The High Court · 2025

ana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AND 2 Muniganti Aishwarya, W/o.J annam Kartheek, D/o. Sreenivas, Aged 33 years, Occ. Private Employee, Ryo Quarter No.A10, Bungalows Area, CCC Township Mancherial Town Mancherial District ...Respondent / Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the l{igh Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/Ac(:used No.1_g in Cr. No.0712024 on the file of women Police station srirampur, I\Iarcheriat District. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High ,Oourt may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitionr:rs/Accused No.1-g pursuant to cr. No.07l2024 on the file of women police station Srirampur, Mancherial District. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Smt Aishwarya Muniganti, W/o.J annam Kartheek, D/o. Sr,:enivas, Aqed 33 years, Occ..Private Employe-e, R/o euarter No.A10. Burg: lo*s nlea]CbC lownship Mancherial Town Mancherial District ...petitioner / Complainant AND 1. state of relangana, Rep. by its pubric prosecutor High court of Judicature at Hyderabad ...Respon Cent / Respondent 2. Kartheek Jannam, S/o. Br€hmanandam Jannam, aged 35 years, Occ. private !mp..foyeg, Ryo..H.No. l0-1-104, Gandhi Cnowk {oict, ftanammeO fisim Basti, Bellampalli, Mancherial Distrrct Telangana

3. Renuka Janlqf, W/o Bramhanandam Jannam Aged 53 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o H.No.10-1-104, Gandhi Chowk, Beilairpaili, [Aancneiiir Oiiirict Telangana 4. Bramhanandam Jannam, S/o Venkataramaiah Jannam A(led 56 vears Occ 9ovt Emptoyee Ryo H No.10-1-.104. Gandhi Cnowr, eerriimparii 'tiininEriii District Telangana

5. Vamshi Knshna Jannam, S/o Bramhanandam Jannam A(red 31 vears. Occ PIVate Empotyee. R/o H.No.10-1_104. Gandhi Ciowk, 'gettampaltl, Mancherial District Telangana

6. Madupu Swathi, Wo Madupu Sai Krishna, Aged 33 years Occ. House Wife. -trtancfreiLf --Oi'siii] R/o 11-113, Harijana Waila, Utnoor, Utno6r tvtaniiii Telangana

7. Madupu Sai Krishna. Aoed 35. years, Occ. Busrness Nc, 11-113, HarUana Wada, Utnoor. Utnoor Mindal. n ''laO . Tlf an-gana-

8. Jannam Sathyanarayana, S/o Venkata Ramaiah Jannam Aged 53 yea1s, Occ- Business Ryo '10-3-73, MD Kasim Basthi, Bellampalle, Mancherial District, Telangana

9. Jannam Bhaskar, S/o Venkata Ramaiah Jannam Aged 49 years, Occ. Business Fl/o 10-1-104, MD Kasim Basthi, Bellampalle, Mancherial Diskict Telangana ...Respondents / Accused No 1-8 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offence under Section 498-4, 506 of IPC and Sec 3 and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 in Cr.No-07/2024 on the file of Woman Police Station Srirampur, Mancherial District. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Smt Aishwarya Muniganti, W/o.J annam Kartheek, D/o. Sreenivas, Aged 33 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o Quarter No.A10, Bungalows Area, CCC Township Mancherial Town Mancherial District ...Petitioner / Complainant AND 1- Kartheek Jannam, S/o. Brahmanandam Jannam, aged 35 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o.H. No.10-1-104, Gandhi Chowk Road, Mahammed Kasim Basti, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana

2. Renuka Jannam, Wo Bramhanandam Jannam Aged 53 years, Occ. House Wife, Rl/o H.No.10-'1-104, Gandhi Chowk, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana

3. Bramhanandam Jannam, S/o Venkataramaiah Jannam Aged 56 years, Occ. Govt Employee Ryo H.No.10-1-104, Gandhi Chowk, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana

4. Vamshi Krishna Jannam, S/o Bramhanandam Jannam Aged 31 years, Occ. Private Empolyee, R/o H.No.10-1-104, Gandhi Chowk, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana

5. Madupu Swathi, Wo Madupu Sai Krishna, Aged 33 years, Occ, House Wife, R/o 11-1 13, Harijana Wada, Utnoor, Utnoor Mandal, Mancherial District Telangana

6. Madupu Sai Krishna, Aged 35 years, Occ- Business R/o 11-1 13, Harijana Wada, Utnoor, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad, Telangana

7. Jannam Sathyanarayana, S/o Venkata Ramaiah Jannam Aged 53 years, Occ. Business Rio 10-3-73, MD Kasim Basthi, Bellampalle, Mancherial District, Telangana

8. Jannam Bhaskar, S/o Venkata Ramaiah Jannam Aged 49 years, Occ. Business Rr/o 10-1-104, MD Kasim Basthi, Bellampalle, Mancherial District Telangana ...Respondents i Accused No 1-8 9. qtate of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Higlr C turt of Judicature at Hyderabad ...Respor dent / Respondent Petition under Section 359 (2) rlw 528 of BNSSi praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirnin ll petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise arrived at betv/een the parties i.e. the de-facto complainant and petitioners and to quash the proc,:edings against the petitioners/Accused No.1-8 in Cr.No.O7l2024 on the file of '/Voman police Station Srirampur, Mancherial District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing th-i Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri Shreyas Reddy Yalagiri, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additiona public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K Rajashekar Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following Common Order : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos. 3 and 4 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITI ONNo.541 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to B to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.7 of 2Q24 of Police Station, Srirampur- WPS (Ramagundam), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 4984, 506 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the

2. petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l-A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound I I the offences.

