Mrs. Macchukanti Chandrakala v. The Collector, Malkajgiri
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent demolishing the portion of the boundary wall and the room and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property on the western portion of H. No. 43-253 (PTl No. 1171OO4435) admeasuring 133.33 sq yards or ',l 1 1.46 sq meters out of 266 sq yards, situated at Hanuman Nagar, Moula Ali, under Malkajgiri Municipality, Medchal Malkajgiri District, is as illegal, void, ultra virus, unconstitutional and violation of Principles of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2O2O Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the from the property on the western portion of H. No. 43-2$ Pf l No. 1 1 7'1004435) admeasuring '133.33 sq yards or 1 1 1.46 sq meters out of 266 sq yards, situated at Hanuman -7 Nagar, Moula Ali, urrder tMalkajgiri Municipality, Medchal Malkajgiri District pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice and equity.'[ending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SALEHA BEGUM Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE
WRIT PETITION NO: 372 oF 2020 Between: Mr. Chikkati Babu Rao, Slo, Chikkati Gopal Naidu, Aged 43 year, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 43-45813A, Hanuman Nagar, New Hi(fr-School, Moula Ali, Malkaigiri, Hyderabad. -Nissi AND 1 2 .7 The State of Telangana, Rep by.its principle Secretary, Revenue Department, office at Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, T.S. The Collector, Malkajgiri Mandal, Medchal Dist, O.R.R. Kesara. The Tahsildar, Office at Neredment, Malkajgiri Mandal, Medchal, Malkajgiri District. ...PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly oie in the natuie or writ of mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent dlmolishing tne 6rtion of the boundary warl and the room and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property part of survey No. 403, admeasuring 400 sq yards or 334 sq meters situated at Manuman Nagar, Moula Ali, Malkajgiri Mandal, R. R. District, T.s., bounded by on \orth. Neighbours property, South. Neighbours property, East. 25 ft wide road, and on west. Grave yard, is as ilega[ void, urira virus, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice 'cJurt lA NO: 1 OF 2020 _-Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 not. to dispossess the petitioner from the rand bearing survey No. 403 admeasuring 400 sq yards or 334.40 sq meters situated at -riio.tn. Hanuman Nagar, Moura Ari, Markajgiri, R. R. District, T.S., bounded oy on Neighbours property, South. Neighbours property, East. 25 ft wide road, anJ on west. Grave yard pending disposar of the writ petition in the interest or juitice ana equity. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SALEHA BEGUM ---------- Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER --------
7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT I,ETITION Nos.332 and,372 of 2O2O ORDER: . These petitions are coming for hearing since 2O20. On 2L.O2.2O25 when the matters were called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the matters were directed to be listed under the caption ufor Dismissal". Even today, when the matters are called. there is no representation. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
Accordingly, both the Writ petitions are clismissed for non-prosec ution / default. No order as to costs
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in these Writ Petitions shall a,lso stand closed. \ //TRUE COPYII SD/. SRIHARI DEPLITYREGISTRAR To, SEC;TION OFFICER ' II:J,.:i:[b Secretary, Revenue Department, office at Secretariat, saifabad, 2. The Coilector, Matkajgiri Mandal, Medchal Dist, O.R.R. Kesara 3. The Tahsildar, Office at Neredment, Malkajgiri Mandal, Medchal, Malkajgiri 4. One CC to SRt. SALEHA BEGUM Advocate IOPUC] u to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the State of retangana. ,'Jfr""t 6. Two CD Cooies KKS p*."-,. HIGH COURI' DATED:21 10:\12025 ,t -) J r.) €. ( t llE S14 16 2 0 Jut'l il6 ,) aLL) f)( COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.332 & 372 ot 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS f*,.C,'. A\q\"( I I
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.