✦ High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jan 2025
Length
1,120 words

Acts & Sections

petition Under Articte 226 or theConstitution of tndia #:T]ffT: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direct. the nature or writ or Mandamus decrarins the action ;ln]ffJ:l.j:l]il1 :J ;; not receiving the apprication form and rerease the individuar service connection to the petitioner, thr-, l-{. No.2 -56133lzot1glA (Eastern part), In Gramakantam, admeasuring 150 sq. yards, (Out of total 300 Sq. yards) situated at Chanda Nayak Thanda, lzzalhnagar, Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy Districl, T.S., bounded by North. 25 Ft. Wide Road South. Neighbours House East. Neighbours House west. part of House bearing No.2- 56133120119lA, as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to rerceive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the gth respondent. !.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Unde'r Section '1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Responde,nts 2 to 7 lo receive the application and release the individual service connection to tl.re petitioner, the H.No.2-56 l33tzollgtA (Eastern part), ln Gramakantam, admeasuring 150 sq. yards, (out of total 300 sq. yards) situated at Chanda Nayak Ttranda , lzzathnagat, Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. 25, Ft. Wide Road: South. Neighbours House; East. Neighbours House; west. part of House bearing No.2- 56133t20t19tA. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 7 : SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : SRI M.A.K.MUKHEED The Court made the following ORDER , HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI TPE TIT o No.45 of 2025 I ORDER: Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counset appearing on behalf of the petitioner, tearned Assastant Government Pleader for Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, tearned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.8.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seekang prayer as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to th€ petitioner, the H.No.2-56l33 /2O/19/A (Eastern part), Gramakantam, admeasuring 150 sq. yards, (Out of total 300 Sq. yards), situated at Chanda Nayak Thanda, Izzathnagar, Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (wl, Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North: 25'Ft. Wide Road; South: Neighbours House: East: Neighbours House; West Part of House, bearing No. 256/33/20/Lg/A, as illegal, null void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release tfrc ---.-* a.r{*.:4}q.,:&. r: 3:- I 2 SN. J , individual service connection without being influenced UV tft" instructions of the Bth respondent and to pass..."

3.Itisrepresentedbythelearnedcounselappearingon behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos'2 to 7 that the subject issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this, Court dated 21'08'2024 passed in W'P' No' 20263 of 2024, hence, the present writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order' Ta king into consideration the facts and 4. circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both the tearned counsel appearlng on behalf of the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearlng on behalf of the respondent Nos'2 to 7 on record and for the reasons alike in the above.referred order passed by this Court in W'P'No'2O263 of 2024 dated 2L.O8.2O24. the Writ Petition is disposed of directing therespondentNos.2toTtoreceivetheapplicationof the peUtioner seeking electricity service connection to petitioner's subiect premises and further to considirr the request of the petitioner for release of electricity .":+eiea {3:f{Sli:t I (Eastern part), srvice connection to the petitioner in accordance to iaw, in respect of petitioner,s subject property bearang H.No.2-s6l3 g lzo / tg / A Gramakantam, admeasuring 1SO sq. yards, (Out of totat 300 Sq. yards), situated at Chanda Nayak Thanda, Izzathnagar, Khanamet (V), Serilingampalty (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, within a period of four (o4) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same shatt be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated 12.09.2012 passed in Writ petition No.2O4O7 of 2OOg and batch. However. there shalt be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be o order a to sts. //TRUE COPY// SD/. L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT EGISTRAR SE o OFFICER To Hyderabad. Telangana at Hyderabad-500022.

1. The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department Secretariat, State of 2. The Chairman -cum - Managing Director, Telangana State Southern power - Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 3. The Chief General Manager commercial Mint Compodnd TGSPDC L, 4. The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution 5. The Divisional Engineer,, Operation Kondapur TGSPDCL. 6. The Asst. Divisional Engineer,, Operation Kondapur TGSPDCL. 7. The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur TGSpDCL. 8. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad tVlunicipal Corporation, Circle 20, 9. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. [OUT]

10.One CC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [OPUC] 1 1 . One CC to SRI M.A.K.IvIUKHEED, Advocate (OPUCI 12.One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 13.Two CD Copies GJPei SA t C.C. TODAY r{E:iTA}(' 1 /l- c 0 $ J,li ?lE l'-,.*.._-,.,,...,1 i t ' .-z c) ).r HIGH COURT DATED:0310112025 ORDER WP.No.4S of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments