High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayang that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in seeking to demolish/dispossess the petitioners thatched huts in ptot nos. 38, 25, 39, 62, 01 situated in Sy.No.48/A1 at Kollure Village, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy District as being illegal, arbitrary, highly unreasonable, in violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of / lndia and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession over the said house plots. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish/dispossess the petitioners from house plot nos.38, 25, 39, 62, 01 situated in Sy.No.48/Al at Kollure Village, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy District pending the disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP rep., GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I I ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.1Ol6 OF 2O2O This Writ Petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3.d respondent in seeking to demolish /dispossess the petitioners' thatched huts in plot Nos.38, 25, 39, 62, Ol, situated in Sy.No.48/A1 at Kollur Village, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy District, as illegal arbitrary, and in violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 2l and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' possession over the said house plots.

2. Sri P. Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are beneficiaries of house site allotments by virtue of proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide No.F/2882/2OO8, dated ?-6.07.2OO8. He states that the Vice-President of the Mandal Praja Parishad, Jharasangam Mandal, submitted a list of beneficiaries, requesting issuance of house site patta certificates in respect -" I I I I I i I I Page 2 of5 of land in Sy.No.4S/Al, measuring Ac.4.l2 guntas, situated at Kollur Village. Smt. D. Manemma, the pattadar, gave her consent on 24.O1.2OO8 to provide her patta land for house site purposes under the LPS Scheme. Subsequently, the Mandal Revenue Inspector, Jharasangam, submitted Report No.MRI/69/ 2008, dated 03.0 I .2008. The Revenue Divisional Oflicer, Sangareddy, through Letter No.B3/358/20O8, dated

25.03.2OOa, informed that the land had been acquired under the LPS Scheme and instructed the 3rd respondent to take further action. Based on these directions, the 3rd respondent issued proceedings No.Fl2882l2OO7, dated 26.07.2008, allotting house sites to 32 individuals. The name of the lst petitioner appears at Scrial No. 12, the 2nd petitioner at Serial No.6, the 3.d pctitioner at Serial No.20, the 4th petitioner at Serial No.9, and the Srt, petitioner at Serial No. 10. Despite the allotment of house sites and issuance of necessarSr pattas in respect of land in Sy.No.48/A1, Kollur Village, Jharasangam Mandal, the petitioners have not been put in physical possession. Therefore, the petitioners seek appropriate directions to the 3.1 respondent to hand over possession of the allotted land. \ f-r Page 3 of5

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing t'lle learned Government Pleader for Revenue, produced written instructions from the 3.a respondent and submits that an attempt was made by unknown persons to encroach upon the subject land. Upon receipt of such information, the

3.d respondent, with the assistance of the police, prevented the erection of temporary huts and tin sheds by ttre said unknown persons on the subject land. He further submits that the 3.d respondent will conduct a survey of the subject land and upon verilication shall hand over the plots to the eligible beneficiaries as per the list approved by the then Tahsildar, vide proceedings No.?/2882/2OO7, dated

26.O7.2008 and secks to pass appropriate orders.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the learrred Government Pleader for Revenue, and upon perusal of the material placed on record, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 3'a respondent to adopt the procedure established by law and take necessary action, if the situation so warrants. Until such action is taken, the 3.a respondent is directed not to take any coercive steps against II l , I Page { of 5 () the petitioners, if they are found to be in possession of the plots allotted in their favour.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// sD/- I RINIVASA REDOY T REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To, '1. The Principal Secretary, (Revenue Department), Secretariat, Telangana State Hyderabad, T.S. \

2. The District Callector, Sangareddy District. 3. The Tahasildar, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy District. 4. One CC to SRI P.LAKSHMA REDDY, Advocate. [OPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. touTl

6. Two CD Copies. BSK BSR Br1 i HIGH COURT DATED:081091202s THE.q t o '\,.+ \* \ 1 3 tr , 2026 ntSt ;,17..!rfl i .ii ORDER WP.No.1016 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS c'lr, $/6v-