✦ High Court of India · 09 Jan 2025

1. B. VEERANNA v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,003 words

Cited in this judgment

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Merndamus, to declare the inaction of the respondents in fixing the seniority of the petitioners notionally cum monitory benefits in the cadre of the SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SA) i.e. School Assistant in English, Maths and PED from the date of appointments as Teachers in DSC-2008, inspite of the written representation dates Ctgl12l2024 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional declare that the petitioners are entitled to be treated on par with the candidates who were selected and appointed in pursuance of DSC-2008 with all .consequential benefit:s, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Secl:ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for fixing the seniority of the petitioners notionally with monitory benefits in the cadre of the SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SA) i.e. School Assistant in English, Maths and PED from the date of 1st Appointment 0411112010 as Teachers in DSC-2008, as per the terms of reported judgmernt of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1998 (5) SCC 246 and 2008 (7) SCC 728, similar order passed by THE Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in WP No. 18479 of 2024, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. Y SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.1 o40 0F 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties' the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself'

2. This Writ Petition' under Article 226 of the Constitutionoflndia,isfiledseekingthefollowingreliet "...to issue an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction' more clf Writ of Mandamus' to declare oarticularly one in the "l't"tt ffi'r#"rJ"-.r tnt tt"frnJtnts in fixing the senioritv of the benelits in the. cadre of the oetitioners notionally "tltt"'*t"itr fiilIJi o"ilt";i;ai i ' ,'i't'"r''""i"tunt in English' Maths and PED from the date of tppoitttrn""t" as Teachers-in DSC-2O08' in ;a*.;r*:*,,1r.:T'ii:*J:?iii:1,.':;i'J3.','"1;fi "i'll: illegal, arbitrarY, unlus rre-titioners are entitled io Lt tt"ttta on par with the candidates in pursuance ot DSC-2o08 with f#;;;;td all consequential benefrts '" 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing' learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W'P'No'18479 of ""a 'Jptiti"J 2024, dated 15.07 '2024'

4. The sarne is not disputed by learned Government Pleader for Services-t' appearing for the respondents. l I i I I i I I I 7

5. Fo[lowing the said order and for the reasons statr:d therein, this Writ Petition is also disposed of rlirecting the respondent authorities to consider repre,sentations, dated 09. 72.2024, submitted by the petitioners for conferment of seniority of the petitioners on par with the candidates, who have been selected ancl appointed pursuant to DSC-2O08, in the light of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.21193 of 2017, dated tZ9.O6.2Ol7 and W.P.No.t494L of 2014, dated l3.O7.i'.O22 and pass appropriate orders, accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken thereon to the petitioners. Miscellaleous petitions if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall s;tand closed. ^ Sril-s.tvrlr-r-TKARJUNA RAo SI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secr,=tary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Director of School Education, Telangana State Hyderabad 3. The District Educalional Officer, Khammam, Khammam District. 4. The District Educalional Officer, Mulugu, Mulugu District. 5. The District Educalional Officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem Dist.

6. One CC to SRl. Y SURESH KUMAR Advocate tOpUCl Gr@' ' 8r"r"". to GP FOR SERV|CES t, High Court for the State of Tetangana. ,*o CD Copies ^*3. BSK LHV i 1 I , I I I HIGH COURT DATED:0910112025 ORDER WP.No.1040 of 2025 K l, /ra= -ifl€ s14 15 2 6 r{il 2025 t t -i, 5lr:1':l'.t ":) DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .\\k JV\ O'tV

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments