or courts Act, ie71 to v. s#;$#H:Ht$iilh}*=#ili*xm3ffi,"",s:it#""In"j?:n:"

Counsel for the petitioner :Sri M Atish Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Bharath Reddy Bommineni The Court made the following: ORDER ... Respondent MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA co TE c EN I t20 ORDER: Heard Sri M.Athish Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Bharath Reddy Bommineni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the resPondent.

2. Complaining violation of the orders of this Cou-t dated 19.10.2023 pa:;sed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W'P'No'28571; of 2023' the petitioner preferred the present Contempt Case' 3 Thi Cou rt, vi e its orde dat d 19.10.?9_23jD. A.N e 2 P 28 n b 23 sed n erl "Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitirtner. It is the sPecific case of the Petitioner is that, inspite of the petitioner's representations dated 2t;-Ol- 2022, 76-09-2022 and 2l-02-2023 addressed to the 2nd rer;pondent herein seeing release of amctunts legally clue to the petitioner for having availed petitioner's Transport services on a running ac(:ount for the period September, 2015 to November, 2OL6, yet there has been no action Initiated on behalf of 2nd I I I I I i I I i ! I I I '. :.1 2 SN, J cc 81 2025 respondent for considering the representations made by the petitioner dated 25.01.2022. 16.09.2022 and 2I.02.2023 till as on date. Taking into the consideration the above said submission, the 2nd respondent herein- is directed to consider the petitioner,s representations dated LS_OL_ 2022, 16-09-2022 and 2I-02-2023 seeking retease of the due amount to a tune of Rs.20,L2,2421_ for the Transport services rendered by the petiiloner within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order and duly communicate the decision to the petitioner herein. ' Post on 08.1L.2023."

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalF of the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the interim orders of this court dated 19.10.2023 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.p.No.2B575 of 2023, the respondent issued proceedings No.117/DM(proc)/ DGM(prod)/2024, dated 17.o}.2oz4 to the petitioner informing him that the representation of the petitioner seeking payment of transportation bills to a tune of Rs.20,12,242/_ had been considered and payment of Rs.6,13,118/_ would be released as the services of the petitioner was utilized by TSDDCFL i.e., after formation of TSDDCFL during period 01.06.2016 to November, 2016. I l I I / / (' 3 SN, J (tc 8l 2025 5. Learned ,:ounsel appearing on behalf oF the t)etitioner contends that the petitioner received an am()Jnt of Rs.6,02,088.92,/' on 19.09.2024 and the petitioner is entitled for more amountsi ilnd hence, the present contempt case is filed' 6 Th DO rtion 7 M rss edb v the resDo e d her eund er: r 24 ndentto the Dro ceedi qs 24 etitio ner herein is '"Further the services of M/s. R' K'Tra nsport tvas utilized try the TSDDCFL i.e. after formation of the TSDDCT'I., durlng the period from 01'06'2016 to Novemberr 2016. Hence, the TSDDCFL have to release F.s.6,13,118/- But the amounts pertaininl; to the TSI)DCFL are under freeze. However, pursuant to the interim orders of the Hon'ble High Court dated 19-03-;102-3, we may release the said amount ol' Rs 6,13,116/- to M/s. R.K. Transport from TGDDC:FL account. Presently the Combined accounts of APDDCFI- final Audit for the period 01'04'2018 to 31.05.i1()16 is under finalization, after completior of the fina audit and receipt of the TGDDCFL share from the Frozen account the same shall be reimbursed to TGDDCFL account. Therefore, .pursuant to the interim orders of the Hon'ble High Court dated 19-10-2023 in WP NO' I I A SN, J cc 8t 2025 28575/2023, your representations for payment of transportation bills to a tune of Rs. 20,12,242/_ has been considered, and payment of Rs. 6,13,118/- will be released as the services of Mis RK Transport was utilized by TSDDCFL ie after formation of TSDDCFL during period 01.06.2016 to November, 2016 However, the balance amount payment will be considered, on finalization of Audit issues of Federation. Accordingly, your representations dated 25.07.2022, 16.09.2022 & 2t.02.2023 are hereby disposed off."

7. A bare perusal of the contents of the proceedings dated 17.08,2024 issued to the petitioner in comptiance to the directions of this Court dated lg.lO.ZO23 passed in W.P.No.28575 of 2023, clearly indicates that an amount of Rs.6,13,118/- would be released to the petitioner and after completion of final audit and receipt of the TGDDCFL share from the frozen account, further amounts would be.released to the petitioner and the balance amount payment would be considered on finalization of audit issues of federation and hence, this Court opines that there is no contempt as alleged by the petitioner. 8. Takinq into consideration: a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, -t- . I I i t I 5 SN, J cc 81 2025 b) The submissions made by th" learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent and,' c) The contents of the proceedings dated 17'O8'2O24 issued to the petitioner by the Managing Director, Tetangana Dairy Development COOP Federation Limited (referred to and extracted above), The Contempt Case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner .to pursue the remedies as are available to the petitioner under law. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The mis,:ellaneous applications, if any pending, sl-rall stand closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. K SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR a\ I bEc TION OFFICER 1 2 One CC to Sri M Atish Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] il ;; io sri ar,rtrtll Reddy Bommineni' Advocate [oPUC] Two CD CoP es ADI(PSL q HIGH COURT DATED:2710212025 I ORDER GC.No.81 ot 2025 5\AiE Crl $t2 ?.. Y s { j( l-) l$tr ?. 5 \r$s .$ r: CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS