Thati Rajasekhar v. State of A.P., through Police Miryalaguda Town
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
#1. Thati Rajasekhar S/o Sri Thati Sudarshan. 2. Thati Sudarshan S/o Sri Seethaiah. 3. Smt. T. Surya Kumari W/o Thati Sudarshan. 4. Thati Maheshwar S/o Sri Thati Sudarshan. Petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 ( in Cr. No. 17 of 2007 on the file of Miryalaguda Town P.S., Nalgonda District.) AND State of A.P., through Police Miryalaguda Town rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Respondent/Complainant (Respondent in do ) COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : Sri D. Madhava Rao COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Public Prosecutor Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memo. of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/Accused in Crime No. 17 of 2007 on the file of Miryalaguda Town Police Station. (Contd. 2. ) . 2 . THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOIWNG ORDER: Sd/- K. MOHAN RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
#1. The Sessions Judge, Nalgonda. 2. The Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District, Miryalaguda.. 3. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. 4. The Station House Officer, Miryalaguda Town Police Station, Nalgonda District.
#5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT) 6. One spare copy. 7. One CC to Sri D. Madhava Rao, Advocate (OPUC) BV HIGH COURT GMJ DT. 27-6-2005
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.