High Court · 2025

M/s Siddi Vinayaka lndustries, Rep by its Managing partner Smt. T.Radhika VV/o T.Sai kumar Aged about 54 years Occ- Business R/O H. No. 7-1-611711 , Ameerpet. Dharam Karan Road, Hyderabad

2. M.Chandrika, WiO M.Udaya shankar rao partner, of Siddivikanaka lndustries Dharamkaran road, Hyderabad Aged about 56 years Occ- business H No. 7-1-611711 , Ameerpet,

3. K.V.Adinarayana, S/o late K.V.Srihari Rao Aged agriculture partner of Siddivikanaka lndustries H No Dharamkaran road, Hyderabad about 63 years Occ- 7-1-611711 , Ameerpet,

4. M.Harsitha, D/o M.Udayashankar Rao Aged about 33 years Occ- pvt qmplooyee partner of Siddivikanaka lndustries H No. 7-1-61l7/1 , Amee4iet, Dharamkaran road, Hyderabad

5. Ch.T.MR.Nikhil, s/o t.Sai kumar Aged about 32 years Occ- pvt employee partner of Siddivikanaka lndustries H No. 7-1-61l7/'1 , Ameerpet, Dharamkaian road, Hyderabad petitioners ...PETITIONERS AND

2. J.

7. B. I The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District collector, Sangareddy District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga reddy Division and District The Tahasildar/ Joint Registrar, Sadasivpet mandal, Sanga reddy District The District Registrar, Medak District. The District Registrar, Sanga reddy district. The Sub Registrar, Sadasivpet, Sanga reddy District. M/s Sankreethi Real lnfra Private Limited, Rep by its Managing Director Preethi kumar Jha D/o Satish Jha Aged about 27 years Ocr Business Rl/o H.No. 2-1-445, PTS, lzzathnagar, Kondapur Hyderabad. M. Udaya shankar Rao, S/o Venkateshwar rao Aged about 60 years Occ- business Fi/o H.no. 3-19311, Sadashivapet, Sanga reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 2 to 6 in corisidering the representation dated 26.12.2024 and not to consider any document and not to entertain any document pertaining to the lands in survey No.3,4, 5 and 6 extent ac 32.19 gts situated at Yavapur village, Sadasivpet mandal, Sang reddy District relying basing on the alleged, created and forged simple sale deed dated 1.10.2020, general power of. attorney infavour of the respondent No. 8 and further the General power of attorney dated 12.9.2020 alleged to be executed by the petitioner No.1 infavour of respondent No 9 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to cons'ider the representation 26.12.2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 6 to consider the representation dated 26.12.2024 for the lands in survey No 3,4, 5 and 6 extent Ac 32.19 gts situated at yavapur village, Sadasivpet mandal, Sanga reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. ANITHA REDDY THIMMADI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR PETITION N o 2 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.2 to 6 in considering the representation dated 26.L2.2024 and not to consider any document and not to entertain any document pertaining to the lands in Sy.Nos.3,4,5 and 6 extent Ac.32.19 guntas situated at Yavapur Village, Sadasivpet Mandal, Sangareddy District relying basing on the alleged, created and forged simple sale deed dated

01.10.2020, general power of attorney in favour of the respondent No.B and further the General Power of Attorney dated t2.Og.2O2O alleged to be executed by the petitioner No.1 in favour of respondent No.9 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 26.t2.2024. 2, Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner though raised various grounds, however he has limited his grievance to the aspect of disposing his representation dated 26.72.2024, which is pending for consideration before respondent Nos.2 to 6 and also not to consider any document and not to entertain any document pertaining to the lands in I 2 Sy.Nos.3,4,5 and 6 to an extent Ac.32.19 guntas situated at Yavapur Village, Sadasivpet Mandal, Sangareddy District.

3. This Court vide its order dated tL.07.2023 passed in W.P.Nos.2437 of 2023 passed the following order: "Learned Assistant Government pleader for Assignment accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and seeks time to get instructions. Notice to respondent No.4, Personal notice is permitted. List on 21.02.2023 along with W.p.No.1Bs7O of 2OZ2 and 69LL of 2022. Vide order dated 09.02.2022 in W.p.No.6911 of 2022, this Court directed to maintain status quo obtaining as on that day shall be maintained. During the pendency of the aforesaid order, according to learned counsel for the petitioner. respondent No.4 is going to alienate the subject property in favour of third parties. In view of the same, matter requ ires examination. Therefore, till then, respondent No.3 is directed not to entertain any document to be submitted by respondent No.4 in respect of subject property i.e., land admeasuring Ac.6-22 guntas in Sy.No.5/2, Ac.8-13 guntas in Sy.No.7/2 and Ac.2-24 guntas in Sy.No.8/2, situated at Yawapur Village, Sadasivapet. Mandal, Sanga Reddy District".

4. Learned Government pleader appearing for Stamps and Registration placed a copy of the instructions given by the Sub- Registrar, Sadasivapet and in the instructions it is submitted that according to the representation of the petitioner, dated 26.IL.2024 and upon the interim order granted by the Hon,ble High Court in -) W.P.No.2437 of 2023 and 6911 ot 2022 submitted by the petitioner in respect oF the properties under Sy.Nos.3,4,5 and 7 of Yawapur Village of Sadasivapet Mandal has been notified under prohibited properties and a copy of the list of prohibited properties has been enclosed along with instructions.

5. Learned counsel for the petltioner verified the same and submits that no further orders are required since the properties are already entered in the prohibited properties.

6. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either side, this writ petition is closed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. i I To, //TRUE GOPY// SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY REGISTRAR ASSI CTION OFFTCER \ 1 . One CC to M/s. ANITHA REDDY THIMMADI' Advocate [OPUC] 2.lwoCCstoGPFoRSTAMPS&REGISTRAT|oN,HighCourtfortheState of Telangana at HYderabad [OUTI

3. Two CD CoPies BSR HIGH COURT DATED: 0710112025 CC TODAY 6E STAI c* o 1 o 'J 2[ lN lffi \,. .o t Oil.cr:, -C-i! ;a-' 7 ORDER WP.No.305 ot 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS /) b