T. Doulu v. Responclents
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151; r. 11
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In r,iew of thc said submission and in vicu, of thc reasoning given in the saicl CRPs, thc prescnt (.ir-il ltcr isiorr l)ctitiorr is allowed setting aside the order datcd 29.11.2023 passccl in I.,\.No.334 of 2022 in E.O.P.No.) of 2022 bv thc lcatnccl l)rirrci…
Judgment
Petition under Section 151 of CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Eop No.09 of 2o22- on the file oi the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jogulamba Gadwal District. Counsel lor the Petitioner: SRI CH RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: _ _ _ _ The Court made the following: ORDER / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT FIYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA Civil Revision Petition. No.l0l of 2024 11,h Decemberr 2025 ' Between: T. Doulu (.hanclrzr Shcliar ancl 6 orhcrs AND Petitioner Responclents QRDER: I [card N.{r. (,h. [{:r'i.cle r, learned counsel for the petitioner. 'I'his C-ivil lto'isiorr l)cdrion is preferred aggrieved by the orcler 2' datcd 29.r1.2023 passcd irr [.-\.Nc).334 of 2022 in E.o.p.No.9 of 2022 b)' th. lcrrnrcd Prircipal l)istrict and Sessions Judge, Jogulamba Gadwal, rvlrcrcitr a ;rctition filccl rrndcr ()rclcr VII Rule 11 of CpC to reject rhe lllccd<;rr Pctition rvas disruisscd. ) ) \ { 2
S:milar petitions were filed beforc this (,ourt i.e., c.R.p.Nos.456, 457, 461, 468, and 481 of 2024 and this Court uide orders dated
04.04.2025 has allowed the said CRPs setting aside the orders passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions.f udge, Joglulamba Gaclwal and the said r>rders have artaincd finaliw.
Le:rrned counscl appearing [<rr thc pctitioncr submits that the issue involved in the prescnt revision pcrition is scluarcl], covcred by the said orders dated 04.04.2025 and that rhc sarnc ordcr may be passed in th.c present case also.
In r,iew of thc said submission and in vicu, of thc reasoning given in the saicl CRPs, thc prescnt (.ir-il ltcr isiorr l)ctitiorr is allowed setting aside the order datcd 29.11.2023 passccl in I.,\.No.334 of 2022 in E.O.P.No.) of 2022 bv thc lcatnccl l)rirrci; ral l)istr:ict arrd Scssions Judge, Jogulamba Gadwal. No costs. Miscr:llaneous Petitions, i[ anl, perrdinr irr this pctition, shall stand closed. Sd/. L. LAKSHMI BABU DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To,
The Print:ipal District and Sessions Judge, Jogulamba Gadwal.
One CC l.o Sri Ch Ravinder, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CD {}opies ABK /?R *,,s -r7 HIGH COUR,T DATED: 11/122025 ORDER CRP.No.10t ol2024 ALLOWNG"]THE CRP WTHOUT COSTS ,1't h,". s;. 2 7 Jr}l 20u6 t t ?,ic
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.