The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of J ud icatu re at Hyderabad.

2. Smt Anlani Reddy Ghadiam, Wo Venkata Pavan Kumar Avula Aged about 38 year-s, Occ. Private Employee at the USA Permanent R/o H No.5-93, Mytiinagar, Mryapur, Serilingampally(M), Ranga Reddy (District) ...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the above petitioners in C.C. No. 1 185 of 2023, On the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Vlll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally for the offenses U/sec 49B-A of IPC, 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that I the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitio: ihe High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in C.C. No. '1 185 of 2023, On the file of Princr: rl Junror Crvil Judge Cum Vll Addl. IVletropolitan l\ilagistrate, Cyberabad rt,,rL2'1 ally l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: Smt AnjaniReddy Ghadiam, D/o Ghadiam Bramhanar r a Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ Private Employee, Permanent R/o l- .No.593, I\,4ytrinagar, lt4iyapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERYDEFIT, )TO COMPLAINANT AND 1 2 J Avula Hanuma, Wo Anantha Ramulu, aged about (il years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. Flat No. 206, Manbhom Rapisody, Apa lments, Gachibowli, Hyderabad Avula Anantha Ramulu, S/o Late Avula Narayana, agerl about 75 years, Occ. Retired employee, R/o. Flat No- 206. Manbhom F.i pisody, Apartments. Gachibowli. Hyderabad Avula Srujana Chamundeshwari, D/o Avula Anantha Re rulu, aged about 42 years, Occ. ^Pvt Emoloyee. R/o. Flat no. 206, llanbhom Rapisody, Apartments, Gachibowli Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Nos. 1 to 3/l\ )CUSED Nos. 2 to 4 4 The State of Telangana, Through its P.S. Miyapur, Hyc:rabad Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT t,l r. 4/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that i the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminal petition he High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/De-facto complainant and Respondents/Accused Nos.2 to 4 and to compromise the rratter pending vide CC No 1185 of 2023 pending on the file of the Vlil Addj. .rdicial Magistrate of the First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally ,,!t!!tr l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in CC No 1 185 of 2023 pending on the file of the Vlll Addl. Judicial Magrstrate of the First Class. Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the tr,4emorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Enuganti Sudhanshu Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of [\/is Trisha Batt, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRI[,] :VI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.419 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Crrminal Petition is filed by the petitrc r ers/accused Nos 2 to 4 to quash the proceedings against them in ).C.No.1185 of 2023 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil .lrr ige-cum-Vlll Additional Metropolitan lv'lagistrate, Cyberabad ;r Kukatpally registered for the offences punishable under Sectior r 49BA of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appe.r ng for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that dur r g pendency 1 t of the present Crimrnal Petition, the parties have - tmpromised \ I the matter and accordingly, lA Nos.'l and 2 of 2C2l have been filed to record the compromise between them and t I compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 28j02025, this Court , irected the parties along with their respective counsel to appet before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, l- i yh Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identificrl ion and to submit a report

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued L r this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Higt. )ourt Legal 2 Services Committee, has identrfied the parties and submitted a report, dated 31.10.2025 and the same is placed on record

5. ln view of the above, l.A Nos 1 and 2 ol 2O2S are allowed Consequently. this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 4 in C.C.No.1 185 of 2023 on the file of learned principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Vlll Additional Metropolitan l\rlagistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, are hereby quashed lrliscellaneous applications. if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSJSTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Princrpal Junior Crvil Judge-Cum-Vlll Additional Metropolitan l\4agistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally 2 The Vlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally at Kukatpally, Cyberabad.

3. The Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.[OUT]

5. One CC to Sri Enugantr Sudhanshu Rao Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to M/s. Trisha Batta, Advocate IOPUC] 7. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo) VH/PSL $) HIGH COURT DATED:1 011112025 COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 1 AND 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.419 of 2024 i i i;; j't6 n .\ .\ \- ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION 1o Nl I-\ IOR;\NDUNI OF CIRIN'IIN.\L PETITION (Undcr Clause 528 ofB N S S ) IN THE IION'BLl: I{IGH ClOtiR'l'l:OR ]-HE STAI'E OIr TELANG.\N^ .\T: H\ Dl,llt.,\BAD IA No o12025 IN Crl. P No ll9 of 202-l Behueett:

1. Avula llarrunur. \\','o. Alanth;r lianrrrlu. Aged about (r5 r ears- Occ. I Iouse \Vit-e , R'o Flat No. 206, Manhhom llapisod1, Apartrncnts. (iachibou Ii. Hyderabad.

