It4/S. B.V.Krishna Rao v. The State Of A.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri tMD Saleem, Advocate for the Petitioner, and the Public Prosecutor (AP) for the Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No: 2 to 4 herein to show cause as to why this Criminal Appeal should not be admitted. You viz
Asuthosh lvlisra, S/o K.C.lt4isra, lr4anaging Director, M/s. Essem Constructions P\rt. Ltd., Occ: Business, Rl/o Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State.
Asuthosh ltilisra, S/o K.C.lr/isra, Business, R/o Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State.
Manathosh Misra, S/o K.C.Misra, Business, R/o Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State. are directed to show cause on or before 01.10.2018 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the appeal and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed)this Criminal Appeal should not be admitted. The Court made the followinq ORDER: lssue fresh notice to the respondents. Personal service by RPAD is permitted on the respondents and file proof of service. Post on 01.10.2018. ,TRUE COPY' ASSISTAN 5d/-'t. SR}NI\.AS .I RAI{ T REGI -t FoT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. Asuthosh l\,4isra, S/o K.C.Misra, Itrlanaging Director, It4/s. Essem Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Occ: Business, R/o Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State.
2. Asuthosh Misra, S/o K.C.l\/isra, Business, R/o Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State. 3. I\,4anathosh Ir,4isra, S/o K.C.l\/isra, Business, Rio Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State. (RR 1 to 3 by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds) 4, One CC to Sri. l\,4 D Saleem, Advocate[OPUC].
Two CCs to Sri. Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court at Hyderabad[OUT].
One spare copy. HIGH COURT TR,J DATED: 1010912018 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION POST ON 01.10.02018. CRLA.No.598 of 2007
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.