I frre fr/iryatgr v. Occ. Bc,siness

10. CIl. Srini vas Si'o. Pandurangaiah, .\g.c : 45 \'ear.s. Occ: Business, t Sirop Nc,.J7), IVo. VIiryalgLrda, \llsorrcia District I I .(-lt.Kavitira D/o.N1oses. '\Si-' : .i I Ycars, Occ; [Jusiless. (Sirop No.5(r), IVo. Miyyalguda, Nalgonda District 12.D.SrinLr S /o.Rharral,a, Occ: Business(Shop No.57), R,'o. iVl i rl.alguda, Nalgonda District.

23.T.Denadai,al S/o.SLrdarshan, .\ge : 35 Years, Occ: Busirress, (Shop No.,i8). fu-o. Mir;-alguda, Nalgonda Disrrict. Con...3 i I I , { I : I I I I I I I :, ; I t ; i : I i I i i j I i I I I i I ! I I i I I f I I i II I t I t t, I i{ t -3- q

24. G.Sadanandarn S/o.G. Kishan, Age : 43 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.60), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda District

25. M.Eshwaraiah S/o. Veeraiah, Age : 60 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.62); R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda District

26.B.Somesrvar Rao S/o.Nageshrvara Rao, Age:41 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.7l), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda District 2 7. G. Satyan aray ana S/o. Venka i ah, Age: 43 Years, Occ: Bursiness, (Shop No.72), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda District

28. VId. Anr.var S/o. Rahntan, Age : 52 Years, Occ: Business. (Shop No.74), R/o. VIiryalgLrda. Nalgonda District

29.G.Ravinder S/o. Srihari, Occ: Business (Shop No.78), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda Districr.

30. D.Nagender S/o.Saidulu, Age : 34 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.80), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgonda District 3 I .M.Srinivas S/o.Guravaiah, Age : 42 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.8 I ), R/o. Miryalguda. Nalgonda District

32.Ch. Gopinath S/o.Subbaiah, Occ: Business,(Shop No.83 ), R/o. Miryalguda, Nalgorrda Disrrict i3. B.Srinivas S/o.Lakshmaiah, Age : 38 Years, Occ: Business, (Shop No.84), R/o. \4iryalgucla. Nalgonda District {nd Pctitiorrers l. The Cornrnissioner and Dilector of'Vlunicipal .{drrrinistrarion. .,\.P I{yderabad

2. The District Collector, Nalgonda Disrrict. at Nalgorrda 3. 'fhe Vliryalguda Municipalit,v- rcplesentecl by its Comrnissioner, Ivlirl,aleuda. Nalgonda District Resportdents Con...4 Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice of Eviction vide Lr.No.l\/t\//Leases/03/201 3 dated 30-04-2013 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the said Notices of Eviction vide Lr. No. [Vlt\illleases/03/2013, dated 30-04-2013 and further direct the respondents to execute registered lease Agreements to the petitioners in respect of the shops Nos. 3, 5, 7, B, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 39, 41, 42, 45, 47, 56. 57, 58, 60, 62, 71, 72, 74, 78, 80,81, 83 and 84, of .NTR Shopping complex", Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. t.A- NO: 3 0F 2013(W PMP. NO:177 17 0F 20131 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend operation of the proceedings i.e., Notices of Eviction vide Lr.No.Mlril/Leases/03/2013, dated 30-04-2013 issued by the respondent No.3 against the shops No. 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 27, 28, 39, 41, 42,45,47,56,57, 58, 60, 62, 71,72,74,78, eO, 83 and 84, of.NTR Shopping complex", N/iryalaguda, Nalgonda District, pending disposal of writ petition in the interest of justice . -Br, l.A. NO: 1 OF 2O1 . NO: 2104 OF 2013) Between I frre fr/iryatgr ' rvatoonja -ldral\rlunicipality, represented by rti cornrnissioner, yiryalqug6 Peti ticndr/' 'Respondcrrt^y' VS t;,'J Occ. Bc,siness Oc:: Business occ: Brisines., 13: I : "' " " i" i'ur,,.v i irlffi 'li :[h!t3:,?# i : ;i;;:;,;; b?" i l. x 3: ?.';3, I,l',"i: a,zt.il1,1,, n,,., I B Laxn'aiah ll/o.satyanraiair 2 R Vin_a1, S/o.{jenshaiah, .(Str;;;rJ;,i,. or" n,,,,, ,llguda. Nalgonda District ' Ii:: [iiiffi:,'{,: 3ii ]"1i1;,T'" M i rya Is u d a, N a rs o nda D i s rrict Ri. M irva Is uda, N a rs o n da D ist ri ct ' X;i: r!: fi :i.H,:J"t 3il $J;l,t' : $:i+g*ilgrufiupir*x *:"::ff:: vuu. rjr.rsrDe Ss (Shop wo. r Ot, hj,l..Ui* , i i!ff ,if ;ii cJ A.Ashol< S/o l-ate Narasrntha R;:o s rv cn,,,j."[.li.i:Tj,,ii |"");ll.i yj"r^" x:::,l1rs,11aa D sir;ci : "' , S t Ji ff rvargonJa-oiril,.',onn"rk' occ: eiui;nlss, rsn"i Nols","d,}llrrr,,.yr,g..,.u "i . " 1t Ch Madhan Mol ,, ym'#Wg,r*l'3;l'l;:l-*"r' occ: Business, (Shop No 20), Rio yrp,!r,orjJ:n:i#5: #:ddv, , " rJ t:.Hadmavathi Wo.Anantha Babu, Occ: I ,,Y'y:tguoa, ttaigonoa District '- ilil'ffff, ,:il;?:ff::::i,:[ilfJB/,1::i''n'.r occ: Business, (Shop No 28) i]/o ,;liiytfilT::r".,Hfl: A;l;[?r,,, occ Business, (Shop No 3e) Rio Ccc: Business, (Shop No 41), R,o ,; ,;;iii,i:5::i,'if1:1"#:llill^ ;;nx:i?11',f.d::::;i;" a"i"uss (shop No 42) R,o ,irvaisuda , ; i=^***lttff, :.i,;:,"::' ""'s' (s h op N o 45)' R/o' rvlirva,s uda Susiness, (Shop No.22), R/o. occ: Business (shop No 27), R/o im ::1I ot:c: Business, (shop No 21), R/o. ^iJ,,jfl:"r,#ai,o, ,u';:S:J"";i?[::yxr:lr:.i"i"['"',li'j;,,.,", ,, )H!!,!:.:i],:ii $:r:'lli tnx [x: 3 r,.? " "' " " " ,, ,.1,T T"T", I J; T:, ylx;,1::; ; lSrrop Nc 74) R/; ,l"r,,_L]j,"illill;,}" ;i, ;;;. : i,:'ff :; Distrct tqr+rz '67 23 G.F?av,nJer Sio Srrnari ()c-c. B.;siness (Shop No.78). - !/o iMrryalguCa, NalgonrJa Dislnc;t RiiXn"?';,,:l:;,t''J''u occ:ILrsiness' (shop No Ec) R/o lrirvarsrca occ i:i.;siness. (rlhop No.ri1). R/o rr/jryairrtrii;r t" Ilr:'J"T:;=r?l?,,?,r,""or;ih -i2 Ch Goprnath Sr,o S::boara:.., Ocr; L3usiness,(Shop No g3). f/" lv4r;-y3inuau. Na,gorCa D;si.,cl oci: il,,=,n"=.. (sncp Nc 84), R/o r\irryarguc:r '" ^?rt;;^';1rt,i,.,.;1tt't,,,,ai' (Petitioners in Wp .i4S6B Resoon Cen tsl.Petitioners of 2013 ' on the file of High Court) AND 1 The Comrnissioner and Director of Municipal Administration A.p., 2 Tl,e District Collector, Natgonda District, at Nalgonda Hyderabad Respond en ts/Reepon den t s. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in WPIMP.No. 17717 of 2013 in W.P. No. 14568 of 2013. dt. 09-05-2013 with costs. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WVMP. NO: 2620 OF 20!3) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the interim order passed in W.P.M.P.No.17717 of 2013 in W.P.No.1456g of 2013 dt.09.05.2013. counsel for the Petitioners: sRl K.SANTHOSH RAVI KUMAR, REp. FoR SRI SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FoR McpL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRt P.KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA, SC FOR MCPL The Court made the following: ORDER 23 G Ra,yinder S/o. Srihari. ()cc: [].;siness (Shop No.7B). ^^ Iio t',4iryalguda, Nalgor:Ca D,strr..;t iilLT#il.?l,t;it''d"'u' occ Eirsrness (Shop No 8c). R/o rv'iirvarg;r:ia occ i-ir::;i.css, (rihop rrro si). Ric M,rya1r;1;,1,,,. [.iJXlll:trul?;,.o,r,uru,ah t" ZX 32 Ch Gopinath S/o Subbaiah, Ocr;: i3usiness,(Shop No g3). - - !/g tt,4rryaigu<ja, Nalgonda Distr:ct '" R.],j|;'aTos'/o Lakshnraiair. occ iJt:siness. (Shop No.B4), R/o r,liryatgurla. Re soon den t sl.Petitioners (Petitioners in Wp i4568 of 2013 ' on the file of High Court) AND The Commissioner and Director oi Municipal Administration A.p., Hyderabad 2 Tt'e District Collector, Nalgonda District, at Nalgonda Respon den ts/Respon den ts. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in WPIVP.lrlo. 17717 of 2013 in W.P. No. 14568 of 2013. dt. 09-05-2013 with costs. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WVMP. NO: 2620 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the interim order passed in W.P.IM.P.No.17717 of 2013 in W.P.No.14568 of 2013 dt.09.05.2013. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt K.SANTHOSH RAVI KUMAR, REP. FoR SRI SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FoR MGPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI P.KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA, SC FOR MCPL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION o.14568 of 2013 ORDER: Today, when the matter carne up before this Court for hearing, Sri K.Santhosh Ravi Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Sreenivasa Rao Ravulapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and requested that the writ petition be dismissed as infructuous.

2. In vievt' of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-A.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -?(? SECTION OFFICER To,

1. one cc to sRl SREEN|VASA RAo RAVULAPAT|, Advocate [opUC] 2. one cc to sRl P.KR|SHNA REDDY purrA, sc FoR MCPL topucl 3. Two ccs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI

4. Two ccs to GP-FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of relangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies BSR PMK (A. HIGH COURT DATED:29l 8t2025 l E WP.No.145G of 2013 a -( r{E Sl/} ,. ^\ ,J .t 22tErM ?ll ,., 1l I I :",'='' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS (c 6 \'t- ,),