The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CrrminaI Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash'the SC No.84 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble Sessions Court for Trial of SC's and ST's Cases- cum- Vll Additional sessions judge at L.B.Nagar R.R. District against the petitioners /Accused 1 to 3 for the offence's U/s 376(2)(n), 417. 420,493, 506 LP.C and section.3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of ST's and STs POA Act 2015. l.A. NO: l OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings of the petitioners / Accused 1 to 3 SC.No.84 of 2021 on the frle of the Hon'ble Sessions Court for Trial of SC's and ST's Cases- cum- \/ll Additional sessions judge at L.B Nagar R.R District, pending disposal of tlte main case. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 359 (3) of BNSS praying that in the lircumstances stated in the Memorzrndum of Grounds of criminal Petltton. the H gh court may be pleased to recorrl the compromise in SC No.B4 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble Sessions .ludge at L.B. Nagar. R.R. District pending d sposal of the main case. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Bharathapuram Prashantha, D/o. Sadhanadam, Aged Occ. Pvt employe,r at present Rlo 2-10-41 , Phase l. Kapra, Cherlapally Medchal-Malkajgiri District-84 37 years l\tladiga caste, Street N().5, EC Nagar, Petitio n e r/Res po nde nt no.2 AND '1 . The State of 'felangana, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor High Court, Hyderabad, Through the Police Station Kushaiguda, Rachakon,la 2. Rakesh Cheela S/o. Late Srinivas. Aged 28 years, Occ. Hit Employee, 3. Veeramani, Wo Late Srinivas, Aged 50 years, Occ: Nil, 4. Cheela Malathi, D/o Cheela Srinivas, Aged 29 years, Occ. Pvt. l:mployee, All R/o. Plot No. 179, Old Vasavtnagar. Opposite I\/ahankali, Temple Karkhana, Sect nderabad. ..Respondents/Accused 'l to 3 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the :;ircumstances stated in the Memora ndum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the H,gh Court may be pleased to record .he compromise and quash the proceedings ir S.C.No 84 of 2021 on the file of thr: Hon'ble Sessions Court for Trial of SC's an'l ST's Cases- cum-Vll Additional se'sstons judge at L.B. Nagar R.R. District in:he interest of justice. This Petition ctming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal retition and upon hearing the arguments of l'rl/s. G. Durga Charan, Advocate fo- the Petitioners and the Addrtional Public l:)rosecutor on behalf of the Respon lent No.1 and of Sri Syed Asima Unnisa, Ad'rocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the f cllowing: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI. l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.470 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: . This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitionersiaccused Nos. l to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.84 of 2021 on the file of Sessibns Court for Trial of SCs/STs Cases-cum-Vll Additional Sessions Judge at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2),(n), 417,42O,493, 506 of IPC and Section 3(1Xr)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST POA Act, 2015.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order daled 27 .01.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. I , 2

4. Pursrrant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services C cmmittee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 29.01 .2025 and the same is placed on rec;ord ln vie ,w of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed

5. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceeding ; against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in S.C.No.84 of 2021 on the file of Sessions Court for Trial of SCs/STs C rses-cum-Vll Additional Sessions Judge at i-.B.Nagar, Ranga RedCy District, are hereby quashed lVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 't', ' ^\ \\i \eclon oFFtcER \

1. The Sessions C;ourt for Trial of SC's and ST's Cases cunr Vll Additional ' i"It"."t Jrclge at L B Nagar R R Distrtct 2. The Station House Officer' Kushaiguda Police Station Rachakonda Commissioner; tte.

3.TwoCCstotl.ePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStatetlfTelanganaat Hyderabad [O-rT]

4. One CC to M/; G Durga Charan' Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Syed Asima Unnisa' Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise)

1.. I .\ 4tl H p- HIGH COURT DATED:04102;2025 r r1.i s-l-,

3. o ,,. (lt.,,r\. COMMON ORI)ER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRLP.No.470 'tf 2025 i) \1i '\.1 0 I p,p,, a)i-.1. o. ., +\ir- \lw\ ?.ii ,.- ,,r:t/ BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARI: ALLOWED IE 't.r/ & ./r 1 2 a rN,rHE uoNsrB ntcu 9;nu$$ffirHP STATtr OF TELANGANA Crl.P.No L,{a, IN' ' SC No' a4 of2O2i (on the fil'"'ot th' Ho"'ur'-E'"]ro'i" i""" t9f l:i.'i8""#l =t" t"" ";;;;- cum- VII Additiqnal sessions judS of 2025 l R.R. District) ^"n"ela' Between: S/o' Iate Sr:inivas . ?"rl"n o99' .9r,1t,9mP1ov':-' l eg;a, ?Ar."d9 CH,Veerarnarii, W/o.late Srinivas i ' Aged 5O Years, Occ:Nil Cheela Malathi, D/o Cheela Srinivas' -ieiazs yea4s, oqg:'Pvt employee All R/o. Plot No' 179' Old Vasavinagar' opposite Mahankari' '';;;; il;;khLa' s'cundil?,lll"=I Accused 1 3 AND -felorlYartct t The State of floa#a P+#csh ' R;; BY its Public Prosecutor' n iet' co"tt' Hv9'"t"br*"n Through the Poltce s Kush a i guda' Ra chako nd a , ,r prashantha, D/o. Sadhanadam,

2. Smt.BharathaPurarr " ;; 3i ,ears Madiga caste' occ Pvt employee' li".*",1i[l o z-tol+t' Phase [' street No 5' ;".IN;;. KaPra, cherlaPallY' il"i.rr-"r rtrrtkajgiri District' .... Respondents / De-facto compiainant JOINTMEMOFILED BY BOTHPARTIES

1. rhe Petitioners herein submit *":l:"1,:i,,;fii:;:H#Tlfl case to quash the proceedings pending rn ir lile of the Hon,ble o.r""," ;:i#i:;r;:^".::".'". fill;:'ar 'rsc's anc s's cases- 1 to 3 for the or*'** 42O, 4g3,aou ,..0.,"'""d section'"'r,"iT, ;-ll; :1.i','J"* :ll poA Act ,orr, *iand complainant, nu. r.'"tttt R'R' D;strict against the Respondenl

2. The petitioner dged a **;;;;;"1;: *',',::,,:l: that during the penc of both parties nrr." " o1o * h ave ami c r b;:H:: i*J:::ili::j:" ;;- . :,iil. to the litigation in the best interest.r*" *r' decided to put an end ure of both the parties. rs th e refore prayed that this Hon entior Led reasons may be pl trle Court or;. the basis eased to record the d tJre Responrlent No.2 d pass such other order or order.s as this proper in t-he crrcumsta_nces Hence of the aforem compromise entered I )etween the pedtioners in the interest of justice an Hon trie Court deems lii and Rakesh Cheela (petiti,rner no.S/At) dq f>-r4 Veeramani (petitioner no.z / All V g€ fqulh I Cheela Malathi (petitic rrer no.3 / A3)iw@ of tLe case >Z SMT BhaIa apuram pr.ashantha (De-fac to Complai nant) "ou*ru?" OR THE PE]ITIONERS ;I+B:'Tfiffi^, COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENI.No.2