Smt. Jaiala Bheemeshwari v. 1. The State of Telangana

4. Smt. Deshetty Mamatha, W/o. Raia ngQQV' aged 42 ygars, MPTC Vemulakurthi, [brahimpatnam tvlandal, Jagtial District.

5. Smt. B.Vivekavardhini, W/o. Mahesh, aged 40 years, MPTC Yamapur, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District.

6. Smt. Bashetty Radha, W/o. Ganesh, aged 38 years, MPTC Erdhandi, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District.

7. Thimmani Ramulu, S/o. Nadipi Gangaram, aged 50 years, MPTC-ll lbrahimpatnam, lbrahimpatnam (t\il), Jagtial Diskict-

8. Smt. Padala Mamatha, W/o. Raja Reddy, aged 42 years, [TIPTC-| lbrahimpatnam, lbrahimpatnam (M)' Jagtial District. 9- Ponakanti Chinna Venkati, S/o. Rajagangaram, aged 40 years, MPTC Varshakonda, lbrahimpatnam lrrlandal, Jagtial District'

10. Smt. Ivlalavath Sarojana, W/o. Sudarshan, .aged 40 years, MPTC Ammakkapet, lbrahimphtnam Mandal, Jagtial District' 'l 1 . Smt. Deshetty Shantha, W/o. Jeevan, aged 35 years, MPTC Dabba, lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Jagtial District. l2.Akkenapalli Jalesh, S/o. Gangaram, aged 43 years, MPTC Komati Kondapur, lbrahimpatnam (tvl), Jagtial District- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of Ihe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ or direction, declaring the impugned Notice No.A/39812023, Dt.3o-12-2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent/RDo purportedly in Form-v under section 263 (1) of rhe Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018 pursuant to the Representation Dt.27-1 2-2023 alleged to have submitted by the Respondents 4 to 7 herein calling for a meeting on 16- 01-2024 at 1 1 At\,4 to express no-confidence against the petitioner as president of lbrahimpatnam lrrlandal Praja Parishad, Jagtial District as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of provisions of rhe Telangana panchayat Raj Act, 201g and Articles 14 and 19 of the constitution of lndia, consequenfly set aside the impugned Notice Dt.30-12-2023. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section '151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the proposed No-confidence Motion tvleeting scheduled on 16-01-2024 at 1 l -00 AlVl to express no-confidence against the petitioner as President of lbrahimpatnam [vandal praja parishad, Jagtial District by suspending the impugned Notice No.A/3g8t2023, Dr.3o-12-2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent / RDO in Form-V. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: '1 . Smt. Vemul Deshetty Mamatha, W/o. Raja Reddy, aged akurthi, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, jagtial District.- 42 years, IVPTC

2. Smt- B.Vivekavardhini, W/o. Mahesh, aged 40 years, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District.

3. Smt-. Bashetty $ad|ra, W/o. Ganesh, aged 38 years, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District. MPTC Yamapur, MPTC Erdhandi,

4. Thimmani Ramulu, S/o. Nadipi Gangaram, aged 50 I brahimpatna m, I brahimpatnam (M1, .la gti"at District.'

5. Smt. Padala lrrlamatha, W/o. Raja Reddy, aged 42 lbrahimpatnam, lbrahimpatnam (lr/), Jagtial Olsiiict. years, MPTC-ll years, I\IPTC-l 6 Ponakanti Chinna Venkati, S/o. .Rajagangqram, aged 40 years, MpTC Varshakonda lbrahimpatnam Mandal, jigtia'i Oistrict. " 7 t' I ernr lilalavath Sarojana, W/o. Sudarshan, aged 40 years, MPTC Xmmaflap"t, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District' smr Deshetty Shantha, Wo. Jeevan, aged 35 years, MPTC Dabba' i-oiJnimpatnam Mandal, Jagtial District' Akkenaoalli Jalesh, S/o. Gangaram, aged 43 years, IVIPTC Komati Kondapur, iorJnimirrtnam (M), Jagtial District' .,,PETITIONERS AND 2

1. Smt. Jaiala Bheemeshwari, W/o- Jagan Rao,.aged 53 years, Occ' President, ilianOrf pt i, Parishad lbrahimpatnam, Jagtial District' Tha stale of Telanqana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and nririilu"roprentbepartm6nt, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad' 3. Revenue Divisional officer, Metpally Revenue Division, Jagtial District. 4 tvlandal Parishad Developmeit gfficer. lvlandal Praja Parishad - i6ili.lliiprtnam, lbrahimpatnam Vill and [t/andal, Jagtial District' ...RESPONDENTS petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted in l.A. No.1 of 2024 in W.P. No. 397 of 2024, dated O9-O1-2O24- lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Between: The State of Telangana, Rep. by- its Principal S.-ecretary, Panchayat Raj and nriuio?u"iop.entbepartmi:nt, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad' Revenue Divisional officer, Metpally Revenue Division, Jagtial District. 1 2 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 Smt. Jaiala Bheemeshwari, W/o. Jagan Rao, ag.ed 53 years, Occ' President' ilianOif prala Parishad lbrahimpatnam, Jagtial District It/andalParishadDevelopmentofficer,.|vlalda!PrajaParishad i6i"'filmpatn"m, lbrahimpatnam Vill. and Mandal, Jagtial District' ernr Deshettv Mamatha, W/o. Raja Reddy, aged 42 years, lrilPTC Vljiiirrr"'r,.,iii,i,-ibrahimpatnam Smt B.Vivekavardhini, W/o. I\Iahesh, aged 40 years, MPTC Yamapur, iorahimpatnam Mandal' Jagtial District' smr Bashetty Radha, W/o. Ganesh, aged 38 years, MPTC Erdhandi, iOranimpatnarh Mandal, Jagtial District' lvlandal, jastial Diitrict' 2 2 4 5 u [?#ffiil'#IH',.:#i:,,Hi,r,i rg??,r,?B,l];,"iged 50 years, Mprc.,, ' io2i,,i,1',fi11" %?$i$,i;,##irfU_ L"Sgf,r,r* 42 yea,s, Mprc.l v,,..r,itonoX,'iijl,'n,,XEl[#h B. Ponakanti Chinna \/e ,i',i;.5l,r"rrl,l?flAp[,"n"0 40 years, A,4prc " :il1"#:ix1:ll,,n?,ffil1ll; #i:.,,:j*:yr*,,*". 40 years, A,,prc 'o io[i,#o",Tl|Yr?lilli3;nffi;,,#3,y"",,n"0'., years, Mprc Dabba, " fli:fiH53lll#?ii: r.j3,,gffi ?,l,lli, ased 43 yea rs, M prc Koma ti Konda pu r, (Respondent Nos.2 to 11 are not necessary parties) petition under Section -r 61 .Dr. ^-_ in the affidavit rileo in su ;:i,:" ".,"*,,, o_* l::J:::; :;:;; ll",:", 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated court may o" pru,."o to t.1 of 2024 in W.p.No.397 of "RESPoNDENTS Counsel for the petitionet " Sfl iiHltbt tr.^?[1Hh X iti. o * COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdCNT NO.1 tO 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to 12: SRI K.VENUMADHAV The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI tr/RIT PETITION No. 397 oF 2024 ORDER: Sri Aluvala Kedharnath, learned counsel representing Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, lear:red counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and therefore, the writ 'petition has become infructuous. Recording the abbve said submission, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. \ \ To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI JITHENDER RAO VEERAIVAL 2. One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC] 3.TwoCCstoGPFoRPANCHAYATRAJRURALDEV,HighCourtforthe Advocate [OPUC] State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies BSR GJP w HIGH COURT DATED:1010612025 ORDER WP.No.397 of 2024 B 1HE S14; e. o e ) o 13 AUE 206 (' ( t, a) t l)F CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS