Bandi Thirupathi v. 1. State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus uMer Article 226 0f the constitution of lndia declaring the action of Respondent Authorities for not providing employment to the Petitioner as sub-station operator at the 33/1 1 KV Sub-Station at Gopalapuram, Jashankar Bhupalpally District (erstwhile warangal District) in spite of execution of gift deed dated.24-11-2013 in favour of Respondent No.4 in respect of his agricultural land to an extent of Ac.o-20 Gts., in survey No.'145 minjamuly situated at Gopalapuram Village, chityal Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally (erstwhile warangal District), Telangana, as being discriminatory, illegal, null, void, arbitrary, contrary to law apart from being violative of Articles 14, 15,16,17, '19 and 2'1 of the Constitution of lndia. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities either to provide employment to the petitioner as Sub-Station Operator at the 33/1 1 KV Sub-Station at Gopalapuram Village, Chityal Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally (erstwhile Warangal District). Telangana or to pay compensation for his agricultural land to an extent of Ac.0-20 Gts., in Survey No.145 minjamuly situated at Gopalapurarn Village, Chityal Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally (erstwhile Warangal District), Telangana, which was gifted by his father in favour of 4th Respondent, forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT M.SARITHA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI N.CHANDRASHEKAR, SC FOR TGNPDCL The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER 1 I 1 THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTTIIK W.P.No.238o f 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition iS taken up for disposa-l at the stage of admission' 2 The writ petition is frled with the following prayer: 'To issue an apPropriate writ' order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India declaring the action of Respondent Authonties lor not providing employment to the Petitioner as Sub-station Operator at the 33/ 11 KV Sub- Sation at Gopalapuram, Jashankar Bhupalpally District, erstwhile Warangal District in spite of execution of gift deed dated 24 1 I 2O 13 in favour of Respondent No'4 in respect of his agriculturat land Lo arr extent of Ac.o-20 Gts in survey No.145 minj amuly situated at Gopalapuram Village' Manda-I, Jayashankar Bhupalapally erstwhile Warangal District' Chityal , as being discriminatory, illegal null' r'oid' arbitrary' contrary to from being violative of ArLicles 14' 15' 16' 17' 19 arlcl 21 ofthe Telangana Iaw, apart Consiitution of India" ' {earned counscl for thc

3. Heard Smt.Saritha Modukuru' learned Government Pleader for N.Chandrashekar, Iearned Standing Counsel tor TGNPDCL lor respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Perused the record EnergY for resPonden t No.1, Sri petttloner, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the request of Saraiah, had 4 respondent No.4, the father of petitioner namely Bandi 2 executed a Gift Deed dated 20.1 r.2or3, gifting their rand in favour of Government, without any consideration or compensation, for erection of 33/ 1 1 KV Sub-Station at Gopalapuram village, Warangal Rural Circle believing the version of respondent No.4 that the corporation wifl provide employment to the petitioner herein as Sub-Station operator in the newly erected 33/ 11 KV Sub-station at Gopalapuram v lage or in any sub- station in warangal district. Therefore, petitioner made a representation lo the respondent No.4 on 2S.l.2O2l with a request to provide employment in Gopalapuram Sub-station or in any sub_station basing on his educational qualihcations, but so far no action has been taken bv respondent No.4. Hence, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.4 to consider his representation and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated period ol time. the Respondent

5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for Corporation submits that there is no mention in the Gift Deed dated 2O.l l.2O l3 lor providing employment or compensation to the petitioner, however, the lcarned Standing Counsel submits that since thc represenration of rhe peritioner dated 25.1.2O21 is pending belore respondcnt No.4, the respondent No.4 will consider ald pass appropriate orders on the said representation. J

6. Having regard to the submissions made by the respective parties sand without going into merits of the matter' the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No'4 to consider the representation of the petitioner d.ated 25'i^'2O21 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible' preferably within a period o[ six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed, There shall be no order as to costs' /rrRuE copy// sdr- s'rvrSlll[ASJBlsFiS ,rSBfo"'"'* '"t*t.rn,,*i+,rt:',s,,$#*ftlflu.lp#*:I#:iil:T"'

3. The SuPerintendrng : lliffi ru*:r*r**t"tt* ff J::::;:H :' ;H'fr"itildfi i,h'+tgtl.t'xltt3?wi'n*'DcLAdvoca'ie (oPuc) iwo CD CoPies 8 SA PVL oB 1 H E s r.q r o .J ). o 11 AUE 2U5 (n a I * o €.sne TC HIGH COURT DATED: 1 I 1061202s ORDER WP.No.238 ot 2O25 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. \1r 7 (