✦ Telangana High Court · 20 Jan 2026

It//s. Srinivasa Service Station v. Deputy State Tax Officer, O/o Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes), Warangal-Urban-lll Circle, Warangal

Writ Petition No. 1460 of 2026APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G M MOHIUDDIN4 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
20 Jan 2026
Bench
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G M MOHIUDDIN

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. The instant Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order, as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed \ //TRUE COPYII SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFIGER The Deputy. State. Tq gffiqgr, o/o Assistant commissioner (state…

Judgment

Cause title

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of 1s Respondent dated 22.02.2023 and consequently direct the 1't Respondent to Revive the GST Registration portal of the petitioner GST No. 36AFMPB4439F1ZK, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition as othenryise the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and ha.rdship. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K P AMARNATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX The Court made the following: ORDER rB :a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGT{ AND THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No.1460 of 2026 Dated. 20.01.2026 Between: M/s. Srinivasa Service Station Deputy State Tax Officer, O/o. Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes), Warangal-Urban-I[I Circle, Warangal Division, Telangana, and2 others. ... Petitioner

Respondents

ORDER:

Learned counsel Sri K.P.Arnarnath Reddy appears for thc petitioner Sri Sr.varoop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for the respondents

2.

The GST registration certificate of the petitioner bearing No.36AFMPB4439F IZK was cancelled vide impugned order passed in FORM GST REG-19 dated 22.02.2023 for non-filing ofl rerurns fbr a 2 continuous period of six months. The petitioner preferred a time-barred appeal against the order of cancellation of registration certificate which has been dismissed on the ground of delay. Thereafter, the petitioner has Iiled the ittstant Writ Petition for rcvocatiotl of cancellation of GST registration certi fi cate.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no GST dues left to be paid by the petitioner. [t is subrnitted that non-filing of returns rvas tbr the reason that the proprietor of the petitioner has cornpletely relied upon the Mattagcr {br Frling of the monthly returns and it was also unaware ol the show cause notice and there was no intentional delay. 1'hough the petitioner has sought to file an application for revocation o{' cancellation of GST registration certificate but the GST portal docs not permit the petitioner as being beyond the time limit prescribed for submission. Therefore, he prays that respondent No.1 rnay be directed to entertaitr the petitioner's application manually and take a decision thcreupon iu accordance with law.

4.

Learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax submits that he does not have instruction on the assertion that no outstanding dues remain against the petitioner. He, however, submits that the apparent reason for cancellation of GST registration certificate was on account of \ non-frling of returns for the continuous period of six months. I 3

5.

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also taking note of the fact that the GST registration certificate of the petitioner was cancelled on account of non-filing o[' returns for the continuous period of six months, if the petitioner approaches the competent authority rvithin a period of one week from today fcrr submission of application f,or revocation of cancellation of GST registration certificate, in physical form, the competent authority would entertain it and take a decision thereupon in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereafter.

6.

The instant Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order, as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed \ //TRUE COPYII SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFIGER The Deputy. State. Tq gffiqgr, o/o Assistant commissioner (state Taxes), Warangal-Urban-tll Circle, Warangal Division, Telinoina. The Appellate Joint commissionei 1sr;, punjagutti bivision, Hyderabad. The secreta ry to Govern ment ( reveh ueii cr- [t, biiieTaieslboid;; I I axes Department Secretariat, Hvderabad. One CC to SRl. K. P. AMARNATH RLDDY, Advocate tOpUCI Two CCs to SPECIAL GoVERNMENT PLEADER ToR STniE TAX, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad fOUn Two CD Copies To, 1 2 3

4. 5.

6. BM LS € / .?.\ HES I o(, ? I lrll 2$l[ -/ I * -:i a'i t. l HIGH COURT DATED iz0l0112026 ORDER WP.No.1460 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS q \ ?x

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 19(1Xg), 226; Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 — s. 37(5); Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Telangana High Court, on 20 Jan 2026. The bench was APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G M MOHIUDDIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1460 of 2026). ← Search more judgments