Nagarkurnool District, Telangana v. The District Collector, Nagarkurnool District, Nagarkurnool
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Dec 2025
- Bench
- PULLA KARTHIK
Outcome
Disposed of
this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar circumstances, this Court while disposing of w.P.No.3 9691 of 2025 on 24.t2.2O25, directed the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners thereon, in accordance with law. The learned counsel seeks…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief, more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of' lndia, declaring the actibn of the Bg_sponOents in not appointing/absorbi ng the Petitioners as Record Assistants under the jurisdiction of the Respondents in terms of G.O. Ms. No.-81, Revenue Department, dated 24-07-2023 and G.O. Ms. No.85, Finance Department, dated ---- 03-08-2023 and in pursuancg of .the-.- 1ep1e_sentation made by the Petitioners dated 06-12-2025 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide and unconstitutional violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of tndia, and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents to forthwith consider '::i- j..,: and appoint/absorb the Petitioners as Record Assistants in terms of G.O. Ms. No.8.1, Revenue Department, dated 24-07-2023 and G.o. Ms. No.gs, Finance Department, dated 03-08-2023 on par with other VRAs with effect from the date of reinstatement as VRAs vide proceedings Rc. No.A7IEVRO/000312024 dated 22-11-2025 with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary, seniority lA NO: 1 OF 2026 : Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider and appoinUabsorb the petitioners as Record Assistants in terms of G.O. Ms. No.81, Revenue Department, dated 24-07-2023 and G.O. tt/s. No.85, Finance Department, dated 03-08-2023 in their department or any other department pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. V. KRISHNAIAH Counselfor the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER n a i*,.itr -**-.... -. .. a ' ' i .. :.:4. .- :. ,it.:sJL:i: .: ..' -.i'-: .. :.',.j ir;'.;.. ''. ' , .. j. jii{.r'r.1sHr.t.i}'d!"/.}.iil..:.. . ;,'ffififEffit***: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.972 OF 20126 THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX Between: Gorla Venkataiah & (2) others The District Collector, Nagarkurnool district & and (4) orhers. AND
ORDER :
Petitioners ... Respondents with the consent of the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
This writ Petition is fited declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing/absorbing the petitioners as Record Assistants.in terms of G.o.Ms.No.81 Revenue Department dated 24.7.2023 and G.o.Ms.No.85, Finance Department dated
3.8.2023 in pursuance of representation of the petitioners dated
6.12.2025 as arbitrary and illegal. .- \ \ '\ ' ,i-litEi 'i ',-, \ 2 Heard Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents.
Operative part
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar circumstances, this Court while disposing of w.P.No.3 9691 of 2025 on 24.t2.2O25, directed the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners thereon, in accordance with law. The learned counsel seeks to pass similar order in this writ petition also- The sa-Ine is not seriously disputed by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. In view of the above, following the order passed in 4. w.P.No.3 969l of 2025 dated 24.12.2025 and in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners on 6.12.2025, and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' t , I I I I t i I I I l, I : : I l, ,j'l ,l r It 3 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. A.V.S. //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4.
7.
BM GJP HIGH COURT DATED:09/01 12026 ORDER WP.No.972 of 2026 .tHE S)'4 ? () 2 ? JAN 2026 :l * .-..- ^t..r'j I .:#i*-*i. '' '&'r'-^_' __' --' ': . r}rtdrpli*"l*." " DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS N
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 06 Dec 2025. The bench was PULLA KARTHIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.