Criminal Petition No. 12002 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Permission is accorded and, accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1802 of 2007 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, initiated for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC. Heard.
Operative part
The learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the matter for some time, has sought for permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition and prayed for dispensation of the presence of the petitioners before the trial Court and consequently order to recall the N.B.W issued against the petitioners. Permission is accorded and, accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with except the dates on which the trial court insists for their presence. Further, the petitioners are directed to file an application before the trial court to recall the Non-bailable warrants pending against them and on such filing of the application, the trial court is directed to recall the same on the same day itself. Miscellaneous Petitions filed in this Criminal Petition, if any, shall stand closed. Date:25.11.2011. Gk. _________________ RAJA ELANGO,J THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.12002 of 2011 Gk. Date: 25.11.2011.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Permission is accorded and, accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.