Vaddepalli Sheela, Wo v. Vigne-shwar,. Aged about

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kushaiguda, Malkajgiri Zone 4. The Station House Officer, Keesara Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri' 5. The Sub-lnspector of Police, Keesara Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri tV1.V. Ranoa Rao, S/o Late Sri Venkateshwara Rao, Aged about 6.6ye AoiicriturE. nyoFiatNo.501 , Sagacity Laxmi Residency, VUayapuri Co S6uth Lalaguda, Secunderabad-50001 7. 6 ars, Occ. lony,

7. M.V. Nirmala, Wo Late M.V. Appa Rao, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No 12-13-865i1 , MaruthiNagar, Tamdka, Secunderabad- 500017.

8. M.V. Hanumantha Rao, S/o Late M.V. Appa Rao, Aged about 75 years, Occ.Business, Fl/o H.No.12-13-667122, Street No.1, Kimtee Colony, Tarnaka, Secunderabad- 500017.

9. M.V. Chennakeswara Rao, Sio M.V. Venkateswara Rao. Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o Flat.No.501, Sagacity Laxmi Residency, Vijayapuri Colony, South Lalaguda, Secunderabad- 500017.

10.M: Sulochana, W/o Late Sivaramakrishna Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, F/o l-{.No. 1 2-1 3-865/1, Maruthi Nagar, Tarnaka, Secunderabad- 500017

11.Mora Susheela, W/o Late M. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Housewife, Ri,to H.No.1-7-229, Kamala Nagar, ECIL X Road, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad. ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 to 5 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondents No.6 to 11 in respect of Plot No.11 Northern Part admeasuring 500 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.11 Southem Part and Plot No.12 part, admeasuring 150 sq. yards out of 300 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.12 Southern Part admeasuring 200 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.11] Northern Part admeasuring 160 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.13 Southern Part admeasuring 24O sq. yards in Sy.No.344, situated at Nagaram Village and Grampanchayath, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, insisting the petitioners to settle the dispute with the unofficial respondents, calling the petitioners regularly to the police station and regularly interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of lhe Constitution of lndia and consequently direct respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 to 11 and not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioners from Plot No.11 Northern Part .admeasuring 500 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.11 Southern Part and Plot No.12 part, admeasuring 150 sq. yards out of 300 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, PIot No.12 Southem Part admeasuring 200 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.13 Northem Part admeasuring 160 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.13 Southern Part admeasuring 240 sq. yards in Sy.No.344, situated at Nagaram Village and Grampanchayath, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, without following due process of law ,,/ IAN o i 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the oetitioners and respondent NoS.6 to 11 and not to interfere and not to dispossess [he petitioners from Plot No.11 Northern Part admeasuring 500 sq yards in Sy.t{o.344, Plot No.11 Southern Part and Plot No.12.part, admeasuring 150 sq' vards out of 300 sq. yards in sy.No.344, Ptot No.'|2 southern Part admeasuring iOO.q. yards in Sy.No.344, Plot No.13 Northern Part admeasuring 160 sq lards in Sy.No.a++, PIot No.13 Southern Part admeasuring 240 sq. yards in Sy No'344' iitrut"O at Nagaram Village and Grampanchayath, Keesara Mandal. Medchal- Malkajgiri District. without following due process of law, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH RAVINDER Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 10: SRI GANDHAM DURGA BOSE The Court made the following: ORDER I I I --- .\ THE H()N'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR l[nt_r PerItIOtt tto.g37 O ORDER: . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behatf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5, Sri Gandham Durga Bose, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 to 10 and perused the record.

2. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are interfering in civil dispute at the behest of unofficial respondents and pressurizing the petitioners to settle the civil dispute existing between the petitioners and the unoflicial respondents in favour of the unofficial respondents, which action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 it is contended is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

3. Per contra, learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 5 while denying the writ averments -would contend that both the petitioners and the unofficial respondents have approached the respondent authorities on OS -O1.2O25 with regard to the land dispute and the respondent authorities on noticing that the aforesaid dispute being civil in nature advised the parties to approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction.

4. Learned Government Pleader would further submit that the respondent authorities except advising the parties to approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction are not interfering in the civil dispute that may exist between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents nor coercing the petitioners to settle the dispute.

5. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 is taken on record.

6. l,earned Counsel appearing on behalf of the unofhcial respondents appearing through online, on the other hand would submit that the said unoflicial respondents never approached the respondent authorities at arry time after the petitioners approaching the competent Court of civil jurisdiction by frling O.S. No.66 of 2024 wherein there is an order of injunclion granted in favour of the petitioners herein.

7. Since, both the petitioners and the unofficial respondents claim to have approached the respondent authorities on O5.01.2025 in relation to the aforesaid land and the respondent authorities having noticed the said dispute to be civil in nature I I ,L -) having advised the petitioners as well as the unofficial respondents to approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction, and the petitioners having already approached the civil Court, this Court is of the view that the respondent . authorities are to be directed not to interfere in the civil dispute that may exist which is the subject matter of O.S. No.66 of 2024. 8. Subject to the above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SIECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Departm"nt, S""r"H"t Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissroner, Rachakonda police Commissionerate, 3si#I:i:liBx;iT,5s:,,!ig#3llE[itffl ,;ii#riri],sni,.r.r"s",.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of police, Kushaiguda, Malkajgiri Zone 4. The Station House Officer, Keesara police Station, Medchal_Malkajgiri. 5' The Sub-rnspector of porice, Keesara porice station, Medchar-Markajgiri. 6. One CC to SRt. CH RAVTNDER Advocate tOpUCl 7. One CC to SRt GANDHAM DURGA BOSE Advocate [OpUC] 8. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME , High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTJ 9. Two CD Cooies KKSBs6 HIGH COURT DATED:1710412025 ORDER WP.No.937 ot 2025 y.E Slh I c x {; 1r -\ ? 5 APrl 2[25 ( \ \ ;I * Egor:-rr;\-\ 7 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETTTION WTHOUT COSTS ro},rd-ffi*