3 The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad v. Lalaguda No.2, Marredpally
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Jul 2009
- Bench
- V ESWARAIAH, P SWAROOP REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 24.3.2008 in O.A.No.2135 of 2008 and quash the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9174 of 2009
ORDER:
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) It is represented that this writ petition filed against the interim order is squarely covered by the principles laid down in the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.6249 of 2009, dated 19.06.2009. Following the ratio laid down in the above referred judgment, the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach he Tribunal by filing appropriate application to vacate the interim order. If any such application is filed, the said application and the contempt case, if any filed by the respondent, may be tagged together and disposed of, as expeditiously as possible, after hearing both the parties, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Dated: 06.07.2009 Dsr _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J ____________________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY,J .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To
2. 2CCs to 2. 2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Jul 2009. The bench was V ESWARAIAH, P SWAROOP REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.