The High Court · 2025

Telangana. High Court Buildings at Hyderabad.

2. KanneboyaniBapaiah, S/o Vannauraiah, Aged about 37 Years,Occ. Employee, R/o 3B-31,Post No.2 1, Ambedkar Nagar, A.S.Rao Nagar, MedchelMalkajg iri District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 359(2) praying that in. the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleaged to record. the compromise entered by both the petitioner and 2nd respondent allow the Criminal Revision by setting aside the judgment made in CRLA.No 45Bl2OlZ dated O310412024 on the file of Honourable Xll Additional District Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B Nagar. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PERLA NARESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI B. SUDHEER KUMAR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER E l I I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI I.A.No.2 ot 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.9 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in CRL.A.No.485 of2o17, dated

03.04.2024 on the file of the learned Xll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar confirming the Judgment passed by the Vlll Special Magistrate at Hastinapur, Ranga Reddy District, in C.C.No.157 of 2016, dated 21 .03 2017, registered for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable lnstrument Act, 1881

02. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.No.2 of 2025 has been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offence.

03. Vide order dated 07.0'1 .2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for i t \ i I \., - 2 the state of rerangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

04. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 08.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

05. ln view of the above, I A.No.2 ot 2025 is allowed. Consequenily, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the Judgment dated 03.04.2024 passed in GRL.A.No.485 of2017 on the file of the learned Xlt Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B Nagar confirming the Judgment of conviction and Sentence dated 21 .03.2011 passed by the Vlll Special Magistrate at Hastinapur, Ranga Reddy District, in C.C.No..l57 of 2016, is hereby quashed Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. -- //TRUE COPY' sd/- DE I. NAGA LA(SHMI PUTY REGISTRAR ^l'\ r\ SECTION OFFICER I To,

1. The Xll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B Nagar. (with records, if any)

2. The Vlll Special tvlagistrate at Hastinapuram, Ranga Reddy District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at HyderabadlOUTJ

4. The Vl Additional JFCM, LB Nagar. 5. One CC to Sri Perla Naresh Babu, Advocate tOpUCI 6. One CC to Sri B. Sudheer Kumar, Advocate [OpUC] z. Two CD Copies (Along with the copy of memo of compromise) M- Plp/gh l HIGH COURT DATED:18101'.12025 COMMON ORDER l.A.No.2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLRC.No.9 of 2025 \ 3 0 Arit i06 :t c0 sP, lrCH ALLOWING THE !.A. AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE. cynff' -_-----.7/ IN HIGH COURT FoR THE STATE oF TELANGANA AT :HYDERABAD I.A.NO. Crl.Rc.No. In of 2024 oF 2024 Between KanneboyaniBapaiah S/o Vannauraiah ub-*1 3Tyears,Occ: Employee, 1F"1 R/o 38-31,Post .No.2l,Ambedk* Nugu., A.S.Rao Nagar, MedchelMalkajgiri dist.ict. And ..Petitioner

1.T|...St1r* ofTelangana, Rep. by its public prosecutor, High for the State of Telangunu. Uigh Cor,t nrifd"g, ut Hyderabad.

2. J Pandu S/o Rekhya aged about 36 years, 0. cc:,Employee, R ro H. No.7- I 39.A mbedkar Nagar J r llelagud4Gayanri Nagar.R.R Districr. ..Respondent/ Accused.&.espondent JOINT MEMO The petitioner/ accused has paid an amount ofRs.2,00,000i- (Rupees Twolakhs only) to the 2"d respondent towards full and final settlement for compromise in respect .on the file of the HonourableVlll Special Magistrate at CC.No.157 of 2016 Hastinapuram, Rangarddy 2' The 2odrespondent received an amount of Rs.2 Lakhs (Rupees Two Lakhs only) from the petitioner towards ful and final settrement in connection with the above criminal Revision and agreed to compromise the case leve ed against the petitioners/accused U/s Contd.2 ! 2 ofM Act. The 2'd rcspondent/complainant also agreed not to raise any disputes in respect of the cheques in comection with CC.No. 157 of 2016 on the- filc ol the Honourable VIII Special Magistrate at Ilastinapuram, Rangarddy. t No.2 @efacto-Complainant) w---'" 6ar.,o'{ F-ov lL- P-+i+ta*cN --M l'stitioner p< R"s?6v4''f-