✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Cuddpah District v. Pulivendula, Cuddapah District

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ petition is dismissed for default

Provisions considered

Judgment

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, holding that the action of the respondents in trying to lay the Road across land in Sy.No.352 of Komannuthala Village, Lingala Mandal, Cuddapah District without following the due process of law as illegal, arbirtrary and opposed to Art. 300-A and the Second provison to Art. 31-A of the Constitution of India, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : Oral order: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called. This writ petition is of the year 2002. The writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. 17th April, 2009. GRR ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed for default

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments