✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Polasa Satyanarayana v. G. Jalender & Anr.

Criminal Petition No. 8775 of 2009P SWAROOP REDDY

Case at a glance

Bench
P SWAROOP REDDY

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J October 28, 2009. NOTE: Dispatch the order by tomorrow. (B/O) PV

Judgment

Cause title

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8775 OF 2009 Between: Polasa Satyanarayana, S/o. Buchaiah …… Petitioner

AND G. Jalender & another .....Respondents

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8775 OF 2009

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner Polasa Satyanarayana – accused seeking for a direction to the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jagtial to receive the interlocutory petitions i.e. for (i) summoning7 the petition mentioned witness as a Court witness to give evidence and specimen handwritings for comparison, and (ii) appointment of Advocate- Commissioner to record the evidence of the petition mentioned witness i.e. handwriting expert in C.C. No.56 of 2008 (Old C.C. No.117 of 2000).

2.

Heard.

3.

Grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Magistrate is not receiving the applications filed by the petitioner (i) for summoning a witness as a Court witness to give evidence and specimen handwritings for comparison and (ii) for appointment of an Advocate- Commissioner to record the evidence of the handwriting expert.

4.

C.C. is of 2000, though it is renumbered in 2008.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the learned Magistrate shall receive the above referred petitions filed by the petitioner, if they are otherwise in order, and dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.

6.

With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J October 28, 2009. NOTE: Dispatch the order by tomorrow. (B/O) PV

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 8775 of 2009). ← Search more judgments