Ghulam Raheemuddin v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.4717 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be one of the shareholders in respect of the land comprised in Survey Nos.40 and 41 corresponding to new Survey No.5 situated at Muqadamguda, Alijapur, Medak District. It is his case that he applied for certified copies of Muntaqab in File No.1/56 of 1339 Fasli in May 2006, in vain. Therefore he seeks a direction. After perusing the affidavit accompanying the Writ Petition and the material papers annexed thereto, this Court is not able to countenance the locus of the petitioner to file the Writ Petition. If the petitioner has any grievance regarding non-furnishing of Muntaqab, it is always open to him to take necessary action under the Right to Information Act, 2005. In this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India a direction cannot be issued to the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration. The Writ Petition, with the above observation, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
08.03.2007
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right to Information Act, 2005; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 08 Mar 2007. The bench was V V S RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.