The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS pra.ylg that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand* li'C"r-oinO. ot Cr,rinrip.tition, the High Court may be oteased to ca, for tn" ,ecoliJr""trii"g il sc (POA Act 20',15) No43 of 2020 on ine file Hon'ble vll Additionl] SJtii"i s""tion Judge cum sC and STs Special court, Ranga neoay oistrici"'t"G rlls"iand quaJh the crime in sC (PoA Act' 2015) No.43 of 2O2O. l.A. NO: 1 o F 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings' including arrest of the petitioners in SC (PoAAct.2o15)No.43of2o2oonthefileHon.bleVllAdditionalDistrictSession Judge cum SC and STs Special court' Ranga Reddy District' at L B Nagar' I I I w., (li ' .: I.A. NO:2O F 2025 Between: Pothireddy pa l! Ramu gT*?v{.",ri11,"*,#lsilf "tr?""f,l:liHff AND ..., s L..r(r rezF(espond6nt/Compla inant ifl *;trii,,:dffi i,t 1 2 stated ffi w"';*,9,?ilTt"1".Jfi 531?yEt:::?'3:#i,iffi Jii[:,3'.i; ;3e,'J3l=,:iil:'s*'r*1Repbv.n"r;:;"::;1;'fffl ffi',lllu"'o' .. Respondent Petition under Section 3 5e(6) of BNSS prayin s in the Memorandum of Ground s of Criminal pet that in tht: circumstance S pleased to permit the petitioner/ 2nd respondent/ Defacto (,-,)mplainant to on, the Hiqfr Court m ay be compound the offence registered a gainst the Respondent/ Petrti,o ners/ Accused under Sections 504 lDC, 3(j)(rxs) SC ST POA Act 2015 in SC (POA Act 2015) No. 43 of 2O2O on the file of the H on'ble Vll Additional District {lessions Judge Cum SC and STs S pe,cial Special Co urt, Ranga Reddy District at L. B. Nagar I.A. NO:3OF 2025 This petition comir petrtion under .section 359(2) of BNSS orav. _, . stated in the Memorand,,, or croJris-"iiri##,lJig that. in the c:ircumstances pleased to record tnc comoio,iii";'r:,:']I"l-1 Petrtion, the Higl- court may be and quash procee-d.ings in scipcilX",,'idrul rrro +a Jzoi; ;; i1"";iuomise c u m s c,, ; s;." ; p ; ; i, 3 JJ. [i": : 1,.i", xJ: iilxffi Ll,,:l j?,:; ?,;;p A r. Grounds or ci,;;;'1":lJl' l""T''n;r#"IJ::ilhe Mernorandum or tn" ar5yuments of sri c shanthappa Advocate for the the Additionai Public Prosecutor on behall. of the Respondent No..l ,n "no "",n,onur"'"'nn d of sri chandra Bhargav, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER l I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUYVADI SRTDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.29 7 of2025 COMMON ORDER: ' This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in S.C. (POA Act, 2015) No'43 of 2020 on the file of VII Additional District and Sessions 'ludge-cum-SCs and STs Special Court, Ranga Reddy District at L'B'Nagar' registered for the oft'ences punishable uncler Sections 504 of IPC and Section 3 (1) (0 (s) of SCiS'fs Amendment Act' 2015' I I i

2.ltissubmittedbylearnedcounselappearingforthe petitioner as well as the respondent No'2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I'A Nos'2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to i compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 09'01'2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respectivc counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' I{igh Coutt 2 t ,..:. for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Ptrrsuanl to the above said direction issued b1, this Courl, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High {lourt Legal Services Ctommittee, has identified the parties and submitted a repoft, deLtr:d 22.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In vir:w, of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 o1- 2025 are allorved. (--ousequcntly, this Criminal petition is allowed and the procee,Jings against the petitioner/accused in S.C (pOA Act, 2015) No.43 of 2020 on the file of VII Additional District and Sessi,lrls .ludge-cum-SCs and STs Special Cour1, Ranga Reddy Di:;t .ict at L.B.Nagar. are hereby quashed. Misce.llaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ ION OFFICER tI J To, 1 2 a 4

5. 7 The Judicial First Class Magistrae at Parigi. The Station House Officer, Doma Police Station, Vikarabad. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Orcurt Buildings, Hyderabad Two CCs to lrublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of -felangana Hyderabad (OLJT) One CC to Sri C Shanthappa, Advocate tOpUCJ One CC to Sri Chandra Bhargav, Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copi DL/gh I , HIGH COURT DATED:31/01tZOZi i l COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 and l] of 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.297 ot Z02S -:* 1rrr. S I,r 1O ( ) o E7 t t)Sspq r Z c l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025 AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED. t k) I t.l :ll' ,tll ,,ttl '_r'a (N4emorandum of 'IN TIIE HIGH COURT AT :: F I.A.NO Between crl P No Al t:i Pothireddv Pally Ramana Slo' Bheemaiah'; Aged 45 ye'ars. bcc: Agriculture labour i R/"o.Gunrial Village oIDorna Mandal l Vikarabad District Presently R/o.4-lo- SC wada' Bompally' -..7 Doma Mandalam, Bompatle' PO: Bompallii) Vikarabad District. I ; Aid S u66 ) ,3rerE or TSIANGANA ERABAD oF 2025 2025 f PetitionerlRespondent/Complainant I Sathunuri Sailu @ Sayappa S/o Late V-eriiiataiah' Aged 32 years, Occ: unemployed/Graduate' RJ-o. Gumdal Village of Doma Mandal ' V ikarabad Dislrict.

2. State of Telangana, Rep. Public Prosecutor, For the State of Telangana, High Court, at HYderabad' Respondent/Petitioner/Accused Respondent JOINT MEMO I submit that the one the report given by the petitioner i2"d Respondent the 1. Police of P.S. Doma Registered a case in Crime No 136 of 2018 under Sections 504 IPC, 3(1)(r)(s) SC ST POA nct, ZO t S The police after investigation fi1ed charge sheet in the courl of the Hon'ble VII Additional District Session Judge cum SC and STs Special court, Ranga Reddy District, at L B Nagar' The learned judge to cognizance of offenceandnumberedthecaseasSC(PoAAct,2015)No.43ofLozo. 'l hat the Petitioner'/2nd Respondent t filed the repofl due to misunderstand ing 2. the acts of ths Petitioner as unusual and amounting to the offence Under Section 504 IPC, 3(1Xr)G) SC ST POA Act' 2015' After filing of the report the Petitioner/2"d \ H \\ '4, \! the pet it ioner,.A cc used who is graJuared ond appearing\ {o any offence falling under section 504 Ip{:, 3(1)(r)(s) SC the commrrnication gap, on lhc srrengtlr oI communily red his not to prosecute the criminal L;ase registered ts appearing for competitive examirraiions for his _-,s fanily sur.vive, as it;lay cause adverse irnpact on him \ 'a s-ubmit rhat the petitio,erl2"d Respondent is not incrined to pr(rsecute the case registeted againsr rhe petitioner and thc same may be quash il view of the developments tal<en place after filing of the report given b;. me. Tht, petitioner is innocent person hut lue to m isu.derstanding on my part fire the renorl as if the petitio,er committec rl}'ences a eged ag:inst hirn and be quashed in rhe interest of justice ad both tlrt- Jarties have no claims or rights against each other i r f,ture. In vieu, of thrt above lacts and cil.cumstances, it is therelore prryed thal this Hon'bie High corrt rirrv be pleased to qlrash the proceedings in SC (pr_r4 Act,20l5) No 43 of 2020 on tr.i': file of Hon'bre vli Additronar District Session .rrdge cum SC and STs Special cour-t, Ra,ga Reddy Distr-icL, at L.B.Nagar and pass sr-ch other order o. oLders as this Jl.n'bre court rnay deern fit and proper in the circurLstances of the Respondent/Petitir.ur:r i\ccused Counsel lbr. Respondents,?e rt1 o;re; / {ccused Defacto-Complai'urnt ( Counsel fo Petitioner,&esponC :nt/ De-lacto Complain,rnt i I I I ! I t ! .i ,i J i J ,i , + 'I t. 1 ! 1i I i