High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or w4s more particularly on in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents No. 1 to 4 in not taking action on the Representations .dt.17. 12. 2024, submitted by petitioner and the Representations 04. 11. 2024, 25. 11. 2024 submitted by petitioner brother in Prajavani as well as sent through Registered Post Acknowledgment due Sequesting to take necessary action against Respondents No. 5 and 6 who illegally occupied and interfering by digging the hillock and way and causing interference of free passage to petitioners Agricultural lands is illegal, atbitary consequenfly direct the Respondents NO '1 to 4 to take necessary action against the R,:spondents NO. 5 and 6 and Restore the way to go petitioner Agricultural fierdr; to an extent of ac.2 02 gts in SY. No 31 of Srhivanenigudem Village, Chityala Man,Jal, Now chityala Municipality. IANO:1OF2 025 'Petition ,nder rSection 151 cpc praying that in the circumst snces stated in the affidavit fire'i in srpport of the petition, the High court may be p eased to direct the Respondents N() 1 to 4 to take necessary action against th. Respondents No. 5 and 6 anrr Fresk>re the way to go petitioner Agricurturar fierds to an extent of Ac. 2. 02 gts in Sy No. 3l of Shivanenigudem Village, Chityala Mandal, Now chityala IVlunicipalty pr:nding disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI D. y. L. N. CHARYULU Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S and 6:-_- The Court made the following: ORDER l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C,V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.158 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is hled with the following relief:- "...1o issue ang order or direction wit or wits more pafticularly one i,t tlrc nature of WRIT OF MANDAMIIS declaring the action oJ the Respondents No.l to 4 in not toking action on the Representetions dt.17.12.2o24, submitted by petitioner end the Representqtions 04.11.2024, 25.11.2024 submitted bg petitioner's brother in Prajauani cts tuell as sent through Registered Post Acknoluledgment due requesting to take necessary action agarnst Respondents No.S and 6 who illegallg occapied and interking bg digging the hillock and wag and causing intetkrence of free passage to petttioner's Agicultural lands is iLtegal, arbitrary consequentlA direct the Respondents NO.l to 4 to tqke necessary actton against the Respondents NO.S and 6 and Restore the wag to go petitioner Agnculturol fteds b an extent of ac.2.02 gts in SY.No.31 of Sltruanenigudem Village, Chitgala Mandal, lvou chitgala MunicipalitA, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court mag deem fit and proper in the circumstonces of the case"

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent this writ petition 1S disposed of at the admission stage and in view of the relief sought in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the un- ofhcial respondents is dispensed with.

3. It is stated that the petitioner is the pattadar of an agricultural land to an extent of Ac.O2-O2 guntas in survey No.31, situated at Shivanenigudem Village, Chityala Mandal, Now Chityala Municipality. It is further stated that adjacent 2 CVBR, J \\'p 158_2025 to the petit <>ner's patta land, a village pathway exists in survey [tlo.31 to have ingress and egress to the adjacent pattadals I t is further stated thatjince long time, the said pathwal u,l-ri c:h exists in survey No.34 is being usr:d by the inhabitanl-s c,f the locality.

4. Th: gri,:vance of the petitioner is that respondr:nt Nos.S and 6, takin;3 advantage of the issuance of the pattadar passbool<s in their favour in respect of land in survr:y No.34, have norv enr::oached the pathway and they are nor aliowing the adja:ent pattadars to have ingress and egress to reach their lan,ls si uated in adjacent survey numbers.

5. This Cou.rt without expressing any opinion on the right and entillem€nt of the petitioner, as it is stated that a village pathway is e>risting as per the village revenue map ltrepared as per the p .,1.ri"iot-rs of the Telangana Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fas,li arr(l as the Tahsildar is competent to rerrove the encroachnlenlsi on the public pathways which are de1;icted in the village re./,lnue map, deems it appropriate to drrect the responderlt authorities to conduct arl enquiry and if it is found that there are any encroachments on thc public I i I r To, 3 CVBR, J wp 158 2025 road/pathway, they shall take appropriate action, 1n accordance with law.

6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-N. SRIHARI NT REGISTRAR AS T S CTION OFFICER I The Principal Secretary' Revenue Department' Secretariat Building' The State ' oiidri"sd"a, HYderabad' 2. The District Collector' Nalgonda District 3.TheRevenueDivisionalofficer,Nalgonda,NalgondaDistrict. 4. The Tahsildar' Chityal Mandal' Nalgonda District' 5. One CC to Sri D Y L. N' Charyulu' Advocate [OPUCI 6 Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana' at :i'

7. Two CD CoPies HYderabad [OUTI {t HIGH COURT DATED:0310112025 ORDER WP.No.1Sti of 11025 I '--:.-.. ,t Tlq.is^ -- *l\ \ 02 irPi] 2u5 { t '\.. T Z-' DISPOSING O[: THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (t, \t g 'l-5