M/s. Blue Birds High School, Rayapura, Hanamkonda, Warangal v. Under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the same, petitioner is hereby directed to pay the demanded amount in 12 monthly installments starting from 10-01-2005, and if the petitioner fails to pay any of the installments, the respondents are at liberty to proceed further in the matter. With…
Judgment
Cause title
circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring 27-8-2004 made AP SRO/WL/ENF/19739/WGL/7A Order/2003-04 passed by the 1st respondent herein, assessing the liability of the petitioner for payment of provident fund contribution as illegal and arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.R.N.REDDY The Court, at the admission stage, made the following:
ORDER:
The impugned order passed by the first respondent under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short ‘the Act’) is challenged in the present writ petition.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents and both of them have consented to the disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission itself.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is ready to pay the demanded amount of Rs.2,21,853/- and Rs.49,593/- in 12 monthly installments, which would start from 10-01-2005. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents expressed no objection for payment of the amounts in installments.
Operative part
In view of the same, petitioner is hereby directed to pay the demanded amount in 12 monthly installments starting from 10-01-2005, and if the petitioner fails to pay any of the installments, the respondents are at liberty to proceed further in the matter. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. __________________ N. V. RAMANA, J December 29, 2004 MRR / SVV Copy to: 1 The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and Authority Under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952, Sub-Regional Officer, balasamudram Hanamkonda, Warangal District 2 The Recovery offficer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation Sub-Regional Officer, Balasamudram Hanamkonda, Waragnal District 3 Two C.D. Copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Constitution of India — art. 226; Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Dec 2004. The bench was N V RAMANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.