3. Vide order daled 27.01.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Higlr Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties an<l submitted a report, dated 04.02.2025 and the same is placed on recorcJ.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2Ct2t are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos..l 1o g in Crime No.7 of 2024 of Police Station, Srirampur_WpS (Ramagundam), are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/.V. HARI PRASAD ASSIS'TANT REGISTRAR ,l I;ECTION OFFICER Ramagundam District 1 . The I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at, Mzrncherial ;. i';; !1;6; House officer, Srirampur wPS (Ramagundan ) PS e ii"'CU. i" the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Stat') of Telangana' 4 lj;;6i; i;i sn,"vas Reddv Yalasiri' Advoc€te 5 o;; ac to sri K Raiashekar, Advocate [oPUc] 6. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad IOUT] [oPL c] Along with the Copy of the Joint Memo of Compromise \ To, VNkam 6 t.:i E ;rrl .?, HIGH COURT DATED:1010212025 COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 in / and CRLP.No.S41 of 2025 1 r\t- ST47 e (F( c' J t 7+ \ :tB 2025 12 ki"=-_ :rrTCts 'r t, I l + ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 "hrw IN THE HIGH COURT OE UDICATURE OF TELANGANA ar Hvobnaeao I Crl.P.No. of2025 l I 2 3 4 ) 6 Between: l4qrry1*rt{n-&z..a6'r, L- Kartheekfu, S/o. Brahmanandam Jannam, aged 35 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o.H.No. 10-1-104, Gandhi chowk Road, Mahammed KaSim Basti, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana. Renuka Jannam, Wo Bramhanandam Jannam Aged 53 years, Occ: house wife, R/o H.no.10-1-104, Gandhi chowk, Bellamp.alli, Mancherial District Telangana. Bramhanandam Jannam,'S/o Venkataramaiah Jannam Aged 56 yijars,Occ; Govt Employce R/o H.no.l0-l-104, Gandhi chow[:; Bellampiilli, Manch'erial District Telangana. Vamshi Kiishna'Jannam S/o Bramhanandam Jannam Aged 3 I years, Occ:private empolyee, Rio H.no.10-1-104, Gandhi chowk, Bellampalli, Mancherial District Telangana. Madupu Swathi, Wo Madupu Sai Krishna, Aged 33 years,Occ: house wife, R/o 11-113, Harijana Wada, Utnoor, Utnoor Mandal, Mancherial District Telangana. Madupu Sai Krishna, Aged: 35 years, Occ:Business R/o I 1- I 13, Harij ana Wada, Utnoor, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad, Telangana. I 7 8 1 2 Jannarn Sathyanarayana S/o Venkata'Ramaiah Jannatn Aeed : 53 Ycars' Occ:Business ii['jo 1 -i MD Kasim basthi' bellarnpalle' Mancherial D istrict, Telangana' .lannam Bhasl<ar S/o Venkata Ramaiah Jannam ,t.^d ' J9 v!'ars- Occ:Business olTrn-r roq MD Kasim basthi' bellampalle' Manchcrial District Telangana. ' "Petitioners/Accuse d No' [-8 AND State of Telangana Reo. by its Public Prosecutor Hiif, Corn ofJudicature at Telangana' Muniganti Aishwarya' Wo'Jannam Kartheek' .)l"i*"rlr.t. neeA rf years, Occ: Private Emplo5'ee ili"q;;, No.e i-0. Bungalows Area' CCC Township- Mancheriat Town Manchena fjft"rci .. RespondenL&.espondent I''espondent/Complainant OINT MEM J ti, ORAND ANDT UM FILED B HE RESPOND ENT YTHEP NO.2 E'IITIO NERS The petitionersare accused No' 1-8 in Crime No' O7 't2OZ4' on the file of Woman police station Srirampur, Mancherial Distrist and being cha:ged under Sections49S - A, 506 of IPC & Sec 3 & 4 Dowry Prohibition Act 1961'' It is submitted that de-facto complainant has filed a complaint before the court ofthei,.AddlJudicialMagistrateoftheFirstClassMagistral,e,MancherialStatingthat her marriage was performed on 09'08'2020 with the pelitioner/Accused No l in presence ol elders and tamily members at bungalows 'Art:a Community hall' CCC NaspurColonv,N4ancherialDistrict'subsequentlyduetoirreconcilabledifferences' thepetitionerandthedefactocomplainanthavebeenlivinp'sepatately'itispertinent to note here that no children were bom out from this Inarriage' after which the petitioner herein had filed a suit for Divorce, which subsequently amended into a divorce bymutual consent after gntering into an Mou dated 1g.12.2024. rn the meanwhile the above mentioned criminal case was filed by the defacto complainant on the file of woman Police Station Sriralnpur, Mancherial District and being charged under Sections4gS -A, 506 of IpC & Sec 3 & 4 Dowry prohibition Act 1961 vide cr. No.07 of 2024. It is submitted that while the samswas pending, my well-wished as well as the society elders have brokered peace between the de-facto complainant myself and few other accused all ofus have arrived at a compromise the terms of whichare as under: a. b c The. Petitioner Accused No.i anA the defacto complainant have agreed and decided that after the execution of the settlement deed, both parties will appear and provide evidence for the mutual consent divorce petition belore the Hon'ble Family Court Judge, Hyderabad District. or any other court with territorial jurisdiction, for dissolving their marriage dated 09.08.2020. and thereby obtain a valid divorcc decree. In pursuance of this Memorandum of Understanding, both the petitioner and defacto complainant undertake that they shall not initiate any further litigation before any court of law, nor shall they harass each other in the future through any legal proceedings. In pursuance of this Memorandum of Understanding, the defacto complainant agrees to withdraw the Restitution of Conjugal Rights Vide H.M.O.P. No. 374 ol 2024 on the file olHon'bte principal Senior Civil Judge at Mancherial and FIR No.7 of 2024 at Women pS CCC before granting the Mutual Consent Divorce petition d Both the parties have agreed to file the preseni application seeking quashment of Cr.No.07 of 2024 on the file of ' y'omanpolice Station Srirampur, Mancherial District in so far as the petit onerl,\ccused l_g are concerncd. I It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble court may be pleaserl to record the compromise arrived at between the parties i.e. the de-facto complainaRt and petitioners and to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/Accr:sed No.l-g in cr.No.07i2024 on the file ol woman police Station SriramPur. Mancherial District and to pass such other orders as are deemed fit and proper in rhe circumstances of the .fo Respondent No case. Peti ed No. I T.RQr.LLrKo. Petitioner/Accused No.2 -a1J lJa^ h--.-l-- Petitioner/Aceused No.3 Petitioner/Ac M d No.a Petitioner/Accused No. 5 C Petitio No.6 'S s:tnrd:--- Petitloner/Aee used No 7 Petitlonor/Aecused No. 8 Couns o eP Itlor ers Co I for the Re;pondent No.2 ------€.-