The High Court · 2025

25.8ompalli Narsimhulu (died) as per LR Smt.M.Neelamma Wo Bompally Narsimhulu, age: 32 years,

26.S Shekarappa, S/o S.Ammurappa, age72 years, 2T.Abdulla S/o Gallu Sab Mahgmed (died) as per LRs Ashibi Wo Abdullah, age: 60 years.

28. Rabia Wo Turka Khathat Ahmed, age: 35 years,

29. Erukali Yellappa S/o Yellappa, age: 77 years, 30. S.Chandrashekar S/o Amruppa, age: 65 years,

31.Vadla Venkatesh (Died) per LR.. Smt.A.Eshwaramma Wo Vadla Venkatesh, age: 42 yrs,

32. Gaddam Shekar S/o Hanumanthu, age: 48 years, 33.N.Manemma Wo Venkatesh, age: 42 years,

34.Chakali Chinna Kistanna S/o C.Balanna, age: 52 years,

35. Gaddam Thayappa S,/o Pedda Savaranna, age: 52 years, 36. G.Mangamma Wo Gaddam Thayappa, age: 42 years,

37.Gaddam Laxmanna S/o Suvappa, age: 57 years,

38.Gaddam Anjanna S/o Savarappa, age: 47 years, 39. B.Narsingamma Wo Hanumanthu, age: 57 years,

40.B.Gnaneshwar S/o Hanumanthu, age: 37 years 4l.Anjaneyulu (Died) per LR Smt.B.lndiramma Wo Anjaneyulu age: 28 years,

42.Karne Suvanna S/o Sayanna, age: 67 years,

43. Mallesh (Dbd) as per LR Smt.C.Bhagyamma W/o Mattesh, age 4t yea$, 44. Chinna Hanumanthu S/o Pedda Sayanna, age: 67 years, 45. Kamalamma Wo Chakali Flanumanthu, age: 47 years,

46.Mallesh S/o Chakali Pedda Kistappa (Dbd) as per LR Mahewari Wo Krishna age: 42 yrs,

47. Krishnaiah S/o Balappa, age: 50 years,

48.Turka Kathal Ahmed S/o AMulla (Died) as per LR Ashibi Wo Abdul*ah, age: 60 years,

49. Rabiya Wo Turka Kathal Ahmed, age: 35 years,

50.Gapur Sab S/o Gullu Sab age: 77 years,

51. Chakali Venkatanna S/o C.Ashanna, age: 42 years,,

52. Mandla Suresh (Died) as per LR Smt.M.Kamasamma Wo Mandla Suresh age: 32 years,

53.Anjanna S/o. Hanumanthu, age: 62 years,

54. M.Nagendramma Wo Venkatesh, age: 49 years, 55. Khajamma Wo Hussain Saheb, age: 62 years, 56. K.Veeramma Wo Baswaraju, age: 57 years,

57. K. Balraju S/o Balappa, age: 39 years, All are agriculturists and residents of Anugonda village, Makthal Mandal, District Narayanpet' Respondents/craim petitioners lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under S'ection 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affklavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pbased to stay the execution of the Order and Decree Dt: 2f,1912.023 passed in LAOP.No.3 of 2023 by the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpbt. Counsel for the Appellant : cP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N PRAVEEN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER I I \ \ THE HOT'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KTIMAR SHA,VILI AITD THE HON'BLE SRT .R,STICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALTSHBTTY L.A.A.S.No.21 of ?.O24 JTIDGMENT: eer the Hon'ble Sri Justi(p Abhinorld. Kunar Shauili) When the matter is taken up for heartrg, learned counsel for the respondents informed the Court that the Reference Court urZe order dated 26.O9.2O23 in LAOP.No.3 of 2023 enhanced the market value by two times (1+2) more than the value fixed by the Land ,Acqrrisition Officer; and that in identical appeal preferred by the claimants in respect of very siame acquisition, the Division Bench of thi.s Court in LAAS.No.S of 2016, urde judgment dated I5.O9.2O22, was pleased to enhance the market value by two times (L + 2l more tharr the value fixed by the l,and Acquisition Officer, which was also follorved by the Division Bench of this Court in LAAS.No.287 of 2015, dated 3O.OT:2O24. ThCreToie, oider passed by tlie Reference Court in L,AOP.No.3 of 2023, dated 26.09.2023, is in conformity with the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in L,AAS.No.S of 2O16, dated L5.O9.2O22. Therefore, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed.

2. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellant has not- disputed the sajd fact 1 a

3. In view of the same, tJre present Appeal is dismissed. The respondents are entitled for enhancement of market value by two times (1+2| as fixed by the Reference Court in LAOP.No.3 of 2023, dated

26.09.2(J23. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, ifany, shall stand s1:{.

9..19- //TRUE COPY" A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA JOINT REG|STRAR s CTION OFFICER To 1 2 3 4 ghPrl The Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet. Two CCs to GP FOR APPEALS, High Court for the State of T€langana. One CC to SRl. N.PRAVEEN REDDY, Advocate TOPUCI Two CD Copies [OUT] +y HIGH COURT DATED: OTlO1l2O25 JUDGMENT LAAS.No.21 of 2024 1t1!': ii i- 416 o'a ( ,) ?5 rE0 M / DISMISSING THE LAAS IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY LANO ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 21 OF 2024 Between: The L.A.O/P.J.P at present RLISP Unit-|, Makthal Narayanpet District. AND ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT

1. Mondipothula Kondanna, S/o Hanmanthu, age: 57 years, 2. Girini Alivelamma, Wo Anjanna, age.49 years, 3. Bolu Suwanna, S/o Hanmanthu (Died per LR) M.Anusujamma, Wo. Late Bolu Suwanna, age: 58 years,

