B. Gouthami v. B. Poolamma
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Cause title
1. B. Poolamma, W/o Anathaiah, @ Anthi Reddy 2. LIC of India, rep.by Divisonal Manager, Warangal 3. The New India Assurance Com Ltd., rep.by Divisional Manager, Karimnagar 4. The Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad 5. B. Anthi Reddy, @ Anthaiah, 6. B. Srinivasa Reddy S/o Anthi Reddy @ Anthaiah, ( Respondents 1, 5 and 6 are R/o Pagidipalli Village, Maripada Mandal, Warangal District) (Respondents 2 to 4 are not necessary) Respondents The petition coming on for orders as to admission upon perusing the memorandum of grounds filed therein and the orders of the High Court dated 03-03- 2005 & 15-03-2005 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Mr. T.S. Anand Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. M. Venkatram Reddy, Advocate for the Respondnet No. 1 and of
Mr. L. Prabhakar Reddy, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6, the Court made the following
ORDER:
“At request of the learned counsel for the respondents, Post tomorrow i.e., 29-3-2005. The interim stay granted earlier, shall continue until further orders.” // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The III Additional District Judge, at Warangal 2. B. Poolamma, W/o Anathaiah, @ Anthi Reddy , r/o Pagidipalli Village, Maripada Mandal, Warangal District)
B. Anthi Reddy @ Anthaiah, R/O Pagidipalli Village, Maripada Mandal, Warangal Distict.
B. Srinivasa Reddy S/O Anthi Redy @ Anthaiah, R/O Pagidipalli Village, Maripada Mandal, Warangal District.
One Spare Copy BV HIGH COURT RGJ DATED: 03-03-2005 NOTE: POST FOR ADMISSION AND HEARING ON 15-3-2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.