High Court · 2025

Panaganti Kirusalya, Wo Late Srinivas Reddy, aged about 77-years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No. 1-7-20, JSN Colony, Streef No.8, Habsiguda beside Legend Apartments, Uppal, Medchal Diskict, Hyderabad, TS. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad

2. The District Collector, Suryapet, Suryapet Dist. 3. The Tahsildar cum Joint Sub Registrar, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet Diskict 4. Sri Mandadi Buchi Reddy, s/o Late Venkat Reddy, aged about 67 years, Occ. Private employee, R/o H.No. 1S2,Street No.4, Venkatadri Township. Phase l. Chowdaryguda village. Ghatkesar Mandal..Medchal District. TS.

5. Basha Karla Ravinder, s/o Sataiah. aged about 48 years, Occ. Agriculture. r/o Phanagiri village, Nagaram Mandal. Suryapet Diskict, TS.

6. Basha Karla Venkateshwarlu, s/o Sataiah, aged about 45 years. Occ. Agriculture. r/o Phanagiri village, Nagaram Mandal. Suryapet District, TS. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.2 herein in not initiate any action upon my on line applications LM No.2100108786 and another LM No.2100108787 dated 31-12-2021 filed in accordance with the orders of this Honble Court vide in W.P.No. 6228 of 2020 dated 03-12-2021, for correction wrong e_ntries in the Dharani Portal and as well as connected revenue in Sy.No. 200 to an extent of agricultural land Ac.2-00 guntas out of Ac. 06-35 guntas situated at Phanagiri Village, Nagaram Mandal Suryapet Districti and issued Digital Pass Books in respect of the above s.: irl land in favour of the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 is illegal and cons€'q uently direct the respondent No.2 herein to set aside the illegal pattas rlltained by the un official respondent Nos.5 and 6 colluded with the resSrondent No.3 herein and restore the name of the petitioner herein in place of her late husband as per the registered sale deed document No.825/19i 7 dated 17 -08-1977 executed by the respondent No.4 herein in favour of 'he husband of the petitioner before the SRO Suryapet forthwith. Prayer amended as per C.O.dt.26.08.2025 in lA No.1/202 j. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the rrcurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL 1 may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 , 2, 3 to maintain Status quo :c 'finalize the online application made by the Petitioner vide LM No. 210010878r ilnd another LM No. 2100108787 dated 31 .12.2021, pending disposal of the mai', '/Vrit Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KODIPELLI SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI H.RAKESH KU i/lAR, AGP, REP. FOR GP FOR REV[:NUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S & 6: Ms. URMILA, REP. l: CIR SRI CHALAKANI VT:NKAT YADAV The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.738 OF 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wrii of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No'2, upon my online application LM No.2100108786 and another LM Nt.ZrooioSzez dated 31.12.2021 filed in accordance with the orders of this Hon'ble Court vide in w.P.No.6228 l2O2O d'ated 03.12'2021 but the Respondent No.1 not providing the land grievance logins to the Respondent No.2 to finalize the Iand gricvance matters is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principals of natural justice and against the article i4, lg, 2l &' 300 A constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to givc suitable instructions to the Respondent No.2 & 3 to hnalize the ontine application made by the Petitioner wide LM No.2100108786 and another LM No 2100108787 dated 31.12.2021 forthwith and pass such other order or orders " Amended Prayer vide Order dated 26 O8-2O25 in I A No I of 2023 is as follows:- "... declare the action of the respondent No.2 herein in not initiate any action upon my on line applications LM No'210O1O8786 and accordance *ith th. orders of this Hon'ble Court vide in W'P No' No.2100108787 dated 3l-12-2021 filed in accordance with the orders of this Hon'ble Court vide in W.P.No 6228 of 2020 dated O3-L2-2O21, for correction wrong entries in the Dharani Portal and as well as connected revenue in Sv.No.2OO to an extent of agricultural land Ac.2-00 guntas out of Ac.O6 35 guntas situated at Phanagiri Village, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet District, and issued Digital Pass Books in .."Ip""t of the above said land in lavour of the respondent Nos'5 and O is ittegal and consequently direct the respondent No 2 herein to set aside tie illegal pattas obtained by the unofhcial respondent Nos'S and 6 colluded with the respondent No.3 herein and restore the name of the petitioner herein in place of her late husband as Per the registerid sale deed document No.825/ 1977 dated 17-08-1977 exicuted by the respondent No.4 herein in favour of the husband of the petitioner before the SRO Suryapet forthwith and pass such other order or orders ..." Heard Mr.Kodipelli Sridhar, learned counsel for 2 petitioner, Mr.H.Rakesh Kumar, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearlng for respondent Nos. i to 3 and Ms.Urmila, learned 2 counsel representing Mr.Chalakani Venkat Y rrlav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6

3. When the matter is taken up for conside . ation, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitior cr.has hled an application under Dharani Portal seeking correr t jon of wrong entries in the revenue records in respect of the ap;.ic:ultural lald admeasuring Acs.2-00 guntas out of Acs.O6- tli I+tntas in Sv.No.2OO situated at Phanagiri Village, Nag ram Mandal, Suryapet District. However, pending Writ Petition, the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2024 firr short, "rhe Act") has come into place. Therefore, he seeks a rjirt:ction to the official respondents to pass appropriate orders. 4 Learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Re 'r:nue by fiiing counter affidavit also seeks a direction to the pt.:itioner to file fresh application AS per the Act and that the s rne would be considered in due course of time. 5 Respondent No.4, filed counter afficlavit bur r. one appea-rs on his behatf

6. Ms.Urmila, ie:rrned counsel representing res ,r_ nclent Nos.5 and 6 also seeks to pass appropriate orders. --,,

7. Having regard to the submissions of all the learned counsel, this Court -without going into the merits or demerits of the case is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the petitioner to hle a fresh applicatior .rs per the provisions of the Art, within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt cf - copy of the order. On liling such application, the official respondents are directed to consider the same ald pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, in accordarce with 1au', tvithout collecting any fees.

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of No costs Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, sha-Il stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Depart Hyderabad, State of Telangana. I P. PONNA KRISHNA STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER t, Secretariat Building,

2. The District Collector, Suryapet, Suryapet Dist. 3. The Tahsildar cum Joint Sub Registrar, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet District 4. One CC to SRI KODIPELLI SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI CHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FoR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR HIGH COURT EWJ DATED: 18109t2025 ORDER WP.No.738 o12022 ,;1" . t:- 'i i '' 15 [r lff, $. ,/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \o J \*