Criminal Petition No. 1627 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

26.04.2010. Again, petitioner filed the present petition on the same grounds and the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even after passing of the order in April 2010, there are no further proceedings before the trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised the following two grounds for consideration: i) there is delay in filing the complaint before the trial Court; ii) promissory note filed before the Court is a zerox copy and unstamped promissory note. On the above two grounds, learned counsel wants to quash the proceedings in S.T.C.No.109 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur. This Court is of the view that the said points can be raised before the trial Court and they are the materials placed before the concerned court for appreciation. Hence, this court is not inclined to interfere. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. In any event, considering the nature of allegations and the submissions made by the learned counsel, the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with except the dates on which the learned Magistrate insists for his appearance and he shall be properly represented through his counsel. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed along with the criminal petition shall stand closed. 22nd February 2011, Rns. ________________ RAJA ELANGO, J.