✦ High Court of India · 13 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,266 words

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of lt,4andamus declaring the notice bearing No.G'1/CT/E- 840534/IVBNR12020, dl- 01-12-2020, of the 2nd respondent refusing to grant permission in respect of Telecommunication lnfrastructure Tower erected at building bearing H.No.7-5-150/D over Plot No.16 in Sy.No.259, situated at Lakshmi Nagar Colony, lt4ahabubnagar Telangana, though the petitioner had submitted Ell the documents as required as per G.O.lr/s.No.96, dated- 05.08,2015, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to grant the permission by considering the application dated- 19/08/2020 of the petitioner. .,,P lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition und-.r Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r,lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co. ri may be pleased to direct the 2nd res,pondent not to take any coercive ste[r!r, pursuant to notice bearing No.G1/CT/E-840534/MBNR/2020, dl: 01-12-2020 pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition und(]r Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r:;umstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to reconsider the applicatio' dated: 19.O8.2020, pending disposal o'the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSI\RI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN IJRBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMlrR, SC FOR MC W.P.No.900 OF 20111 Between: lV1/s. ATC Te ecom lnfrastructure Private Limited, lV Flc r,r Gowra Plaza, Door No. 1-8-304-30713811444, SP Road, Begumpet, SecLr ierabad, Telangana- 500003 Rep, by its Circle Legal Support, AND 1 2 The State of Ielangana, Represented by its Principal S:r:;retary lt/unicipal Administratior and Urban Development Department, Se cretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, l.elangana The Mahabubnagar l\,4 un icipa lity, Rep. by its Commissic ner, [/lahabubnagar District, Telangana. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition undor Article 226 of the Constitution of lnd ir praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the -'ligh Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direc.i rn particularly one in the nature of Wri' of l\,4andamus declaring the notice t.:aring No.G1/CT/E- 840542/lVBNRl202O, dl, 0111212020, of the 2nd responC,)"rt refusing to grant permission in respect of Telecommunication lnfrastructure Tower erected at building bearing H.No.6-3-7iA, situated at Hanumanpura, Ivlahabubnagar, Telangana, though the petitioner had submitted all the documents as required as per G.O.Ms.No.96, dated. 05.08.2015, as arbitrary , illegal, u nco nstitutio na I and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to grant the permission by considering the application dated. 12.O8.2020 of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to drrect the 2nd respondent not to take any coercive steps, pursuant to notice bearing No.G1/CT/E-340542/MBNR/2020, dl. 0111212020, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to drrect the 2nd respondent to reconsider the application dated. 12.08.2020, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMAR, SG FOR MC W.P.No.960 OF 2021 Between IV/s. ATC Telecom lnfrastructure Private Limited, lV Floor, Gowra Plaza, Door No. 1-8-304-30713811444, SP Road, Begumpet, Secunderabad, Telangana- 500003 Rep. by its Circle Legal Support, Petitioner AND 1 The State of Telangana, And Another, Represented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...PETITIONER ", ,:!L 2 The Mahabubnagar l\,4unicipality, Rep. by its Commissir rer, tVahabubnagar District, Tela nga ia ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rnc ,r praying that in the circumstances stared in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue atrrpropriate writ or any other order or dire.t ln parlicularly one in the nature of Wr t of l\,4andamus declaring the notice k,earing No.G j/CTiE_ 84217112020. dt.0111212020, of the 2nd respondent refusrn: to grant permission in respect of relec:mmu n ication lnfrastructure Tower erecterj at building bearing H.No.1-B-10714, si.uated at T.D.Gutta, Mahabubnagar, T,) engana, though the petitioner had subnitted all the documents as required es. per G.o.tvs.No.96, dated. 05i08i2015 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional end in violation of principles of naturaljustice and consequenfly direct the 2nJ respondent to grant the permission by considering the application dated. i2lo8i2c.2o of the petitioner. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the cirr.umstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High courl may be pleased to direct the 2nd respcndent to reconsider the application dalec. i2|OB,,202O. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under' Section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may L)e pleased to direct the 2nd resFondent not to take any coercive step:. 3ursuant to notice bea ring No. G 1 /CT/E - 842 i 7 1 /tV BNR t2O2O, dt. O 1 I 1 2t 2020. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSA il Counsel for the Res.pondent No.1 : Gp FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI N.pRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MC The Court made the fotlowing: COMMON ORDER w HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.897 900 AND 960 0F 2021 COMMON ORDER: Consequent upon the separate court slips moved on

12.08.2025 vlde USR.Nos.829O7, 82910 and 82912 ot 2025, respectively, by the learned counsel for the petitioner, when these matters are listed today under the caption 'for withdrawal', learned counsel sought permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions, and to that effect, he made an endorsement on the case bundle.

2. Permission is accorded and these writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions stand closed. SD/- A. JAYASREE SI ANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// GTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI MOHD ISLAN,IUDDIN ANSARI, Advocate lOPUCl 2. Two CCs to GP FoR |VCPL ADIMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3'oneCCtoSRlN.PRAVEENKUMAR,SCforlvlahabubnagarMunicipality. loPUCl

4. Two CD CoPies. cL asr GJP I i / ,::\r .,,,:)-:\ r\,i'\ 2rr5 iii ::.i ,:z' .. * ,,;/ HIGH COURT DATED:1310812025 J ,..-) ,.-) a i, ,, 18 OII * o 4i o.i COMMON ORDER WP.No.897, 900 & 960 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS c1&

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments