Criminal Petition No. 5857 of 2012 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Section 311 Cr.P.C. The complaint in the lower Court is one under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, the Act). It was filed in the year 2008. After completion of trial, when the case was coming up for arguments, the complainant came up with the petition. 3 documents sought to be filed as additional evidence in the Criminal Court are 1) certified copy of plaint, 2) certified copy of written statement and 3) certified copy of promissory note. They are totally irrelevant for the purpose of disposal of the criminal case under the said Act. The said suit was filed 2 years after filing of the criminal case in the lower Court as O.S.No.6 of 2010. It is evident that the petitioner’s intention is to drag on his own criminal case for obvious reasons. There are absolutely no merits as well as bona fides on the part of the petitioner. The lower Court rightly dismissed the petition refusing to permit the petitioner to invoke Section 311 Cr.P.C. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Dt. 6th August, 2012. PNV
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379; Prevention to Damage of Public Property Act, 1984 — s. 3; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 70(2), 311; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.