LAKHUBHAI PUNJABHAI MENAT(DECEASED) ORS v. MULABHAI KHUSHALBHAI LUTIYA
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Having heard Mr. Brahmbhatt, learned advocate and upon perusal of the application, the present application deserves to be allowed, which is hereby allowed in terms of Para 9(B). C/MCA/1986/2026 ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026
- Para 33. Accordingly, Civil Revision Application No. 26033 of 2025 along with connected Civil Application is ordered to be restored back on its original "le. SHAHANAZ (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Judgment
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT Date : 06/08/2026 ORAL ORDER
#1. At the outset, Mr. Hari Brahmbhatt, learned advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Dhaval M. Barot, learned advocate for the applicants, would submit that due to inadvertence on the part of the applicants, while seeking restoration of the revision application, they could not request this Court to restore the delay application so "led in the revision application.
#2. Having heard Mr. Brahmbhatt, learned advocate and upon perusal of the application, the present application deserves to be allowed, which is hereby allowed in terms of Para 9(B). C/MCA/1986/2026 ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026
#3. Accordingly, Civil Revision Application No. 26033 of 2025 along with connected Civil Application is ordered to be restored back on its original "le. SHAHANAZ (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.