2. Avula Anarrthu l{anlLlu. S.,'o Latc Aurla Naravaua, Aged about 7,r rcars. Occ. Ilctd [:nrplo-r.cc. I{,1o. Flat No. 206, Malbhout I{apisod1, Apartn}ents. (iachrbou li. Hydcrabad

3. Al.ula SruSarra ( [ramuudeshrl'ali. I),'o. Ar ula ,fuiantha I{anrultr. Aged about 42 r'cars, (Jcc. Pr.'t [:rnployce, Ri'o Flat no 206, Manbhonr [(apisody Apar lrrte uts, (iachibori li, I ll,delabacl. I)ctitionersi Acr:used Nos 2 to 4 .\\ l) L The State ol'l olangana. Tl'rrough its I'.S. Mi1,apur, Hyderabad Represented by thc PLrblrc l)roscoutor, High Court at Hyderabad Respotdcnl No, 1/Cornplainant

2. Srnt Aljani Reddy Ghadiarn, Dio Ghadram Bratnhananda Reddy, Aged about 40 r'ears Occ Pvt. i:mplo1,ee, Peruaneut R/o H No 593, Mytrinagar Mi1'apur, Serilngantpally, Ranga I{eddy District. Respondent No. 2/l)e facto Cornplainant s3,o'*)ff q\*\ )< :l .IOIN'I'\II]IIO l. It is subniittctl tha1. thc Petitioncls/ Accuscd Nos o.l hcrcrrr hl cd tl above Quaslr I)etition seel<ing lo rlLrash tho pltr,; t:rlirr.us agairst the Petitionersi r\ccusecl Nos 2 to I iu (' C' No 11ti5 r,' li)21, |cntlinu on 1he Ille of llre I.Ll VIII Acicll Jrrdicrll \laqistratc ol ti ,. Irirst (.la:s. Ilan,'a Reddl Distrrct irt Kuhatpallr

2. It is suburittctl that, the I)etitiorrersi z\ccused I'J.'r to 4 antl the Respondcnt No 2/ de facto Conrplairrarrt harrc dcctrt.ll lo uruicabl_r settle thc issues bctll-er thern, rnore particular-ll tlie sub r ( cit\e of tJrrs QLrash Pctition It is sLrbrnittcd thal. as srrch. rlrc de-tltct, . ornpluinliut rs rrot havittg artv otrjection to quash tlre procccditrgs it! I n)il llrc l)etrtritncrsi Accused Nos 2 to ,1 in Cl.C. No I liii ol'202i llen( r rq orr the lile of the I-d Vlll Addl .ltrdicral Magistralc ol'tlre First Clasr i rrrr.rr Iictltlr Distr.ict at KLrkatpallr.

3. It rs subnrittcrl that. thereattcr, tlrc clisprries betr,,, err tlre: [)ctrtiouers,i 'uctrt ('ornplainant Accuscd Nos 2 1o 4 and the l(cspourlcut No ]/rl ' I heleitt rvcre anricabll, settlcd and lhat tlte I)ctitioncr'.. \ccrrscrl Nos. I to,1 and the l{espundent No 2/ dc-facto Conrplarnan, I it\ c cutcrc(l lrlto i] cornprom ise.

4. It is thelelorc subniitted that. lravins regard to ll : irlrovc 1acts. thc Petrtioners/ Accused Nos. 2 to 4 seek pcnnission ol tl i: llon'ble Cour-t to cotnpound the offelces against the Petitionersr' Acc rr t.rl Nos. 2 to 4 u/s. 498-4 I P.C and 3 and 4 of the D P Act. peuding ,r r the lllc of rhe Ld Vlll Addl. Judicial Magistrate olthe Frrst Class, Rarr rr Ilcddl, I)istrict at K ukalpally. " , ,lt,[r ry7 , the content nlclltioned il tlre satd Cornprornise Petitiol is true and rrect to the bcst ol- the l.rrrrri,ledgc and belief of thc Parlres. Ihat,thesaid cotnprolnise is eutercd rvitlr liee u ill and cotlsenl ancl n,ithout aul, undue influenoe frorn anyone. IIcrrce, thc Parlies arc lilitrg the prcsent loutt Aftidar it Llence, lhis -joiut Mcrno @ Corurscl firr I( e sponclcnt No 2 W,*W< l/x'u I(csponclent No. 2 Place l{yderabad ,1 Date. a-> 1-o2-; -J*rl Counscl lor llr e l)ctitioners A il*a, Petitioner/ A-2 Petitiouer/ A-3 Petitioner/ A-4