Smt. M.Chandrakala v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewrth, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates in interfering and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 507, Block B, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Block -8, GoMhami Nagar, Edulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, sangareddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, i I arbitrary, violative or Articles '14, 21 and 300-4 of the C I rstitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.5 and his sub-orl nates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plol ,lo. 507, admeasuring 400 square yards, Block B, in Sy. No. '135 part, situatec rt Block B, Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally village, Ramchandrapuram lr,4anC: , Sangareddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the I cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nI y be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere vith the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 507, admeasuring 4[ ] square yards, Block B, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Block-B, GoMhami Na ;ar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram l\,4andal, Sangareddy District. vithout following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5: SMT. S. SR/\ /ANTHl, AGP FOR RE VENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL At MINtSTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMEl'\- Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA tl :DDy, SC FOR MUNICIPALIT'/ The Court made the following: ORDER w'v/ v/ /: : IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.732 ol'2022 THE 17TII DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Smt. M.Chaldrakala AND . .. Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Special Chief Secretary to Governmcnt , Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & (5) others. ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, Iearned Star-rding Counsel lor Municipalities, appearing for the respondents. Perused the materia-l on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner liled the present V,/rit Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent. No.S und thcir sub-ordinates in interfering with and demolishing the cornpolrncl wall of the petitioner in 1 2 respect of petitioner's Plot No.507, Block B, in Sy.No.135 Part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, EdulalagurL apally Village, Ramachar-rdrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy Distric, (for brevity, "the subj ect propertr'") ar-rd threatening to dispossc s ; the petitioner from her plot, rvithout issuing any notice and ', ithout following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furth: submits that, while admitting the matter, this Court passed itt , rim order dated

24.O1.2021 directing the official respondents not -o interfere u,ith the petltioner's possession over the subject propo ty. Hou'ever, in spite of lapse of more than four years, the respor dent authorities have not filed counter or vacate petition for denl,ir g the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. In ., ew of the same, learned counsel requested this Court to allow th: Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to in erfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject I roperty without following due process of law.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Go'r:rnment Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in p rssession of the subject property, the respondents will not irr erfere with the petitioner's possession over the subject property, 'zithout following 3 -l due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of 1aw. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, sha-il stand closed. SD/-S. MALLIKARJU NA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /: //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Special Chief Secretary to Govt. The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Principal Secretary to Govt.. The State of Telangana, IVA and UD Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 5. The Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District. 6. The Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Tellapur, Sangareddy District. 7. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI

9. One CC to Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, SC for MunicipalityloPucl '10.Two CC to The GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]

11.Two CD Copies TJ HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 ORDER WP.No.732 of 2022 p .\ R HE S,-I ) 0 g JAir 1t ?. .1] . .:- ':.:/ .ci,l -4 ".,, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1 lt-b