✦ Gujarat High Court · 09 Aug 2021

RAMUBHAI KOYABHAI NAIK v. MR. M.K. JADAV, THE SECRETARY GUJARAT

Mca No. 1177 of 2019A DESAI, A P THAKER2 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. With above direction, all these applications are disposed of. In case of difficulty, it would be open for the applicants to revive all these applications. R.S. MALEK (A.J.DESAI, J) (DR. A. P. THAKER, J)

Judgment

================================================================ RAMUBHAI KOYABHAI NAIK Versus MR. M.K. JADAV, THE SECRETARY GUJARAT - ================================================================ Appearance: MS SHALIN MEHTA, Senior Advocate with MS ADITI S RAOL(8128) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS JYOTI BHATT, AGP (1) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. P. THAKER C/MCA/1177/2019 ORDER DATED: 09/08/2021 Date : 09/08/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI)

1.

Ms.Jyoti Bhatt, learned AGP appearing for the respondent has forwarded a communication dated 9.8.2021 issued by the Special Secretary, Narmada Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar Department, from which it is clear that they have forwarded the files to Finance Department for acceptance of the order, subject to out of the Special Leave Petition. Copy of the communication is taken on record. In view of above fact, she requests for time.

2.

On the other hand, Mr.Mehta, learned Senior Advocate opposes the request made by learned AGP.

3.

Having heard learned advocates for the parties and considering the fact that the order of which contempt is alleged has been passed way back on 24.1.2018 by learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.6060 of 2011 and allied matters and the same is confirmed by Division Bench by oral judgment dated 5.7.2019 in Letters Patent Appeal No.1291 of 2018 and allied appeals. Therefore, we pass following order. (i) The authority shall comply with the orders of this Court within a period of four weeks herein after, which would be subject to outcome of Special Leave Petition. (ii) The Finance Department is also hereby directed to see that the files forwarded by the present respondent is immediately processed, since the applicants-original petitioners are without fruits of the orders for more than three and a half years. C/MCA/1177/2019 ORDER DATED: 09/08/2021

4.

With above direction, all these applications are disposed of. In case of difficulty, it would be open for the applicants to revive all these applications. R.S. MALEK (A.J.DESAI, J)

(DR. A. P. THAKER, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Mca No. 1177 of 2019). ← Search more judgments