The High Court · 2025

1 BAJAGOINA SRIJA, Wo. Ranjith, Age 26 yrs, Occ Housewife, R/o. Thandra Village, IVlamada Mandal, Nirmal Disirict 1 ...Respondent No. l/De-facto Complainant 2 The state of relangana, Through its public prosecutor, Honble High court of ...Respondent No. 1/Coirplainant lelangana. Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\rlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records in crl.A.No.20 of zo22 on th; file of the Honbte Princioal District and sessions. Judge at Nirmal and quash the judgment dated passed by the Honbte Assistant Sessibns .luOg6 ai f.tirrir-'in !41^0?!20^22- S.C.No.342 ol 2021 against the petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: AAJAGOINA SRIJA, Wo. Ranjith, Age 26 yrs, Occ Housewife, R/o. Thandra Village, Mamada [\rlandal, Nirmal District. AND ..Petitioner/Respondent No. 1 BAJAGOINA @ _BAJAGON| RANJ|TH, S/o Raja Goud, Age 34 yrs, Occ Private Teacher, R/o. Lingapur Village, Kadam li/indal, Nirmai Districi. KOLLURI NAGARAJU, S/o. Lachanna, Aged about 26 yrs, Occ-. VRA, R/o. Lingapur Village, Kadam lt4andal, Nirmal D'istrict. 2 ... Respondent No. 1/petitoners

3. The state of relangana, Through its public prosecutor, Honbre High court of ...Respondent No. 3/RespondLnt No. 2 Telangana. Petition under section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to compromise the matter. t.A NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise accorded between the p;titioner and Respondents- N_o.1 and 2 and allow the quash petition by quashing the judgment dated 1410912022 passed by the Honbte Assistant sessions Judge at ltirmat in S.C.No.342 of 2021 . This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Naresh Reddy chinnolla, Advocate for the Petitioners and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri K. siridhar Raju, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. i The Court made the following: ORDER I I I i I I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos .2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.530 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.342 of 2021 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge at Nirmal, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506 r/w 34 ofIPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.l, that during pendency of thb present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 10.01.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 21.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.r and 2 in S.C.No.342 of 2021 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge at Nirmal, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, /,TRUE COPY// Sd/. N' SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,,T '$- il'r-/ sEcrloN OFFICER '1 . The Principal District & Sessions Judge at Nirmal' i. rn" nttitbnt Sessions Judge' Nirmal : inl iilil"atluaiciat First"Class Magistrate at Nirmal 4. The Station House Omcerl Ma'J' po'ii"" Station'..Nirmal District' 5 The Secretary, High c"'n L;;;i s"'ulles committee' High court Buildings' a ?I:%t:i; Public Prosecutor' Hish court for the state of relansana at , 31"" ff; s',iil,t"tr'' Reddy chinnolla Advocate toPUCl ; il ci i" sti K Siridhar Raju' Advocate [oPUC] 9. Two CD CoPies " Hvderabad. (OUT) DL/gh i.n"to."A a coPY of Joint Memo) r- ' r t r t *a !-' ( { $ S.T €I \ 2 a .i.' + -) o 2 7 rEB ?025 * DE SPATC HIGH COURT DATED:29/01t2025 COMMON ORDER cRtMINALPETITroN NO :5 300 F2 025 ,l-1.1.", 2 and 3 of 2o2s and urrmrnal petition are afiowed @ry''e *e-- -r*\{"( I IN TIIE IION'BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITTDERABAD CRL.P. oF.2o2,- BETWEEN: I. BAJAGOINA @ BAJAGONI RANJITH S/o. Raja Goud, Age: 34 yrs, Occ: Private Teacher, R/o. Lingapur Village, Kadam Mandal, Nirmal District.

2. KOLLURI NAGARAJU S/o. Lachanna, Aged about 26Yrs, Occ: VRA, R/o. Lingapur Village, Kadam Mandal, Nirmal District.

1. BAJAGOINA SRIJA, W/o. Ranjith, Age :26 yrs, Occ: Housewife, AND . . . PETITIONERS R/o. Thandra VillAge, Mamada irlaridal, Nirmal District.

2. THE STATE OF TELANGANA Through its Public Prosecutor, Hon'ble High Court of Telangana. .. .RESPONDENTS JOINT COMPRO MISE MEMO It is humbly submitted that the petitioners and tr're respondent No. 1 have compromised the matter out of the court with the intewention of elders and well wishers and in view of the compromise the petitioners pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to call for the records in crl.A-No.2O of 2022 on the hle of the Hon'ble Principal District & sessions Judge at Nirmal and quash the judgment dated 14-09-2o22 passed by the Hon'ble Assistant sessions Judge at Nirmal in s.c.No.342 of 2o2l against the petitioners/Accused No.1 & I l , , J 2, in lhe interest ofjustice and pass such further or other order or orders thai' may be deemed fit and proper in the circimstances of the case_ ! Hence this Joint Compromise Memo. Place: Hyderabad. Dated:Z -@q-2O25 n fl,\r,oej/ RESFONDENT No.1 PETITIONER NO.1 o K:'Na6azsalu PETITIONER-I{O.2 COUNSEL FOR ;r'lt DENT No.l COUNSEL TI