4. Chakali Raju, S/o Narsappa, age.52 years, 5. Nazeer Ahmed, S/o Gullam Mohammed, age.62 years, 6. V.Srinivasa Chary, S/o Narsappa, age.59 years, 7. Sarojamnra (Died as per LR), Chippe Shivaraju S/o Manappa, age. 40 years,

8. Chippe Nagamma {Died per LR), S.Nagaraju S/o Basi Lingappa, age.56

9. A.Laxmi, Wo Jagadeesh, age: 42 years,

10.AAnjanna, S/o Savaranna, age:52 years, 1 1. Mandala Venkatesh (Dbd) per LR Smt lvffila Palhvi, Wo Venkatesh, age: 33 years,

12.G$iala Kondanna S/o Ammanna, age 12 years, l3.Chakali Manemrnma, Wo Kotanna, age 52 years,

14. Katike Babu, S/o Balaji, age 39 years,

15. Mangali Baswaraju, S,/o Anjeneyulu , age 42 years,

16. Gujiula Chinnaiah, S/o Bheemanna, age 47 years,

17. M Venkatamma, S/o Mangali Shekar, age 57 years,

18. K Ravi Kumar, S/o Anjaneyulu, age 38 years,

19.Mandla Laxmi, Wo Venkatanna, (Died) per. LR M.Laxmanna S/o Gundappa, age 38 years,

20.Jittem Laxmanna, (died) as per L.R G.Anjaneyulu S/o Ashanna, age 48 years, 2l.Gujjula Pedda Venkatanna, S/o C.Ammanna, age 48 years,

22.Naini Kistamma, Wo Bheemanna, age 57 years,

23.Vadla Venkappa, S/o Narsappa, age 72 years,

24.M Anjanna, S/o Hanmaiah, age 47 years,

25. Bompalli Narsimhulu (died) as per LR Smt.M.Neelamma W/o Bompally Narsimhulu, age: 32 years,

26.S Shekarappa, S/o S.Ammurappa, age 72 years, 2T.Abdullq S/o Gallu Sab Mahemed (died) as per LRs Ashibi W/o AMullah, age: 60 years.

28. Rabia \A//o Turka Khathal Ahmed, age: 35 years,

29.Erukali Yellappa S/o Yellappa, age.77 years, 30. S.Chandrashekar S/o Amruppa, age: 65 years, 31.Vadla Venkatesh (Died) per LR. Smt.A.Eshwaramma Wo Vadla Venkatesh, age: 42 yrs,

32.Gaddam Shekar S/o Hanumanthu, age:48 years. 33. N.Manemma Wo Venkatesh, age: 42 yearc,

34.Chakali Chinna Kistanna S/o C-Balanna, age: 52 years, 35.Gaddam Thayappa S/o Pedda Savaranna, age: 52 years,

36. G.Mangamma W/o Gaddam Thayappa, age:42 years, 37.Gaddam Laxmanna S/o Suvappa, age: 57 years, 38.Gaddam Anjanna S/o Savarappa, age: 47 years, 39. B.Narsingamma Wo Hanumanthu, age: 57 years. 40. B.Gnaneshwar S/o Hanumanthu, age: 37 years 4l.Anjaneyulu (Died) per LR Smt.B.lndiramma Wo Anjaneyulu age: 28 I years,

42.Karne Suvanna S/o Sayanna, age: 67 years, 43.Mallesh (Died) as per LR Smt.C.Bhagyamma Wo Mallesh, age:47 years, 44. Chinna Hanumanthu S/o Pedda Sayanna, age: 67 years, 45. Kamalamma Wo Chakali Hanumanthu, age: 47 years,

46. Malbsh S/o Chakali Pedda Kistappa (Dbd) as per LR Mahewari W/o Krishna age: 42 yrs, 4T.Krishnaiah S/o Balappa, age: 50 years,

48.Turka Kathal Ahmed S/o Abdulla (Died) as per LR Ashibi W/o Abdullah, age: 60 years,

49.Rabiya Wo Turka Kathal Ahmed, age: 35 years, 5O.Gapur Sab S/o Gullu Sab age: 77 years, 5l.Chakali Venkatanna S/o C.Ashanna, age: 42 yea6, 52. Mandla Suresh (Died) as per LR Smt.M.Kamasamma Wb Mandla Suresh age: 32 years,

53.Anjanna S/o. Hanumanthu, age: 62 years,

54. M.Nag,endramma Wo Venkatesh, age: 49 years, 55. Khajamma Wo Hussain Saheb, age: 62 years,

56. K.Veeramma Wo Baswaraju, age: 57 years,

57. K. Balraju S/o Balappa, age: 39 years, All are agriculturists and residents of Anugonda village, Makthal Mandal, District Narayanpet. Respondents/Claim Petitioners Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acqu,isiton Act, 1894 aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated.26.09.2023 passed in L.A.O.P. No. 3 of 2023, on the file Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of GP, for Appeals, Advoca(e for the Appellant and of Sri N.Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Respondents. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and the same is hereby is dismissed;

2. That the respondents be and hereby are entitled for enhancement of market value by two times (1+2) as fixed by the Reference Court in LAOP.NO.3 of 2023, dated: 26.O9.2O23;

3. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal //TRUE COPY// To

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet 2. Two CD Copies W A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA JOINT REGISTRAR. stbrrou orrrcen HIGH COURT DATED: 07l,0112025 DECREE LAAS.No.21 of 2024 DISMISSING THE LAAS a\