The High Court · 2025

High Court Legal Services Committee, H),derabar1, for settlement. After due deliberations, the Lok Adalat passed an award on

14.06.2025 as per the terms agreed upon by the parties. The original au.ard dated 14.06.2025 is filed before thir; Court and the same is taken on record. Accordingll', this appeal is disposed of in te.-rns of the arn zLrd dated 14.06.2025 by the Lok Adalat. Miscellaleous petitions pending, if ar-ry, shal1 sta;rd closed. SD/.A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISiTANT REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman, tvlACT-cum-ll Additional District & Sessirn Judge, Adilabad 2 One CC to SRI S SURENDER REDDY Advocate [OPIJC] 3. One CC to SRI M MADHAVI PRIYA Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies GR/PSI, d [trNCLOSED .{ COPY OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK z\l)ALA1'l '' . .A .: 'l{ : '' '1"" ,:!i]itr \.. *i -1r't:t$ - HIGH COURT DATED:171O712025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.33 of 2024 ,..\. .J '\ l,.i I ,,-r "7. 17 itlJ 2t]zt '') ,/ DISPOSED OFF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. lunder Section 19 of the LegaI Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Centrat Act)] Date:1 4-06-2025 RL5 t:.r :) o() $isx'f' t .t thE 1 le o\ Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Laxmi Narayana Atishetty (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Kavita Yadav, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.NO.33 of 2024 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST MVOP.No.'l 5Ol2O21 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunat cum ll Additionat District and Sessions Judge at Aditabad) Between: - Chippakurthi Gorru @ Gourubai, W/o. Rajaiah, Age: 58 years, Occ: Vegetabte Vendor, R/o. Native of Shivapur, SC Cotony Bareguda, Kagaznagar Mandat, K. B.Asifabad, But presentty resident at H.No.9-11711, Ramnagar, Aditabad. AND ...APPELLANT/PETITIONER '1 . Zeeshan Ul Hye @ Mohammad Jishan, S/o. lkram Hye, Age: Major, Occ: lmmam at Mohiyoddin Mosque & Owner-cum-Rider of Crime Vehicle bearing No.AP.01 .AD.9079, R/o.H.No.'l -54l40, NGO's Cotony, Borigaon Vittage, R/M.Kagaznagar, K.B.Asifabad District.

2. Bajaj General lnsurance Company Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Office: 'l't Ftoor, Behind Wakefietd lT-Park, Viman Nagar, Pune (Maharastra\-41 1014. counser ror Appettant /petitioner , s,.i s. il;5ff::[%tJ]lt1ff"t:?yt-tt Representative of Insurance Company : Sri K.Dhanvanth, Senior Legat Officer/ Sri T.Roshi Reddy, Advocate Sri P.Chaitanya Raman, Executive Trainee Counsel for Respondent/ lnsu rance Company : Ms.M.Madhavi priya, Advocate/ Sri A.Rama Krishna Reddy, Advocate This appeal having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the foltowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunal Rs.1,09,000/- (Rupees One lakh nine thousand on[y) with propcrtionate costs and interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of fiting of original petition ti[t the date of deposit. ( C-ompen sa tio n lwarded iSetttement Reached ) in the Lok Adatat. I l E6- a: o \r _'- . F-\ ^.,',.}GL l?i'-'' I lhe Statc Apportionment of Com en s ation AdditionaI Direction (s): if an v This appeal has been preferred by the Ctaimant a n e d order passed in OP No.150 o'f 2021 f>y thc Chairman, M Clajms Trrbunal cum ll Additionat Dit;tlct and Sessions Judge at Adilabad A o e t .\Dy\ Sri P.Chaitanya Raman, Executive Trtirree of lnsurance Con-rpany and the Counse[ for the Appettant/Petit oner have appeared before the Lok Adatat. The Appe [Lant- Peti tio rrer atong with his counsel has appeared and identified before the Secretary, Hlgh Court Legal Servrces Comrnittee, Hyderabad. Du ing the pendency of this Appeat, the Appeltan t- Petitione r and llespondent No.2-lnsurance Company have entered into a sL.ttlern3r.rt and in v'iew of the same, the Respondent No.2 lnsurance Company has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.90,000/- (Rupees Ninety thousand onty) in addition to the amount atready deposited towarCs fut[ and final settlement and the Appe [an l-Petitioner has ar;reed to receive the same towards futl and final setttement of lris claim. Accordingly, the compromise is recorded and the ca-.e is se[tted before the Lok Adalat ln view of the above settlement, the li.espondent No.2-lnsurance Company is directed to deposit the above settted amount within a period of (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of Arvard, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the even[ of default or detay in rnaking such deposit, the Appettan t / Petitioner is entitted to ct;rir interest@ 8% per annum from the date of defautt. i I l

1. The Appettants is entitled to the refund of Court Fee paicl in this appeal. 2. The amount already deposited by the lnsurance Comp,any, if any, shatl. be grven credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the Insurance Company, the i\ppeltant/ Petitioner / Ctaimant is permrlted to withdraw the entire amount. ln token of consent for the above setttement and awar<i, the parties and thejr counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the partles, this case stands disposed of. 1 I 5 '".: " ' 1r- 1 r-&-n+rZl"tT ; 'I , Appellant (s) Respondent (s) --.-,.q Llr 4,.D--^X-. ) A-r.; A---4 ior Bajaj Al G nsurance C..r. LId eral*w Autiti'r!ti.] ) .l r' -: , 131Iotr1!L / CounseI for the Appellant (s) Counsel for the Respondent (s) a MEMBER CHAIRMAN ,*ffiR VlCfg q O m I ttee) ro, lha g1s\e c,\