✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,067 words

Counsel for the Appellants: Sri A' Prabhakar Rao Counsel for the Respondent No'2: Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO I'ANDIKONDA M .A.C.M.A.No.1934 of 2Ol2 JUDGMENT: pursuant to the request made by the le rrned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was eferred to Lok Adalat. On 17.O7.2025, the matter was settk:cl b'efore the Lok Adalat and an award r,vas passed by the Lok Aclr lat. ln vieu ol the above, the M.A.C.M.A. is lisposed of in terms of thc au,ard, dated i7.07.2025, passtC by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs- As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions ;; rnding, i[ any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- It, OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSI.< TANT REGISTRAR '_f ;ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman Motor Accident CIaims Tribunal-cum-l\ Additional District Judge, (lll FTC) Warangal at Mahabubnagar.

2. One CC to Sri A. Prabhakar Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Advocate [OPU() 4. Two CD Copies (Enclosed copy of Award passed by Lok Adalat) M AS/karn \-- z r. I' .{E S t/i .4.-.c .,kk""' .i'.\t .'l a\ 'J , ftB 202n * Ot < rqTil lI- ',.--/ ':::-;5'- HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.1934 ot 2012 DISPOSED OFF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT .V BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Centrat Act)] stur, Date:1 7-07-2025 Present: 1 . Hon'ble Justice Dr.G.Yethirajulu, (Former Judge of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh High Court) Chairman

2. Sri N.Anirudh, Advocate, l-l IGtt c OUF.i KA9 ALC-I CJ() a, 4. i Stdle Member M.A.C.lvl.A. No. 1 934 ot 2012 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.763 ot 2010 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat cum Vl AdditionaL District Judge (FTC), Warangat at Mahabubabad) Between:- 1. Bhukya Veeranna, S/o. Goniya, Aged about 60 years, Occu: Labour 2. Bhukya Padma, W/o. Veeranna, Aged about 52 years, Occ:Labour 3. Bhukya Swaroopa, D/o. Veeranna, Aged about 15 years, Occu: Student (Petitioner No.3 is minor rep. by her next friend and Natura[ mother i.e., Petitioner No.2)

4. Bhukya Vennala Bai, D/o. Veeranna, Aged 22 years, Occu: Student. A[[ are R/o. Batu Thanda, Rajotu Mandat, Warangal District. AND 1. Gugutoth Laxman, S/o. Mangithya, Aged 35 years, Occ: Agricutture, R/o.Chamtta Thanda, Uyyatavada Vittage, DhornakaI Mandat, Waranga[ District. 2. lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Co, Ltd. Rep. By its DivisionaI Manager, Mumbai. 3. lClCl Lombard GeneraI lnsurance Co., Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Warangat. ... Appellants ... Respondents Counsel for the Appetlants/C laimants : Sri A. prabhakar Rao, Advocate, CounSe[ for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance Company : Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyata, Advocate. Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Leqal Ctaims This appeat having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the foltowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunal Sixty-seven thousand onty) atong with Rs.67,000/ - (Rupees proportionate costs and interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition tit[ the date of reatization Compensation Awarded (Setttement Reached ) in the Lok Adatat This is an appeaI fited by the Petitioners/: erimants aggrieved Award passed in MVOP No.763 of 20'10 :y the Chairman, Accidents Ctaims Tribunat'cum-Vl Addition I District Judge (ll by ttre I'I 11o tor I I.FTC), WarangaI at Mahabubabad. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior A{.r ager-LegaI Ctaims for the Respondent Nos.Z & 3-lnsurance Company z r Nos.1 to 4 have appeared before the Lo< r both the parties reported that they enter€( c the Appeltant/ Ctaimant c alat. After negotiation, into compromise and the matter has been settted. As per the settterr rnt, the Respondent Nos.2 & 3-lnsurance Company, has agreed for enlr (Rupees Two lakhs twenty five thousand or I interest in addition to the amount alr Appettants /Ctaimants have agreed to recei\'( final settlement of their ctaim. Accordin€[ and the case is settled before the Lok Adaia ln view of the above said setttement, tr agreed to deposit the above said amount wi from the date of receipt of copy of this ,\ amount that was deposited, if any. ln the : making such deposit, the Ctaimants/Appe.l interest as awarded by the Tribunat. ncement of Rs.2,25,000 i - ,' in lumpsum without any rady deposited and the the same towards futl and , compromise is recorded ,lnsurance Company has hin a period of (2) months vard, after deducting the ,r:nt of defautt or detay in rnts are entitted to ctaim The apportionment among the Appettant/P€ .itioner/Ctaimant Nos.1 to 4 shatt be made as per the apportionment c:termined by the Tribunal in M.V.O.P.No.763 of 2010. '1-.

7.s a- f C) l3tl3":-" .\ a..li)r-. Slil'J 5\ Apportionment of Compensation, if any Additional Direction s

1. The Appettants /C laimants are entitled to the refund of (.( Lrt Fee paid in this case.

2. The amount a[ready deposited by the lnsurance Company, i1' any, shall be given credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the Insurance Company, the Appett.r Nos.1 to 4 are permitted to withdraw their entire share anrr l/ Petitioner/Ctaimant Lnts as per the orders made by the Tribunat. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parr ls, this case stands disposed of. \a

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments