpur (W), Jangoan Distriit. ...RESPONDENT No. 1/COMPLAINANT 2. Devasani Suresh, S/o yadagrrr. Age 40 years, Occ. RMp, R/o. lppagudem of ...RESPONDENT No. 2/DEFACTO COMPLATNANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crrminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against pdtitioner/Accused No.3 in c.c. No. 1973 oI 2022 on the file of the Additionat Junior civit Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class (Juvenile court), at Jangoan, utsec. 411 , 420 rlw 34 lPC, in terms of compromise. LA. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against petitioner/Accused No.3 in c.c. No. 1973 of 2o22 on the fire of the Additional Junior civir Judge-cum- Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court), at Jangoan. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Devasani Suresh, S/o. Yadagrri, Age.40 years, Occ. RMp, R/o. lppagudem of Ghanpur (W), jangoan District. AND ... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. 2/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

1. Pamu Shankar Linqam S/o Pamu Rama Chandram Aqe. 55 Vears. Occ Business, R/o H N-o 13-1-szt1lt3os, e,ronitrir.ri[ai LrJr", iJ"6]'ii,i.p1trr Chaitanyapuri ,Jotony, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy Diitrict. ...pETtTtONER/ACCUSED No. 3 2 Ihg S^late.of T:tangana,,Rep by^rts-public prosecutor. Hrgh Court Buildings, ...RESPONDENT No. 1/COMpLAtNANT Hrgh Court. Hy,ierabad. through SHO, p.S Ghanpur (W) Jingoan Petition under sectron 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances staled in the Arlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and Respondent no.2/De facto complainant to compromise the case in c c No. 1923 of 2022 on the file of the Additional Junior civil J udge-cum-Add itiona I Judiciat Magistrate of First class r'Juvenile court), at Jangoan, registered L,/Sec.417, 420 rlw 34 lpC. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under {lection 359 (2) of BNSS praying that iir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromrse by quashing the proc,:edings against the petrtioner/Accused no 3 in c.c. No. .1 973 of 2022 on the file of the Additionat Junior civil Judge-cu'n-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class (Juvenile Court), at Jangoan. registered U/Sec. 417, 42O rlw 34 lpC. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal [)etition and upon hearing the arguments of sri M. Arun Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner, pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No. '1 and of Mis yenuka Nishitha Manvi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the fo owing: ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.627 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused No.3 to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.1973 of 2022 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court) at Janagaon, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417,420 r/w 34 of lPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the mafter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the I I offences.

3. Mde order dated 28.01.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 31 01 .2025 and the same is placecl on record.

5. ln vrew of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 1l.025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.iJ in c.c No.1g73 of 2022 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge_cum_Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court) at Janagaon, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed \ To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/.. L. LAKSHMI BABU REGISTRAR ASS \'.i' Jsecrroru oFFrcER 1 ) 3 4 6 The Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court), at Jangoan The Vll Additional JLrdicial First Class Magistrate at Warangal. The Station Ho -rse Officer, Ghanpur (W) Police Station, .langoan District One CC to Srr M. Arun Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to firlls Yenuka Nishitha Manvi, Advocate 1OeUC1 Two CD Copies (Along with a ccrpy of joint memo of compromise) \ vi{ I .F.,v. \'r, . - it:-.-:!l!! t \, J *ii EP E.' ria.-?' 'I HIGH COURT DATED: 0510212025 \ \, ,t 1',1 rt:t 2W : z l s &{rCxEO * COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.627 ot 2O25 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION 'C -:). r#qHffii-'-.!;'::t . li ORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (Fi1ed Under Sec.359 (6) of B.N.S.S) E HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Crl.P.No. of2024 een: u Shankar Lingam, /o. Pamu Rama Chandram, Age: 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 13-1-52l 18/305, Prabhath Nagar, Near Ganga Hospital, Chaitanyapuri Colony, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. ..Petitioners/Accused No. 3 I 2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buiidings, High Court, Hyderabad, through SHO, P.S Ghanpur (W), Jangoan. ...Respondent No. 1 /Complainant Devasani Suresh, S/o. Yadagiri, Age: 4O years, Occ: RMP, R/o. Ippagudem of Ghanpur (W), Jangoan District. .. Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant MOU AND JOINT MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

1. It is submitted that the petitioner herein filed the above quash petition seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 1973 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Additional Junior Civil Judge- cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juveniie Court), at Jangoan, r c'gisterecl U/ Sec 417, 42O rlw 3t IPC, whe petitioner is figurc'd as Accused no.3

2. It is hL mblv submitted that the 2"d R:spondent/ Defacto complainant and the petitioner herein clos,:ly reiated family menrbers ern, I h:n,c' settled the disputes emicably and the Petitioner anr I thr:-v have agreed to settle the oresent dispute in C.C. No. 197? of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Additional Junior Civil Judge cum Additional Judicial Magistratr-' of First Class (Juvenile Corrrt), :rt Jangoan, registered U/Sec 417, 42O rlw 34 IPC,, before t ; ris I lon'ble High Court. As such they have filed a petition see l< ing this Hon'ble High Court to record the compromise. lhe contents mentioned in the said compromise petition are tl ue and correct to the best of ottr knowledge and belief. The sail cornpromise is entered with frer: rvill and consent and without a ny coercion. Hence, we are filin6, the present joint Memo It is ther,:forc'prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit thc petitroner and 2"d Respondent/ Defzrcto complainant herein by rt:crrrding compromise and by allor,r'ing the Criminal petition filed bv thc petitioners against C.C. No. 1973 of 2022 on the file of tlre l-[on'ble Additional Junior t)iviI Judge-cum Additional Juclicial Magistrate of First Class (Jrrvenile Court), at reglstered U/Sec. +lZ, +2O r/w 34 I r or orders as this Hon,ble Court raay in t]le circumstarces of the case. \s |..,1 . aqtrit E Petitioner yderabad, t.+J1.2024 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS a 2od Defac ent/ to complainant Hyderabad, Dt.?11.2024 COUNSEL FOR THE PONDNET NO.z tY ,*:,. ( :. i

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments