High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 2m of IE constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, oder or direction especially one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.s not to entertain any registrations in respect of the deeds presented by Respondent No O in respect of the land which was mutated in favour of Respondent M.6 iltegally to an extent of Ac.1-10 Gts., covered by Sy.No.312 situated at Dabeerpur Village' Medchal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri Distfict, Telangana state till the Revision case filed by the petitioner on 13tO3l2O2O before the Respondent No.3 is numbered and taken upforhearingbytheRercnueTribunalconstitutedintermsofG'o.MS.No.4,dated 'l2t}1l2)21 of Revenue (Assignment-l) Department, Government of Telangana there by declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in enterta I ing registrations of the subiect property pending the revision filed by the petitionet ts illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and against the rrovisions of The Telangana Rights ln Land And Pattadar Pass Books Act,20:l 'and rules framed there under in the wake of tribunals constituted in terms of thr: above G-O., which have not yet started functioning fully and effectively and ars not taking up the cases for hearing. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circt mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may re pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 not to entertain any registrations i,] respect of deeds presented by Respondent No.6 in respect of the land which we ; mutated in favour of Respondent No.6 illegally to an extent of Ac.1-10 Gts., cc,t ered by Sy.No.312 situated at Dabeerpur Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana State pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. J.SWATHI REDDY FOR SRI 1: SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR REVENUI: Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - W.P.NO: '1462OF 2021 Between:

1. A.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o.Lakshma Reddy, Aged atx ut 60 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o-H.No- 1-203, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Iedchal Town and Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana State-501 101

2. A.Mohan Reddy, S/o.Lakshma Reddy, Aged about 62 ye trs, Occ Agriculture, Rlo.H.No.'l -203, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Medchal Town e rd Mandal, Medchal Malkalgiri District, Telangana State-501401

3. A.Sriram Reddy, S/o.Lakshma Reddy, Aged about 70 ye rrs, Occ Agriculture, F/o.H.No. l-203, Vinayak Nagar Colony. Medchal Town z rd Mandal, Medchal Malka.igiri District, Telangana State-501401

4. A.Malla Reddy, S/o.Lakshma Reddy, Aged about 53 y,-'trs, Occ Agriculture, Rlo.H.No.l-203, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Medchal Town t rd Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana State-501401 ...PET|T|ONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep. by il ; Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Keerr rra, Telangana State 3. The Joint Collector, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Keesar, , Telangana State

4. Ttre Revenue Divisional Officer, Keesara Revenue Division, lvledchal 5. The Thhasildar, O/o.Mandal Revenue ffice, Medchal Mandal, Medchal MaH<ajgiri District, Telangana State Ma{kajgiri District, Tetrangana State

6. A.Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o.Lakshma Reddy, Aged about 5J years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o.H.No.1-39, RTC Colony, Medchal Town, A/ledchal Malkajgiri District' Telangana state-so14ol ...RES'.NDENT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutbn of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Nlo.4 and 5 not to entertain any registrations in respect of deeds presented by Respondent No.6 and not to grant permission under NALA Act to the Respondent No.6{o change the use of land in respect of the land which was mutated in favour of Respondent No.6 illegally and excessively to an exlent of Ac.0-29 Gts., covered by Sy.M.85 situated at Dabeerpur Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana State till the Revision case and lnterlocutory application filed by the petitioners on 13.O3.2O20 before the Respondent M.3 is numbered and {aken up for hearing by the Revenue Tribunal constituted in terms of G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 12-O1.2s21 of Revenue (Assignment-l) Department, Government of Telangana there by declaring the action of the respondent t',1'o.5 in entertaining registrations of the subject property pending the revisbn filed by tfe petitkmers as ill'egal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and against the provisions of The Telangana Rights ln Land And Pattadar Pass Books P&t,2020 and rules framed there under in the wake of tribunals constitrled in terms of the above G.O , which have not yet started functioning fully and effectively and are not taking up the cases for hearing. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 Crc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rnay be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 and 5 not to entertain any rcgistrations in respect of deeds presented by Respondent No.6 and not to grant perfirission under NALA Act to the Respondent No.6 to change the use of laM in respect of the land which was mutated in favour of Respondent No.6 illegally and excessively to an extent of Ac.O-2gGts.,coveredbySy.No.85situatedatDabeergtrVillage'Medchal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana state pendine disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. J.SWATHI REDDY FOR SFI E'SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FORREVENUE Counsel for the ResPondent No.6: The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL RUMAR.,(II{ANTI WRIT PETIT ION Nos.14 60 AND 1462or. 2o21 COMMO N ORDER: W.P.No.l46O of 2O2t is filed with the following prayer: ". . to issue appropriate [lt, oraer or- direction especially one in the nature of a \4 Respondent il. ; ;,i;':':;l Hff::*HTHf"T :::p""1 "l the deeds presented by R.;p;;-d";i;r;; ln respecr of the land which was mutat?J in--i"""L or R_espondenr No.6 illegajly to an extent "f A". i. i6;"., covered by Sy.No.3 12 "1,::r:d.it Dabe;;;; V;;g., Medchal Mandal, Medchat Ma.lkajgiri ni"t i"t }"frierrr. state till the Revision .""" & il?;i;;;;,";;r*#o"" I.d by the peririoner on 13.03.2020 *f*. ",ii Respondent No.3 is numbered and tut"., ,p i". fa.rirrg !f - qe Revenue Tribunar constituted in terms of G o. Ms. No.4, d,ated t2.o t.2o2 I "iR;;;;;" A"""LrlL, I) Department, Government of telangJna-:,fr*.Uy declaring the action of the ."";;;;:;* N;;' _ enterlajning regisrralions of tne suu;ect prof ".V n""ia_g the revision liled by rhc perrtroner as illegal, arbitrary, viola.tive of principles of natural justice and against the prorisions of rhe Telargana Righis _ r.i?.ioaa Passbooks Act. 2020 ,ra nrt"" f.r_.t;;..*;;;.; _ the^ wake of tribunats consrituted in i;;;;;,#;;*" G.O., which have not yet started f"r."Uo"i.rg ?"UV ,ra effectively and are not tal<ing up the cases i". n-J_irg and pass such other order or orders as this Flonble C-ourt may deemed fit and proper in the circum?r..." .f the case. - -Lr-rlJ

2. W.P.No. 1462 of 2O2l is frled with the following prayer: "... to._ issue appropriate wrll, especially one in ttre nature of a directing the Respondent Nos_4 & 5 order or directirn Writ of mandamus not to entertain a,:Iy 2 JAK, J W.P It t::.146O & 1462 2021 registrations in respect of the deeds pres: Respondent No.6 and not lo grant permissi,, NALA Act to the Respondent No.6 to change tr land in respect of the land which was mutated i of Respondent No.6 illegally and excessively to a of Ac.O.29 Gts., covered by Sy.No.85 sit.t Dabeerpur Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal lv District, Telangana State till the Revision ,: Interlocutory application hled by the petrtir 13.O3.2O2O before the Respondent No.3 is numb, talen up for hearing by the Revenue Tribunal cor in terms of G.O.Ms.No.4, d.a\ed l2.Ol.2O2l ttf (Assignment-I) Department, Government of 'li thereby declaring t.I:e action of the respondent entertaining registrations of the subject propert'/ the revision hled by the petitioner as illegal. a violative of principles of natural justice and aE,z provisions of the Telangana fughts in Land ancl Passbooks Act, 2O2O and Rules lramed therc r the wake of tribunals constituted in terms of I I G.O., which have not yet started functioning f effectively and are not taking up the cases for and pass such other order or orders as thir; Court may deemed fit and proper in the circum:;t the case." rted by L -under : use of r favour r extent lted at alkaj giri se and ner on red and s,tituted ?evenue lalgana No.S in pending titrary, inst the )attada.r nder in e above LIly ald hearing I{on'ble lnces of

3. Interim order was granted on l8.O2.2)tl in both the writ petitions. The docket reflects that the nterim order granted earlier was extended up to 30.06.2021. Subsequently, the matters were again listed on 1O.O9,2025, but no directions are issued afte ' 30.06.2021 extending the interim order granted on 18.02 : O2 1

4. Today, it is represented by Ms. J. S;' ,,athi Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. E. Srir ivas Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners, that O.S.Nos 118 of 2022 // /., // n l J JAK, J W.P.Nos.146O & 1462 2O2i and 128 of 2022 are flled with respect to the properties before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Medchal Malkajgiri District, by petitioners for partition against respondent No.6. The petitioners in W.p.No.1462 of 2O2l are plaintiffs and respondent No.6 is the defendalt in the suit. It is submitted that an order of status quo has been granted (neither the copies of plaint nor the interim order granting 'sfafus quo" are presented before this Court). 5 There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.6.

6. Be that as it may, since Ms. J. Swathi Reddy, learned counsel, furnished the details of the suits and it is represented that the subject properties are the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that parallel proceedings cannot go on with respect to the same subject properties, suits are lrled subsequently in the year 2022.

7. l.earned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to n,ithdraw the rn rit petitions.

8. Permission is accorded 4 JAK, J w 1 t\os.1460 & 1462 2021

9. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to cos s. Miscellaneous applications pending, il any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// I (*;r To t , liiac;t" cp?6ii'ii'ever.rue, High court r"rin" 8?1 1. 9n" CC to SRI E.SR|NIVAS REDDY, Advocate IOpl 3. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. IOUT1 D/- B.REKHA RANI ANT REGI CTION OFF]CER of Telangana, at PSK. BSR &* I I HIGH COURT DATED:1 110912025 I COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.1460 AND 1462 ot 2021 /; ,,ct,o l'. :.- ti'+ \\ (\ ,\ 1HE SI4 g t1[[ )fl7 z- (ir ), a : )!,;praarre! * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS -JKS z*1.1,"