High Court · 2025

Judgment

7. The State Of Telangana, Rep its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionatate, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, telanaga State. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, L.BNagar Zone at L.B.Nagar ranga reddy District The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vansthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Hayathnagar Ranga Reddy District Telangana Station P Ramesh Krishna, S/o Lakshminarayana, Aged about 49 years, fi/o H.No. 16-11-74513, Near Andal Nilayam,Moosaram Bhagh, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Ballemla Ramesh, S/o B.Shivaiah, Aged 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Ada Gudur, Addaguduru, Mandal Ranga Redy District, Telangana State. .. ,i"' ...RESPoNDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the action against the 6th 7th sth Respondent in not taking respondents in Crime No. 69712017 of Hayathnagar r i-r. ''1 , lii .. police Station, Rachakonda Cornrnissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana state, and not providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respondent as illegal and arbitry' against' violate of article 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of lndia, against the principals of natural justice consequently to direct the respondent No 2 to 5 to take appropriate action against ilre 6th 7th respondents herein as per law by intiteing investigation in crime No. 69712017 of Hayathnagai Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protectiorr to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th 7th responde,nts herein. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Pertition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afl'idavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent No.2 to 5 to take appropriate action against the 6th 7th respondents herein as per Iaw by initiating investigation in Crime No.697/2017 of Haya,:hnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commlssionarate, Ranga Reddy 'felangana by providing protection to the petitioner and his property from District, the hancls of the 7th 6th respondents herein, forthwith, pending disposal of this writ petition before this in the Honble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.VENKATESH GUNNA REP. FOR SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY counset for the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI D.PRADEEP. AGP FOR HOME Between: ch.papaiah, s/o. Late ch. venkataiah, 4ge!3.Ye.aE,.Occ. Business, R/o. *.No.'2-2-1Oo, Nagole, Uppal , Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. AND

1. Tre State Of Secretariat, ...PETITIONER its Prl. Secretary, Home Deportment,

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionarate, L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. property from the hands of the 6th & 7th respondents herein, fothwith, pending disposal of this writ petition before this Hon'ble court and pass Gounselfor the Petitioner: sRl M.VENKATESH GUNNA' REP. FOR SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY counselfor the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI D.PRADEEP. AGP FOR HOME Between: Ch.Paoaiah. S/o Late Ch. Venkataiah, Age. 64 Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.2-2- f OO, f.jagote Road Uppal, Ranga reddy District,Telangana State. ...PETITIONER AND

7. The State Of Telangana, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commisionerate, LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict, Telangana State. The Deoutv Commissioner of Police, LB Nagar Zone, at LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy Distiict, Telangana State. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram, at vansthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station; at Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. P Rama Krishna, S/o Lakshminarayana, Age,47 Yqars,-R/o HNo.16-11'74513, i.feii AnOit ttitayam, Moosaram Btiagh, Hyterabad, Telangana State E. Chiranieevi, S/o E.Yadaiah, Age3p ygqry, .Blo !:{.[or.5-64. Kondampet Villaqe. A2empeta Grama Panchalath, Veldevi Post, Addaguduru Mandal, Ranfia Reddy bistrict' Telangana ...RES'.NDENTS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in not taking action against the 6th and 7th respondents in Cr:ime No.696/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, and not providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the hands of the 6th and 7th respondents as illegal

3. Th,e Deputy commissioner of Police L.B Nagar Zone, at L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddy Distiict, Telangana State.

4. The Assistant Comrnissioner of !o1ice, Vansthalipuram, at Vansthalipuram' -' Ringa Reddy District, Telargana State'

5. The Station House Officer, Hayalhanagar Police Station, at Hayathanagar' Renga Reddy District, Telangana State'

6. P. Rama Krishna, s/O LakShminara.yana, Ag.e 49 years,-occ.. BuP.iness,.R/o -Moosdram Bhagh, Hyderabad, -N;ar -fiail - Niiayarir, H.r\o.16-1 1-741ii, Telangana State. 7UN:i'ff state' 5t/l"Hl*dfl""ity",TSfl gd"tnR#1"'ETii,,P3,";,,ff :?E:?nH: ..-RESP.NDENTS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lilandamus, by declaring the action of the Sth Respondent in not taking action against the 6th and 7th respondents in Crime No' 60112017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, and not providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respondent as illegal and arbitrary, against, violate of article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia, against the principa s of natural justice consequently to direct the respondent No.2 to 5 to take appropriate action against the 6th and 7th respondents herein as per law by initiatingr investigation in Crime No. 601/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakr>nda Commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respondents herein. lA NO: 'l OF 2018 Petition under Sectbn 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitkcn, the High Court may be pleased to direct ttre respondent No.2 to 5 to take approapriate action against the 6th & 7th respondents herein as per law by intiateing investigation in Crime No. 601/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protection to the petitioner and his and arbitrary, against, violate of article 14,19 and 21 of constitution of lndia' against the principals of natural justice consequently to direct the respondent No.2toStotakeappropriateactionagainstthe6thandTthrespondentsherein as per law by initiating investigation in Crime No' 696/2017 of Hayathnagar Police station, Rachakonda commissionarate, Ranga Reddy District , Telangana State, by providing proteAion to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 4th and 7th respondents herein. IA roF 18 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directtherespondentNo.2to5totakeappropriateactionagainstthe6thandTth respondentshereinasperlawbyinitiatinginvestigationinCrimeNo.696/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionrate' Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protection to the petitioner and his propertyfromthehandsofthe4thandTthrespondentsherein'forthwith' pending disposal of this writ petition before this Hon'ble court and pass Counsel for the Petitloner: SRl M.VENKATESH GUNNA' REP' FOR SRI DT. CHALLA SR]NIVASA REDOY Counsel for the Respondent No.'t to 5: SRI D'PRADE€P' AGP FOR HoME WRIT PETITION NO:588 oF 2018 Between: Ch.Paoaiah, S/o Late Ch. Venkataiah, ASu' .61-09"' Business' Fl/o H'No'2-2- io'o, ftLl"i"' R&o Uppii, Ranga reddv District,Telangana state' ...PETITIONER ANO 2 rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, 'l . The State of Telangana' Secretariat, HYderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate, L B'Nagar' Ranga Reddy District, Telangna State. The Deoutv @mmissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar Zone' at L'B'Nagar, Ranga Reddy D'rsfrict, Telangana Sta&e. 3

4.TheAssistantCommissionerofPolice,VansthalipuramatVansthalipuram' Ranga Reddy DlStrict, Telangana State.

5. Tho Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Polioe Station at Hayathnagar, Rarrga Reddy District, Telangana State. 6. P.Flama Krishna, S/o. Lakshminarayana. age- 49 years, - i{.itoi6-ii-7+slg, Nlear Andal Nilayam, -Occ .Business, R/o' -Moosdram Bhagh, Hvderabad' Telangana State. 'il:il3'li,x'irLTg'&.t'ft ;.I,'U"[Sf Ja#?.1"J"ffi aro8"o.*3.',"ff i]#"? State. ...RESPONDENTS Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed thererivith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the sth Respondent in not taking action against the 6th and 7th respondent in crime No.602/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Stltion, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District' Telangana State, and not providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respondent as illegal and arbitrary, against violate of Article '14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia, against the principles of natural justice cc,nsequently to direct the respondent No.2 to 5 to take appropriate action against the 6th and 7th respondents herein as per law by intiateing investigation in Crime No.602/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protectiofr to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respond€,nts herein. lA NO: 1 OF 20'18 Pe.tition under Section 151 CPC pralng that in the circumstances stated in the aflidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct th€! respondent No.2 to 5 to take appropriate action against the 6th and 7th respondents herein as per law by initiating investigation in Crime No.602/2017 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, by providing protection to the petitioner and his property from the hands of the 6th and 7th respondents herein, forthwith, pending ,Jisposal of this writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. -, a) I THEHONOURABLESRI.'T'STICTII.TTIKARAMII .:. ,l ,t. :i,?..,;.r...., - | - These writ Petitions are liled under ^A,rticle 226 of constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- ' '...to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly.one T P" nature of Writ o[ Manclamus, by declaring th9 action of th9 action of 5tn respondent in not ttittg action against the 6ttt-and Ztt Respondent' in not taking resp-on-dent:_q _Crime Nos' 697 /2Cs\2, AOt 1ZOL7, 6g6l2oi7 and 6o2lwl7 of Hayathnaggr Police station, Rachakonda commissionarate, larua x"dlv District, Tetangana St t", and'not providifg protection,to the petitione*od"ni" property-1rom ttre tuinaJgJ the 6ur and'7th article 14' respond"", "" iii"g"i 1g and i2t of c#stitution of tndia, against ttre,princiryls of natura]jus[iceconsequentlytodirectt}rerespo:rdentNos.2tot) -against tl:e 6tn a4d Ttt' 'resfonde4ts ts take oppr.,pA"te action p"i lat' by initiating investiel{l! in Crirne Nos' herein "" 697 l2CL7, 6CL l2ot7, 6s6/2}Liedrld 6o2l2OL7 of :.Hayathragar Police station, Rachakoncla Comrnissionarate, Rarrga Reddy petitiorrer ,rra fii" property from itre hand5 of"ttr'C,6tri and 7o' ".,a "Uitt"ty:.tg&"1'violateof

2.Hearc!Mr.M.VenkateshGunna,learnedcorrnsel representing Dr.Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

3. Since the petitioner and the issues raised in both these Writ Petitions are identical, they are hehrd toeether and are being disposecl of by this common order' COUNSEIfOTthE PEtitiONET: SRI M.VENKATESH GUNNA' REP' FOR SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent l,lo.f to 5: SRI D.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME The Corurt made the following: COMMON ORDER 4 L,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as tlte respondent police aqthorities failed to take appropriate action against ttre unoflicial respondent/accused in the related crimes, the present writ petitions have been fited seeking suitable directions from this Court. ,,'

5. Learned Assistant GovernmeSrt .P,leader for Home submits that the crimes, in question were duly investigated, i:. and finat reports were filed on 30.10,2018 before the Court ...:: of the XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hayathrlagar, :,,,].., ras "civil in nature." Hence, it is ciassifying the matters contended that nothing further sunriv.es for consideration in these writ petitions.

6. I have perused the material available on record. 7 Having regard to the relief sougfrt by the petitioner and the developments reported by t}e learned Assistant Government Pleader, it is evident that the contentions raised by the petitioner have been duly , addressed by the responcient police. Since final reports have aiready been fited before the competent Court, no further orders are rfirarranted in these rnatters J r) 8. Hc,wever, reserving the right of the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies available under law against the said final reports, if the cause still survives, these writ petitions \ afe disrnissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to t.'i Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if an5l, shall stand closed To, SD/- AHM AN //TRUE COPY// OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY' ' 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at loPUcl HyJerabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BSR HIGH COURT DATED i 2811012025 COMMON ORDER WP.No s.273, 372, 509 and 588 a ? I [[B 2026 * * DISMISSING ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS AS INIFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS bPtts t \d*