✦ High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,204 words

Petition undbr Article 226 o1 the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.650, in survey Nos.'1 1/14, 11115, 11116, 11117 and ,./ ' rrra, part of survey No.'1 1, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Rajendranergar Taluk, Road No.35, Ayyappa Society, Madapur, Ranga Reddy District, -'.s., bounded by North. prot No.651. South. prot No.649. East. Plot No.653. V/es1. 30' Wide Road., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequen y direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual servicr-' c.nnection without being infruenced by the instructions of the 8th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition urrder Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Resprtnd ents 2 to 7 to receive the application and release the individual servicr: clnnection to the petitioner, the. Plot No.650, in Survey Nos.'1 1/1 4, 11115, 11116, 11t17 and .1 1/.18, part of Survey No.1.l , admeasuring 300 sq yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Rajendranagar Taruk, Road No.35, Ayyappa Society, Il4adapur, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. plot No.651. South. plot r.Jo.649. East. plot No.6S3. West. 30 Wide Road., Counsel for the petitioner: M/s. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: AGp FOR ENERGy Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 7: SRI N.SRIDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL counsel for the Respondent No.B: sRr M.A.K.MUKHEED, sc FoR GHMc The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.11O of 2O25 ORDER: Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.8.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petltioner the Plot No. 650, in Survey Nos. 11/14, lVls, Ltl76, ll/L7 and 11/18 part of Survey No.11, admeasuring 300 sq yards, situated at Khanarnet (V) Rajendranagar Taluk, Road No.35, Ayyappa Society, Madapur, Ranga Reddy District, T.S bounded by North: Plot No. 651; South: Plot No. 649; East: Plot No. 653; West: 30'Wide Road., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual 2 "r: SN, J servic(-r clnnection without being influenced by the instructio,rs of the Bth respondent and to pass. . . "

3. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on' behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on brehalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 that the subject issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 21.08.2024 passed in W.P. No. 20263 of ?-024, hence, the present writ petition could be disposed of in:erms of the aforesaid order.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 7 on record and for the reasons alike in the above referred order passed by this Court in W.P. No. 20263 ot 2024 dated 2L.O8.2O24, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to receive the application of the petitioner seeking electricity service connection to petitioner's subject premises and further to consider the request of the petitioner for release of electricity 3 SN, J servace connection to the petitioner in accordance to !aw, in respect of petitioner,s subject property bearing Plot No. 65O, in Survey Nos. 11114, LL/LS, 1-L/1-6, Ll/L7 and 11l18 part of Survey No.11, admeasuring 3OO sq yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Rajendranagar Taluk, Road No,35, Ayyappa Society, Madapur, Ranga Reddy District Telangana State, within a period of four (O4) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same shall be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated L2.O9.2O12 passed in Writ petition No.2O4O7 of 2OO8 and batch. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand ed. However there shall be no order as o ts. SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTAN REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE TION OFFICER 1 . The Principal Secretary power and Hyderabad, State of Telang ana-500022. Energy Department Secretariat, To, 7 I 2 The Chairnran-cum-Managing Director' Telangana .State oiiir.io"ri.n Cor.npinv Limii6d:Vidvuth Soudha, Somajiguda Southern Power , Hyderabad.

3. The Chief Seneral Manager commercial, Mint Compound T G S P DC L' Hyderabad 4TheSuoeri.rterrdinoEngineer,TelanganaStatesouthernPowerDistribution ' C"rJaiv Lin it.o, ViOyrif' Soudha, Somajiguda' Hyderabad' 5. The Divisio.ral Engineer, Operation KondapurT G S P DC L 6. The Asst. f)ivisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur TGSPDCL 7. The Assist:rnt Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur TGSPDCL 8. The Comnliss oner, Greater Hyderabad tr'4unicipal Corporation' Circle 20' Tank Bund Roi:d, HYderabad.

9. One CC to lr,4/s. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate IOPUC] 10.One CC to SR N.SRIDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] 11. One CC to SR I/I.A.K.MUKHEED' SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] l2.rwoCCsioGPFoRENERGY,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OIJT] '13. Two CD CoPies BSR GJPFt. HIGH COURT DATED: 0310112025 ORDER WP.No.110 of 2025 CC TODAY E \ ,2a= 'r'rE S t'\ ft + o 7e. o 09 '[t\ 20? (:) -\ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS trc'

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments