The High Court · 2025

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peiition, the I igh corrt .nry pleased to grant stay of further proceedings in o.s No. r "ot zor+ inctuorng conducting trial on the file of the court of V Additional Distric .ludge rarimnaiar pending disposal of revision and be pleased to pass such c 1 rer o-rder or ord6rs as this Hon ble court may deem fit and proper in the circums.; rrces of the case CRP No.13500F 2020 Petition under Articre 227 0f the constitution of rndia,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds f,eo rrerein,irre High court may be preased to allow the Revision pitrtlot oy^ setting isioe'iie oroer dated 13t08t2020, passed in r A No 21 0F 202.0 in oS No si or iili, on the fire of v Addr. District Judge at Karimnagar and to pass sucn othei order or orders as this Hon,bre Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstrn"". ot the case. Between: 1 z 1 4 5 6 7 o o Nalamasu Latha. Wo Shiyap.rss66. Aged about 30 years. Occupation House hord. R/o. Ransampet, r,llo tnoppijaili ru;;i*s:r districr. Erukalla Sudarshanam. S/o. Mallaiah, Aged. About 49 years, Occ. Employee R/o or' N;''ilIs'ie, "Tir}.."asa,.. codar;iikilil ft'r.,i]133:?i,rcolrertes' Vollala Shekharaiah. S/o Rajaiah Aged. About 4g years_. Occ. Employee at singareni Qr. No.T2_37l8. tnctine c;to;i: c;;;r;k1;;, narrmnasar distrtct. oruganti satvanaravana Reddy. S/o Neera Reddy aqed about 4g years, occ. Emptoye6 nro xiiiapair, v7; t;ffi ;d1rr,;d, mandat. Karimnasar t,Jlfl:["", Kalakuntla Ravinder Rao .S/9;. Rama. Rao, Aged 45 years, occ. Singareni R/o Eradapaili riitrd; s;;;"ri"?r,p?"# mandar, Karimnasar s,:liLlr"" Dasari Odaiah. S/ o. Flaiah, Aged.-About 54 years, Occ. Employee Sinoareni rr,ta r"a-r,i'.i.rir,ii ?i,l#} Ka rim na sa r dlstricr C olleries, R/o. Konda oa tr ir rri Presentty e.No. 1400 Jawahar Nrrgri Ramagundam, Mandal, Karimnagar Dist Dasari Balaiah, S/o. Raiaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ..singareni Employee, I a k a I a M 6 n a k o n d"u r m n o} i ji# ni g"ai' o r s t n ct. R/o. K o n d a pa Vemula Mallesham. S/o Rama.hnggm. Aged about 48 years. Occ. Sinoareni employee, R/o etr No r2-6+3,'iiirr,'"XJJ,"b#J,lriG"i "*}iltlH; Mandal Karimnagar district. Kanaparthy Rama Rao. .S/o. Rajeshwar Rao. Aged about 59 years, Occ. -virlrg" Mr rivoi-ri ur Mandat, Karimnasar .S,t;1fl:[""' Emptoyee, Rlo. nnnarain -G;oJrlll"r<nrni, -

10. Vodanala Anandam, S/o. Laxmipuram Vilage Ramadug, MJ"trl RIi,rilgllii.tr.i.t .Rama_iah. Aged. 50 years, Occ Business, R/o ...PETtTtoNER(S) AND

1. Safdar Mirza, S/o. Mirza LiaqatAli, Aged about 53 year , Occ. Legal Practitioner R/o H.No. 11-6-666/4 Red Hills, Hydeiabir I Rep. by-GpA hotder l) Shaik Abdul Khadar Javeed S/o. S.P Hussain Aged a rr:ut 39 years, Occ Business R/o. H.No. 6-3444, Khanpura, Karimnagar I Khaja Yousufuddin S/o Raheemuddin Age. 35 years, Occ. Business R/o r-.No 6-a-etq, Khanpura, Karimnagar

2. Sardar Avtar Singh, S/o. Late Sardar lnder Singh Age a rout 52 years. Occ Business. 3 Sardar Sajjan Singh, S/o. Late Sardar lnder Singh Age , bout 4g years, Occ Business.

4. Sardar Khulwant Singh, S/o. Late Sardar lnder Singh I r e about. 43 years, Occ. Business.

5. iardar Charanpal Sng!, _S1o !a!e Sardar lnder Singh r 3e about. 34 years, Occ. Business All R/o. H.No. 2-6-99, Sikhwadi, Karimri Iar

6. Mohd.Musthaqu Hussain, S/o Saheb Hussain Age abo L B0 years, Occ. Business. R/o H,No.4-5-266, Ashok Nagar, Karimnaga Z Vgl',.0 Liaqat Ali, S/o. Abdul Rahaman Age about. B0 yei r,s, Occ. Business. R/o.Sawaran Street, Karimnagar. (R-3 to R-7 are not nr: :essary parties to thrs Petition) tA No: 2 oF 2o2o "'RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that I the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the, lligh Court may be pleased to grant stay of further proceedings in O.S No ! 1 of 2014 including conduction trial on the file of the Court of V Additional Distri ;t Judge Karimnagar pending disposal of revision and be pleased to pass such r trer order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circums ances of the case lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that ir the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the - igh Court may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy of the Decree )assed in l.A.No.21 OF 2020 in O.S.NO. 54 of 2014, Order dated 13tOBt2O2O ( 1 the fite of V Addt Districl Judge at Karimnagar, and pass such other order or r> ders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the c: ;e Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. A KESHAVA REDDY (Nrl APPEARENCE) Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. MOHD |MTIAZ UDDIN Sttrt tteUE (NO APPEARENCE) Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.I85 of 2O2l and 135O of2O2O COMMON ORDER:- When the matter was listed on 13.1O.2025 and

17.ro.2025, none appeared for the revision petitioners and accordingly, the matter was posted on 29 .IO .2025 under the caption 'for dismissal'. On 29.1O.2025, Sri Mohd Abdul Kareem, learned counsel representing Sri Mohd Imtiaz Uddin Siddique, Iearned counsel for the revision petitioner in C.R.P.No. 1350 of 2O2O, reported that they intend to come on record in place of Sri A.Keshava Reddy, in C.R.P.No.185 of 2O2l and seeks time. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed todav under the caption Tor dismissal'.

2. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioners in the morning session. Therefore, the matter is passed over to a-fternoon session. However, even rn the alternoon session also there is no representation on behalf o[ the revision petitioners, despite the matter being listed under rhe caption 'For Dismissal'

3. It seems that the revision petitioners are not evincing any interest to prosecute the case. 2

4. Therefore, these two Civil Revision Petitions are - dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be r,r order as to Miscellaneous petitions, if anv are pendi.- r, shall stand clo sed. To, SD/- AHItJll :D ABDULLA KHAN ASSI }TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// , |= SECTION OFFICER '1 . The V Additional District Judge Karimnagar, Karimnagar 'lagar District 2 One CC to SRI A KESHAVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI TMOHD IMTIAZ UDDIN SIDDIQUE Adv: ;ate [OPUC] , -4. Two CD Copies )W PK/PSI- HIGH COURT ll,l ( t,'i, -o, o(J t 2 t] ':q 2026 * Sr,. r DATED:0611112025 CRP.No.185 of 2021 & CRP. NO.1350 of 2020 DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION A U4$ 1/