Dr.S.Surappadu v. The Andhra University
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 226
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO: 10862 of 2001 Between: Dr.S.Surappadu, S/o Late Lakshnunnaidu, R/o 5/39, Andhra University Quarters, Sriripuram, Visakhapatnam-3. ..... PETITIONER AND
The Andhra University, Rep by its Registrar, Waltair, Visakhapatnam.
Smt. K. Sitalaxmi, Associate Professor, Department of Hindi, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530 003. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the proceedings in No. S.II(4)/Lien/2000-2001 dt:
24.5.2001 of the Registrar, Andhra University, Waltair as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and are issud without application of mind and proper appreciation of the explanation submitted by the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M. SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. T. RAJENDRA PRASAD The Court made the following //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Registrar, The Andhra University, Waltair, Visakhapatnam. 2. Smt. K. Sitalaxmi, Associate Professor, Department of Hindi, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530 003.
One CC to MR. M.SURENDER RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to MR. T.RAJENDRA PRASAD, SC, High Court of A.P. Hyd. [OUT]
Two CD Copies.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.